CSS Forums - Issuance of roll no. Slips: another fallacy on the part of FPSC.

In this year, number of aspirants have been rejected by fpsc for number of petty issues, including not sending documents. Furthermore, petitions of rejected candidates are being dealt with very much sternly and no concessions are being made with anyone. I wonder if it is the right way to treat a candidate in such a manner. FPSC can warn and even fine them for doing mistake, but why it has put a precious year of almost 1400 candidates on stake. Doing a mistake in subject selection, forgetting abt to send documents is not a big issue, and aspirants should not be severely punished for such petty mistakes as every human being is liable to them.
Keeping aside everything, one of my friend got rejected for CE-14. When he tried to search his roll no. on net, it was said that yours candidature has been rejected on the grounds already conveyed to you. However, he got his roll no. Slip through courier which is amazing. Kindly, can someone tell me about the logic of fpsc by doing so. FPSC should have placed the roll no slip also on net as those candidates who got rejected, did not receive their slip through courier, and wish to appear in the exam despite being rejected, can set in the exam. But the illogical tyranny is on the rife.
I personally believe that such acts are tantamount to discourage the potential candidates. People with excellent academic record will not hesitate for instance to turn away to rewardable sides if the result of CE-14 proves same as of 2013.