Brother to be honest, I am not looking for any ordinary allocation. I am also not of the opinion that anything could be done about it now. And this is dillema of our society that nothing can be done. However I am assertive about my performance in written exam. I would never concede to it whatever our honourable members may think about it, and I assure you people that I am not the only one.

The real thing is that FPSC did nt bring any key change as to avoid any full-size dissent. However there were major discrepencies, intentional or whatever.

Its also not a matter of waiting for DMSc, because the merit announced in the so-called ammended result could be made in accordance to the first one. I would only put one question to our respected members;

What is the guarantee that the marks of the written part really belongs to one, to whom given? In consolidating the marks of individual papers, or whatever step, can we have any kind of guarantee that the process was transparent, or in other words, if someone wont like the authenticity of FPSC to be challenged, can we have any kind of guarantee that there were no discrepencies?

Brother its not about accepting reality. Even if we dont, we have to live with it. I know nothing could be done about it, but by staying silent and not complaining also wont be a good idea.

Result is a bit shocking,,,,,,,,,,....


I cant say anything .........


I am 42th in sindh( r)......I stand contented.....but sad over many friends' low ranking...................i too was a little shocked as i was expected to go much upper.....................

I have left everything in the hands of Allah....the supreme judge...

Best of luck...

__________________
"Man shall have nothing but what he strives for". (Al-Quran. Al-Najm:39).


"""""SHIKAARI BUNNA SHIKAAR BUNNAY SE BEHTTAR HAI"""""""

(x) Answer Books in all subjects of examination are confidential
documents and cannot, therefore, be permitted to be seen by
candidates or their representatives nor re-examination of answerbooks/scripts is allowed under any circumstances. A candidate desirous of getting his/her marks, awarded by the examiners, recounted may submit his/her request for the purpose, within one month from the date of issue of result card/marks sheet alongwith a Treasury Challan of Rs. 200/- per paper as fee for re-counting of marks only. Thereafter, no such request will be entertained.

We have no other option except to trust on the credibility of FPSC. You prepared for CSS Exam because you had trust on FPSC, qualified the written exam and you had trust on FPSC that is why you appeared in interview.

Dear, we are with you if there is something concrete to prove the discrepancies in FPSC otherwise it will be merely an attempt to demoralize the new aspirants. One of your fellows had some secrets but he is reluctant to disclose the big things. We should be done, and what are the allegation to inform the media, people and start an organized campaign plz enlighten us.

__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness.

This is what I want to eleborate. That the answer sheets could not be viewed by any candidate or any representative on his part, we shall not expect any positive outcome.

Although showing the answer sheets can have serious repercussions, but thats not the cure in itself. However there can be many alternatives to address such an issue. And keeping in mind the current ambiguities in the result which the FPSC has by its action endorsed itself, there should be an out of way mechanism. It wont harm FPSC. And if some1s right is violated, be it intentional or by mere mismanagement, it must be rectified.

The thing is, nothing could be done, but its such a shock for me that I cannot reconcile to it so easily, maybe with the passage of time.

Yes I prepared for exam because I had in my mind the credibility of FPSC and then appeared for the interview for the same reason, but now that very belief has been shattered within me. I am not a lone example in this regard.

And brother how could I come up with any evidence, but the cancellation of result is in itself and evidence to all such discripencies. The demotion of some candidates another evidence, and sorrows of some very talented fellows another and the list goes on.

One thing I tell u with conviction; This was not a computer generated fault. FPSC credibility I never challenged when I could nt pass 07 exam. Still today I am not challenging it w.r.t my result, but what has happened in the past few days is crystal clear.

I am dog-tired, running out of thoughts.

Best Regards

__________________
We have to distrust each other. It is our only defence against betrayal...

This is the main factor which proves Kukikhel's point of view.

