#11
|
||||
|
||||
I am not adding salt to the injuries of candidates but one must accept the reality. FPSC regretted the earlier error which was the result of system related glitch and uploaded revised result alongwith total score, its is now crystal clear and now there should be no doubt in merit order.
Your DMS will also clear the situation and you can compare it with revised result. FPSC could have concealed these errors, whether they are intentional or unintentional, but they accepted their blunder publicly and corrected it. I don't think that FPSC has lost its credibility after this incident rather they have taken steps to further enhance its good performance. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Saturday, June 19, 2010) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
What step should be taken so that we are satisfied. How do we challenge the result?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
You are an eagle, flight is your vocation: You have other skies stretching out before you. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Waqar Abro For This Useful Post: | ||
#14
|
||||
|
||||
can this result be challenged?if yes on what grounds?
where it will be challenged in supreme court? what will happen if result challenged? its getting interesting
__________________
Reality is something you rise above. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
According to my knowledge, one has to challenge it to FPSC. They will form the panel who will hear ur petition and finally give a decision. After that if u r not satisfied, u have to appeal in FPSC again. And if the decision of review petition does not suit u then u can go to High court... this process is too long...
__________________
38th Common Inland Revenue Service |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
phir se rumours ahuru :-)
dear friends plz b patient.
at least wait until the dmcs are issued. my prayers r with all the deserving candidates... May God bless us all...
__________________
A diplomat is a man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never remembers her age... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Disgruntled with FPSC over CE-2009 final Result
I am also one of the affectees of FPSC's negligence or its meticulously gross manipulation with the final result. When the result was announced on 15th of instant, I felt shocked to know my postion i.e 444th.Despite revision it remains as mutatis mutandis! My close friends are shocked too over my position as it seems quite incredible to all. I do not own my written and viva marks which are not more than 833 after grand total. I am dead sure of my written marks which cannot be less than 735. I have come across many of the candidates, during multiple ocassions, had discussions with them who cannot utter a single sentence fluently in english, to my chagrin, they now stand among top 100. I have coached many of them in viva. It is the mockery of justice being dispensed unto us. I do not question their fate, but their competency.
The present panel has greatly proved to be inefficient and incompetent. Look, A promotee judge of the supreme has been appointed who does not know even the abc of CSS. We have observed him asking the pre written questions on his note pad. is it the status of the Chairman? who has conducted his interview before his selection as chairman, who conducted the interviews of the highly competent persona of the country? Look at Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) India, www.upsc.gov.in whose chairman is none other than a PhD holder from IIT Delhi, a former Dean from Institute of Indian Information Technology and Management. (See for further information at the profiles of the Chairman and other members of UPSC http://www.upsc.gov.in/general/rti/Annualr55/1.doc ). 1-I, stronly demur the composition of Viva panel consisting of chairman and other members who also observed the same pattern of asking the pre-written question with limited knowledge of the subject. 2-I, challenge the incoherent policy of FPSC in awarding marks of the subjects. 3-I challenge the Age Limit, whereby in our neighbouring country India, the UPSC grants 30 years age limit for the non-governmental officails and 32 for the Governmental Officials. Every one can avail four chances, until he crosses age limit restriction. There is no limit of chances for the scheduled castes only age limt restriction. There are many other points on which stern action is needed by the HOnerable Chief Justice of Pakistan. I am more than willing to cooperate with my Aggrieved Commuity of Centrally Sidesteped Souls (CSS) Let,s join hands for the sake of Justice, to ourselves and our posterity. Looking forward to receive an affirmative response from the Forum members, Ahsan Yousaf Chaudhary. *******@live.com Last edited by Andrew Dufresne; Saturday, June 19, 2010 at 01:19 PM. Reason: Kindly share contact info through your profile only |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deovolente For This Useful Post: | ||
ahmadbilal (Saturday, June 19, 2010), Ali Randhava (Thursday, July 29, 2010) |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
A computer lacks intelligence of its own .. it simply does what it is told to do
if any type of computer error occurs then it would uniformly apply to the whole data that has been processed
it cant target only a fraction of the data while producing the correct result for the rest of the data
There has been no error in the results of the top 100 candidates and the other 500 as well .... I am amazed by the fact that these so called computer error only occur in our educational and competitive institutions
There are billions of bank accounts in the world and millions of them are in Pakistan but never has there been a computer error resulting in addition of some amount to any particular account even in the presence of a bug known as Y2K
.. The computer is only blamed when the future of innocent and deserving candidates is at stake
How pathetic and unjust
..
