Passed in CE 2013 But not Allocated Report Here
 

I am Atif Fawad and My merit number is 194... not allocated in CE-2013

How come?i mean there are many candidates whose merit number is lower than yours but they still are located.

[QUOTE=atiffawad;722077]I am Atif Fawad and My merit number is 194... not allocated in CE-2013[/QUOTE]
Merit number 202 from Punjab is allocated in postal group. Why would you not be???

[QUOTE=atiffawad;722077]I am Atif Fawad and My merit number is 194... not allocated in CE-2013[/QUOTE]

You belong to which domicile

[QUOTE=usmanwrites;722101]Merit number 202 from Punjab is allocated in postal group. Why would you not be???[/QUOTE]

Maybe because of his preferences. He might not have given Postal Services in his preferences.

Merit list after interview or after written test

Sent from my GT-S7562 using Tapatalk

Sir thay give a choice to change preference at the time of interview

Sent from my GT-S7562 using Tapatalk

[quote=husseych;722159]you belong to which domicile[/quote]
punjab

[QUOTE=AHKK;722257]Maybe because of his preferences. He might not have given Postal Services in his preferences.[/QUOTE]
i had given all of the 12 preferences

[QUOTE=atiffawad;722361]i had given all of the 12 preferences[/QUOTE]

Thats very strange then . Expecting seniors to comment on this unusual situation of yours

202 6798 AMTUL MUSSAWER


Why not you , seems strange. Contact TS Awan , his email I'd is in his profile.

[QUOTE=atiffawad;722077]I am Atif Fawad and My merit number is 194... not allocated in CE-2013[/QUOTE]
Oh! This is so strange, you should contact FPSC urgently.

[QUOTE=atiffawad;722077]I am Atif Fawad and My merit number is 194... not allocated in CE-2013[/QUOTE]
It happens almost every year. Due to the inclusion of PSP and FSP in boys' preferences, their preference number for Postal is below than most of the girls' preferences. Thats why girls with lower merit number get allocated in Postal and Boys with higher merit do not get it.
Told by ED person when asked from him after our allocations were announced.

Not allocated
 

May be the one who is selected has kept postal in [COLOR="DarkRed"]upper preferences[/COLOR] as compared to the preference list of Atif

[QUOTE=ShirazaH86;722497]It happens almost every year. Due to the inclusion of PSP and FSP in boys' preferences, their preference number for Postal is below than most of the girls' preferences. Thats why girls with lower merit number get allocated in Postal and Boys with higher merit do not get it.
Told by ED person when asked from him after our allocations were announced.[/QUOTE]

We all people failed in the very first written exam of CSS, however, Atif managed to pass but he could not be allocated. It is really a BIG jhatka. So, please suggest us what should be the group of preference to be at safe side. It is a lesson for us who are likely to make written exam. Thanks.

[QUOTE=flyer;722611]We all people failed in the very first written exam of CSS, however, Atif managed to pass but he could not be allocated. It is really a BIG jhatka. So, please suggest us what should be the group of preference to be at safe side. It is a lesson for us who are likely to make written exam. Thanks.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mini98;722548]May be the one who is selected has kept postal in [COLOR="DarkRed"]upper preferences[/COLOR] as compared to the preference list of Atif[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ShirazaH86;722497]It happens almost every year. Due to the inclusion of PSP and FSP in boys' preferences, their preference number for Postal is below than most of the girls' preferences. Thats why girls with lower merit number get allocated in Postal and Boys with higher merit do not get it.
Told by ED person when asked from him after our allocations were announced.[/QUOTE]

I don't think it could be the case. as the respected member is at 194th number so jab inki bari aye hogi to still postal mein vacancy rhti thi and as he wrote he mentioned Postal as well, so even if Postal was his last preference , according to rules he should be given . It is either a big mistake or any other issue such as during interview it might be establish that he is not fit for Postal and Railway group e.g .

and yad aya there is another guy at number 183 in Punjab, who is not given any group .
Whatever the case maybe, it is awkward situation . Brother Atif please contact FPSC and also tell us about their response as it is bit strange for young aspirants like me .

First of all my sympathies for Mr. Atif it is indeed very unfortunate that he couldn't get any group allocated to him despite making it all the way, as far as merit could take him.
The argument presented by Mr. Sheraz or the one presented to him by someone else does not stand because no matter at what number of preference anyone lower on the merit list places any particular group, if a candidate higher on the list has also put it on his list of choices then he must get it before anyone lower on the list, provided that any quota conditions don't come into play. In this particular case if Mr. Atif could not get allocated in any other group of his choice, but still wrote the Postal service be it at the bottom, he should've gotten selected before others who came in 196th & 202nd on the merit list in the provincial quota of Punjab in that service. Even if the said service group was first on their list of choices.
Why he didn't get it is beyond me, perhaps there's some other condition that we are not aware of or may be overlooking. I suggest Mr. Atif to approach the FPSC in person as soon as possible and inquire into this matter. Best of luck to him and us all.
Mr. Atif please keep us posted about any developments.

s
 

seats allocation ka method kesa hota hay:dds

Merit NO 217 but not allocated

One need to have at least 700 marks in written to get allocation on punjab seats.So just passing wriiten will not confirm your job.

merit NO 219,220 are allocated due to sindh domicile.

i think Atif will have some issues with his security clearence. otherwise there is no other option to mark him "unallocated".

