CSS Forums

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)
-   CSS 2012 Exam (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-datesheets-results/previous-css-results-datesheets/css-2012-exam/)
-   -   Why 2 POST-G seats of Sindh (R) are still vacant? (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-datesheets-results/previous-css-results-datesheets/css-2012-exam/83454-why-2-post-g-seats-sindh-r-still-vacant.html)

Poseidon Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:35 AM

Why 2 POST-G seats of Sindh (R) are still vacant?
 
When there are a number of qualified candidates hailing from Sindh (R) waiting for allocations, then why the 2 seats of postal group are still lying vacant? More than 60 candidates are not allocated. Isn't there any one (or two) among them who could deserve the least share in allocations! Despite qualifying all the stages, isn't there anyone SUITABLE for postal! That's very strange and embarrassing... Does anyone know the reason?

aniya warraich Sunday, September 01, 2013 12:11 AM

[QUOTE=Poseidon;639789]When there are a number of qualified candidates hailing from Sindh (R) waiting for allocations, then why the 2 seats of postal group are still lying vacant? More than 60 candidates are not allocated. Isn't there any one (or two) among them who could deserve the least share in allocations! Despite qualifying all the stages, isn't there anyone SUITABLE for postal! That's very strange and embarrassing... Does anyone know the reason?[/QUOTE]

Two seats of Postal are vacant in Sindh urban too...And we have enough vacancies to get everyone allocated here...!

shary16 Sunday, September 01, 2013 12:55 AM

[QUOTE=Poseidon;639789]When there are a number of qualified candidates hailing from Sindh (R) waiting for allocations, then why the 2 seats of postal group are still lying vacant? More than 60 candidates are not allocated. Isn't there any one (or two) among them who could deserve the least share in allocations! Despite qualifying all the stages, isn't there anyone SUITABLE for postal! That's very strange and embarrassing... Does anyone know the reason?[/QUOTE]

Yes that might be the reason. they must have been declared 'not suitable' for civil service.. because its not possible that all unallocated aspirants did not volunteer for postal group!

shary16 Sunday, September 01, 2013 07:13 AM

well its also impossible that all 60 candidates were deemed unfit. No plausible explanations!

may be in the reallocation list the anomaly will be corrected.


11:56 PM (GMT +5)

vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.