__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna."
"Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain"

i got 830 marks from punjab and there is no chance of my allocation.i am upset with this situation. plz do pray for me as i have also appeared in css2010 may i get something better this year.The real flaw of the policy is that there is complete wastage of all those candidates who quailfed and not allocated. This is really shocking situtation for me

may allah almighty help u this time n honored you with your wish

@ raz

brother i can understand your feelings.the names of candidates you highlighted in this thread all belong to sind rural.does this happened to only candidates of sindh?

i also belong to sind rural.But i am female.i gave exams in 2010.Reading all the comments of qualifying candidates,it dragged me to worrisome situation.if such deserving candidates are downgraded then what will happen to the average cadidates like me.i believe everything happens for a good reason.best of luck brother.u will get what u deserve inshAllah.

__________________
I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have

No, not all the candidates belong to Sindh, there are lot of other examples too. I mentioned their names as a sample.

Thanks for best wishes.

__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna."
"Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain"

whats done is done.
it cannot be undone. css exams and its results are always unpredictable.
even i cannot believe few positions and marks scored by candidates but its a fact now.
nothing can be done.challenging will not yield anything.
but revised result has left some questions which need to be answered.
i think fpsc should clear its position. they tried to some extent.



‘Glitch’ forces revision of CSS results
LAHORE, June 18: The Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC), in an unheard of move, on Friday amended the results of the Central Superior Services examinations, causing a heartbreak for 13 candidates as their positions stood downgraded.

The FPSC put down the error to a “system-related glitch”. The positions of 266 candidates had ‘correctly been identified as a result of re-checking of the record’, a statement said. The 266 candidates were placed between 102 and 380 on the merit list.

The results had been announced on Tuesday. However, the FPSC withdrew the list from its website on Thursday.

Of the 266 candidates, 13 candidates’ positions have been downgraded.

The top 101 positions remained unchanged. Positions from 381 to 895 also were not affected.

The FPSC had announced the final results of CSS, 2009, for posts under the federal government in BPS-17 on June 15. However, the results were withdrawn from the website on Thursday.

As the revised results were posted on commission’s website on Friday, the commission’s secrecy wing stated that it discovered a small percentage of system generated error in the results.

The secrecy wing stated that it extensively crosschecked the declared results and developed a revised result showing roll numbers, merit positions, names, domiciles and marks of the candi dates, who have qualified the CSS examinations, 2009.

The comparison of the results posted on FPSC website on June 15 and June 18 show that 13 candidates’ positions have been downgraded.

The candidates falling at 102 to 108 merit positions – Malik Ishfaq Khan (Khyber Pakhtoonkhawa), Shah Jehan (Balochistan), Muhammad Asif Azeem, Hussnain Khalid and Saba Asghar Ali (Punjab), Sumair Noor and Ayaz Ali (Sindh rural) – have fallen on 201 to 207 positions.

While, the candidates falling at 109 to 114 merit positions – Iram Saleemi (Punjab), Aftab Ahmad Khan (NAFATA), Syed Khizar Mohsin Shah and Syed Mosawwir Abbas Shah (Punjab), Kamran Khan (Sindh rural) and Mirza Hussain (Balochistan) – have fallen on 375 to 380 positions.

A few candidates, who spoke to Dawn on the condition of anonymity, said that they smelt a rat in the revision of results as it was done for the first time in the history of the commission. They said the result revision had created confusion among them.According to FCPS data on the CSS examination 2009, 9,056 candidates had applied, of whom 5,707 (63 per cent) appeared for the examination. Of them, 905 candidates (15.85 per cent) qualified the written test. In the final result after a psychological test and an interview, 895 candidates (683 males and 212 females), including one disabled, qualified the examination.

Overall top three positions have been clinched by the Punjab residents. Muhammad Bin Ashraf bagged the first position with 995 marks, while Dr Najamus Sehar and Asma Ghazanfar Butt secured second and third positions with 990 and 986 marks

source:http://www.columnpk.com/%E2%80%98gli...f-css-results/

__________________
Reality is something you rise above.