Atif should visit the FPSC in person. wastage of time will put him in denial of allocation.

[QUOTE=Eng_abid hussain;722912]i think Atif will have some issues with his security clearence. otherwise there is no other option to mark him "unallocated".

Atif should visit the FPSC in person. wastage of time will put him in denial of allocation.[/QUOTE]

Security clearance means?

[QUOTE=flyer;723014]Security clearance means?[/QUOTE]

any criminal background etc

[QUOTE=husseych;723032]any criminal background etc[/QUOTE]

Oh! it means police cases wagera?

it is due to trickle down effect of women quota...
it is sin if you are a male candidate and if you are from Punjab then it is a bigger sin.

[QUOTE=atiffawad;723753]it is due to trickle down effect of women quota...
it is sin if you are a male candidate and if you are from Punjab then it is a bigger sin.[/QUOTE]

Can u quote your Dmc here??

I do not get this. There were 5 vacancies in open merit for Punjab. Why would females get these open merit seats ahead of their male counterparts, who had higher merit number than them?

champions of Female rights = FPSC
 

Fpsc has become miserably champion of so called extra ordinary women rights...
with due respect of female aspirants I wonder why female candidates get extra seats in addition to female quota.. why fpsc has titled open merit in allocation procedure.. it should be titled as [B]"[B]Open [/B]merit[/B]" for male candidates but "[B]A special concession for female[/B]"..
it is highly unjustifiable...

[QUOTE=Elspeth;723809]Can u quote your Dmc here??[/QUOTE]
Essay 50
English II 42
GKI 55
GkII 18
GKIII 50
islamiyat 57

geography I & II 30 + 40 = 70
Punjabi 78
Int'l Law 54
Persian I&II 73+67 = 140
sub total 614
interview 130

total 744

[QUOTE=atiffawad;724530]Essay 50
English II 42
GKI 55
GkII 18
GKIII 50
islamiyat 57

geography I & II 30 + 40 = 70
Punjabi 78
Int'l Law 54
Persian I&II 73+67 = 140
sub total 614
interview 130

total 744[/QUOTE]


Dear Atif! I request you to please contact me. I need to talk to you. I am Muhammad Ghayyur Akbar Khan Merit No 183 and not allocated due to trickle down effect.

Please contact me or provide your E-mail ID etc as the members on cssforum are not allowed to exchange contact numbers I think.

Atif and ghyuur
I think you both must go to court and present your case there.. It is highly an unjust act of fpsc that they discriminate boys and girls in the so called open merit.

[QUOTE=Ghayyur;724550]Dear Atif! I request you to please contact me. I need to talk to you. I am Muhammad Ghayyur Akbar Khan Merit No 183 and not allocated due to trickle down effect.

Please contact me or provide your E-mail ID etc as the members on cssforum are not allowed to exchange contact numbers I think.[/QUOTE]
please email me your cell number....

[email]atiffawad@hotmail.com[/email]

I guess courts wont help those who hv punjab domicile...The trickle down rule is based upon a 2008-09 case decided by Lahore high court and then upheld by supreme court according to which if a female candidate vacates an open merit seat of a province and avails women quota seat then only another female can be allocated on the vacated open merit seat..This is what FPSC calls trickle down.so i dnt think punjab domiciled candidates can successfully challenge it.However, the case of KPK domiciled guy is different, a girl vacated open merit seat and availed women quota seat but there is no girl left to avail vacated open merit seat so, one postal group open merit seat is still left but FPSC has not allocated that seat to anyone as no female candidate is available.Supreme court guidelines regarding such a situation arent on record and can be challenged by the affected male candidates:-)

[QUOTE=Schandenfreud;728109]I guess courts wont help those who hv punjab domicile...The trickle down rule is based upon a 2008-09 case decided by Lahore high court and then upheld by supreme court according to which if a female candidate vacates an open merit seat of a province and avails women quota seat then only another female can be allocated on the vacated open merit seat..This is what FPSC calls trickle down.so i dnt think punjab domiciled candidates can successfully challenge it.However, the case of KPK domiciled guy is different, a girl vacated open merit seat and availed women quota seat but there is no girl left to avail vacated open merit seat so, one postal group open merit seat is still left but FPSC has not allocated that seat to anyone as no female candidate is available.Supreme court guidelines regarding such a situation arent on record and can be challenged by the affected male candidates:-)[/QUOTE]


That's just sheer injustice and pathetic rule yar!!

Means it's a loose loose for males and win win for females.

At least, if there's no female then give it to a guy

[QUOTE=Tashfeen Alam;728142]That's just sheer injustice and pathetic rule yar!!

Means it's a loose loose for males and win win for females.

At least, if there's no female then give it to a guy[/QUOTE]

sir, some mortals are more equal than others...:closedeye

[QUOTE=Ghayyur;724550]Dear Atif! I request you to please contact me. I need to talk to you. I am Muhammad Ghayyur Akbar Khan Merit No 183 and not allocated due to trickle down effect.

Please contact me or provide your E-mail ID etc as the members on cssforum are not allowed to exchange contact numbers I think.[/QUOTE]
Ghayyur will you plz share your DMC... Thanks