Sunday, April 18, 2021
01:02 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2011 Exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Saimaawan is on a distinguished road
Exclamation The Unethical practice of defferring the allocation!

The Unethical practice of defferring the allocation!

Dear seniors and friends!

I would like to know your precious opinion on the practice of deferring the allocation. Don't you think (though legal) it's unethical???Because it has been observed that the person who defers his joining CTP usually does not join next year too and in this way the vacancy is wasted! and Above all the labour and hardwork of a candidate (i.e next in merit) is wasted as well, who would have joined if the allocated candidate had not deferred his joining.

I know a guy who was in our university, he was from a very humble background and had worked extremely hard to do CSS despite poverty and all sorts of problems. But friends, he could not come on merit, e.g he was on 81st position where as vacancies were only 80 and thus he neded the withdrawl of one allocated candidate to get the allocation . There was one allocated candidate, who was already in BPS 17 and was not interested in the allocated group and that’s why he had no intensions to join CTP that year or the next year. Everyone was sure about him that he would not join and he would refuse it. But despite it, instead of refusing and giving chance to that poor guy who was on 81st position, that allocated candidate decided to defer his joining. Later on he did not join next year too and in this way the vacancy was wasted!!!! The person on 81st position who badly needed allocation remained jobless for sometime and ultimately surrendered! yes dear friends he committed suicide!!! After his death his family is suffering in abject poverty today.I am an eye witness to this real story.

Dear friends every year in CSS, there are some allocated candidates who are already in good jobs, and owing to the fact that they don't get good groups they defer it, despite the fact that they don't have any intensions to join next year either! In my humble opinion, they must think about it. They should exercise only two options ---One: JOIN, Second: Refuse! they should not defer! Because their decsion to defer may cost another Life and the sufferings of generations of a family.And their decision to refuse and give chance to the candidate next in merit may save the future of a person and a family!

Your precious opinion views are welcome on this issue!

Last edited by Shooting Star; Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 03:21 PM. Reason: write in sentence case only.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Saimaawan For This Useful Post:
ahmar bhatti (Wednesday, August 29, 2012), Arslan Shaukat (Tuesday, August 28, 2012), mano g (Tuesday, August 28, 2012), sarfaraz shami (Tuesday, August 28, 2012)
  #2  
Old Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,545
Thanks: 764
Thanked 1,265 Times in 674 Posts
VetDoctor is a name known to allVetDoctor is a name known to allVetDoctor is a name known to allVetDoctor is a name known to allVetDoctor is a name known to allVetDoctor is a name known to all
Default

first of all thanx a lot for raising ur voice regarding such an important issue... i will second ur views. is somebody is already on a good job and he is just taking css examination to become DMG/PAS officer, or PSP, so if he z not allocated in these group he/she should stright away inform the commission/establishment div....
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VetDoctor For This Useful Post:
mano g (Tuesday, August 28, 2012)
  #3  
Old Tuesday, August 28, 2012
mano g's Avatar
40th CTP (DMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 51
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 681
Thanks: 771
Thanked 1,424 Times in 486 Posts
mano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to beholdmano g is a splendid one to behold
Default

Agreed! Deferring ctp should not be allowed, candidates must set their priorities, If they are coming to the service then these crucial decisions should be made keeping in view all aspects of their personal as well as professional life.....if for emergency basis (rare) it is inevitable to defer ctp in a certain year, then it should be allowed just for one year, instead of three...with the increased competition, obsolete rules should also be changed!
__________________
what humbugs we r,who pretend to live for beauty and never see the dawn :)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Tuesday, August 28, 2012
40th CTP (MLCG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 76
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Posts: 82
Thanks: 83
Thanked 115 Times in 42 Posts
wahab_ahqar is on a distinguished road
Default

I am really sorry to hear about the person you quoted who lost his life. In my opinion, there is no harm in deferring the allocation if one has the intention to go for it in case one doesn't improve ones group or whatever are the circumstances.

In CSA you are not allowed to reappear and majority of the candidates defer it because they want to go for next attempt to improve. In these cases it is quite justified to defer and keep the option in your hand which you earned through your hard work and with Allah's blessing.

Last edited by wahab_ahqar; Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 05:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Wednesday, August 29, 2012
ahmar bhatti's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 40
Thanks: 7
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
ahmar bhatti is on a distinguished road
Default

I tend to agree with your view. People should be confident and strong enough to make the hard choices and then live by their consequences. If the bureaucracy is really what it claims to be i.e. a frame of steel- then the people becoming a part of it should have the will of an iron-man. If someone decides to become a part of the civil services then one should gratefully accept whatever group one is allocated and not take subsequent attempts. However, if one is vying only for one of the most coveted groups then one should not even bother putting down other groups in the preference form. In this manner, there would be no need for deferring CTP. But as long as the FPSC does not get rid of such outdated policies one has every right to defer CTP.

P.S.
Please accept my condolences for your friend. It is indeed very sad to learn of such talent going to waste like that. But committing suicide is not the solution. It's just an easy way out of a difficult situation. My heart goes out to the bereaved family but I feel no sympathy for the poor departed soul.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ahmar bhatti For This Useful Post:
VetDoctor (Wednesday, August 29, 2012)
  #6  
Old Saturday, September 01, 2012
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Skylimit is on a distinguished road
Default

It really depends. Yes, you are right to an extent that deferrals must not be allowed without any genuine reason. However, if there is then no harm to allow people to defer to next term.

What about people who are maybe abroad for their masters and they have intention to come back after a year? Deferrals definitely sound right for them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab sajidnuml Constitutional Law 5 Saturday, November 11, 2017 05:00 PM
Various posts announced by kpk psc... nafees khattak KPKPMS 8 Thursday, July 13, 2017 08:07 PM
KPK PSC: Adv. No.03 / 2011, Due Date: 23-07-2011 prestigious KPKPMS 4 Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:12 PM
2010 Human Rights Report: Pakistan khuhro News & Articles 0 Saturday, April 16, 2011 10:12 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.