@deovolente I fully agree with your point of view ... there are people in the top 100 that can't even articulate a simple English sentence ... the age limit should also be revised.. I am against the discrimination between the govt employees and the others as this discrimination is against the constitutional as well .... this result is totally out of order and needs to be challenged |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Assalamualaikum,
Many things to say, but due to shortage of stamina a few words only. I have been awarded a total of 780 marks. I wont even own this on the day of judgement in front of ALLAH. The real issue is that although FPSC has revised the result, this revision is nothing but a production. Its not that I was an underdog and now am not accepting the result, but because I am way too confident about my efforts. Even if some hounourable members of the forum would name it as our fate, I would say, I have never been so unlucky and so I dont own this fate also. But the fate thing is between me and ALLAH. I only want to address at present the issue between us and FPSC. Now we cannot blindly trust FPSC for all what has happened. 730 marks were only what I expected with poise and self-assurance, in my written exam. The real thing is that they could have adjusted our marks in accordance with the previous result only to pacify our reaction to this greatest misfortune in our lives. Hence I openly challenge this result. We shall not confine this challenge only to our DMSc because I wont stay contend with what marks are given in written. We shall be given equal rights to challenge our written marks. At the end of the day, if our accusations or allegations are proved wrong, it would yield two positives; 1. Satisfation to the disgruntled candidates, 2. Integrity of FPSC, which was hitherto never dubious. I hereby through this forum invite all those candidates who consider that something awfully wrong has happened to them, so that we may devise a collective thought about this. P.S: Some of our talented friends have very strong arguments and reasons to prove that there were gross violations of rights. Quote:
__________________
We have to distrust each other. It is our only defence against betrayal... Last edited by Andrew Dufresne; Saturday, June 19, 2010 at 01:20 PM. Reason: Merged |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
We cant compare FPSC with UPSC of India. In CSS around 10,000 candidates appear in the exam whereas in India about 3, 00,000 candidates appear in the exam of IAS. Moreover, vastness of their territory and population are other factors for not comparing them with FPSC.
Anyhow, I understand the feelings of those candidates who have no chances of allocation but instead of blaming institution please wait for your DMSs and it is not the standard to blame FPSC that your students surpassed you in merit order or someone has not command over speaking English. There is possibility of favoritism in awarding interview marks but these are discretionary powers of Chairman and Members and cant be challenged in any court and they are not answerable. If you people remind the case of Arsalan Iftikhar, his father was CJP, his papers were produced in Balochistan High Court first time in history, but no avail. I advise you to accept the reality. Nothing will happen, if something is not in your luck and favor then leave it and accept the fact. It will hurt you to stick to the past. It is part of past, prepare for future sincerely Insha Allah you will be awarded. If someone has exhausted all the attempts then consider it a blessing in disguise perhaps there will be something better than it in you life
__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
G.K objectives for all | terminator | Topics and Notes | 18 | Friday, January 21, 2022 01:35 AM |
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present | Sumairs | Pakistan Affairs | 13 | Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM |
Solved Everyday Science Papers | Dilrauf | General Science & Ability | 4 | Friday, April 08, 2011 06:10 PM |
Influence of joint family system on socio-economic development of Pakistan | hanif.sadia | News & Articles | 0 | Tuesday, February 16, 2010 01:58 PM |
The Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources | free thinker | Pakistan Affairs | 1 | Tuesday, April 25, 2006 08:05 AM |