Thursday, March 28, 2024
03:30 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2016 Exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
jamalnasir's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 298
Thanks: 296
Thanked 241 Times in 131 Posts
jamalnasir is on a distinguished road
Default Sit in for CE2016 unjust result in front of FPSC offices

I appeared in CE2015 and then in CE2016. I know there were some flaw in my first attempt that I flunked, but in CE2016 I appeared with full zeal and complete preparation. After written I started preparation for interview because I was sure that I would clear that time, but astonished to see that again I flunked in Essay and composition papers. Even my essay which I wrote on the topic of gender equality is a myth was published in FPSC recommended magazine World Times and many senior bureaucrats like Sir Sarmad Saeed (rtd. AIG) appreciate my articles. Anyone can check my writing style from here:

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/general/n...dul-nasir.html


After CE2016 result I have come to know that FPSC is unjust and absurd department who deliberately fails candidates in one or two papers while neglecting their talent. I wanna arrange a procession to the FPSC offices for 3, 4 hours sit in, after 10 Muharam in October. It will not change CE2016 result, but may be next time they abandon this heinous act. Anyone who thinks that FPSC is an inequitable department, please join me for this just cause. Not only those candidates who appeared in CE2016, but anyone who thinks that FPSC is an inequitable department can join me. I'll go for sit in if minimum 200 brothers/sisters join me because it will look stupid if I alone go to procession.

Please reply who are with me and are ready to go for protest.
__________________
مجھے ہے حکمِ اذاں
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jamalnasir For This Useful Post:
aadil786 (Friday, October 07, 2016), blue berry (Friday, October 07, 2016), Innocent Heart (Friday, October 07, 2016), Jabbar Raheem (Friday, October 07, 2016), Rashida Fazal (Wednesday, October 12, 2016)
  #2  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Adnan AKRAM is on a distinguished road
Default

Don't waste your time in unfruitful pursuits. Sit in would not change the FPSC long standing policy. Rather focus your shortcomings and loopholes. Everyone knows FPSC target one or two subjects every year. There is nothing new or strange in it. It doesn't mean that they fail students deliberately in those papers but they select the best 200-300 papers in a specific subject. And its very important to shortlist 20000 students to maintain efficiency of the system. Every body hold some reservations but its better for you to adapt yourself to this policy rather waste your time to make FPSC realize the curse of this policy. A very simple remedy for you, try to be among top 200 in every paper. You will not complain like this in future. Writing articles in JW times is great but you can not claim automatic favor just for writing article in an average or below average level magzine. FPSC recommended JWT magazine only for current affairs and not for essay writing or precis. If you have any attempt left work hard for it and if it was your last attempt then CSS is not the end of world. Cheers
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Adnan AKRAM For This Useful Post:
blue berry (Friday, October 07, 2016), innoxentfahadi5 (Saturday, October 08, 2016), Rashida Fazal (Wednesday, October 12, 2016), shahhassanullah (Saturday, October 08, 2016), umerbhatiiiii (Friday, October 07, 2016), waheed baloch 7 (Thursday, November 03, 2016)
  #3  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 84
Thanks: 1
Thanked 49 Times in 34 Posts
In From The Cold is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adnan AKRAM View Post
Don't waste your time in unfruitful pursuits. Sit in would not change the FPSC long standing policy. Rather focus your shortcomings and loopholes. Everyone knows FPSC target one or two subjects every year. There is nothing new or strange in it. It doesn't mean that they fail students deliberately in those papers but they select the best 200-300 papers in a specific subject. And its very important to shortlist 20000 students to maintain efficiency of the system. Every body hold some reservations but its better for you to adapt yourself to this policy rather waste your time to make FPSC realize the curse of this policy. A very simple remedy for you, try to be among top 200 in every paper. You will not complain like this in future. Writing articles in JW times is great but you can not claim automatic favor just for writing article in an average or below average level magzine. FPSC recommended JWT magazine only for current affairs and not for essay writing or precis. If you have any attempt left work hard for it and if it was your last attempt then CSS is not the end of world. Cheers
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Karachi
Posts: 571
Thanks: 113
Thanked 233 Times in 166 Posts
Mohammad Ali is on a distinguished road
Default

All others just have fun and pass remarks asking to do more, only that student knows the real pain who has been the victim of FPSC's purposeful failing in one or two subjects to match its supposedly predetermined reduced percentage of passing candidates. In my view, Sana Rasool is the victim like one student who attained more than 70 marks in Precis but was meagerly awarded 07 in English Essay, ha, ha and ha. FPSC guys, are you for real? I personally commend FPSC for being free of corruption (maybe), but I cannot childishly, blindly praise FPSC if it commits a wrong and such a heinous wrong. The effective way to protest is to let everybody know this supposedly evil tactic of FPSC, and if possible, let the journalists know too. Elements within FPSC who are up to this needs to be thrown out and punished severely, because they are tarnishing a well-reputed image of FPSC.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mohammad Ali For This Useful Post:
aadil786 (Friday, October 07, 2016), Amicable (Friday, October 14, 2016), blue berry (Friday, October 07, 2016), Innocent Heart (Friday, October 07, 2016), jamalnasir (Friday, October 07, 2016)
  #5  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
jamalnasir's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 298
Thanks: 296
Thanked 241 Times in 131 Posts
jamalnasir is on a distinguished road
Default

Written part is for screening candidates for interview, it's not right to deliberately fail candidates that they don't have enough time to interview. If someone couldn't allocated, then he/she should be adjusted in other departments' 17 scale jobs. The best time of FPSC was during Rana Bhagwandas when 8-9 percent candidates were passed. My English is better than my friend who allocated in CE2014, whose name I'll not mention here, but how he allocated, but I flunked?

I think to arrange 3, 4 hours for raising our voise against unfair acts of FPSC is not wastage of time.
__________________
مجھے ہے حکمِ اذاں
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jamalnasir For This Useful Post:
aadil786 (Friday, October 07, 2016)
  #6  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Introvert
Posts: 235
Thanks: 47
Thanked 88 Times in 66 Posts
Bonaparte is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adnan AKRAM View Post
Don't waste your time in unfruitful pursuits. Sit in would not change the FPSC long standing policy. Rather focus your shortcomings and loopholes. Everyone knows FPSC target one or two subjects every year. There is nothing new or strange in it. It doesn't mean that they fail students deliberately in those papers but they select the best 200-300 papers in a specific subject. And its very important to shortlist 20000 students to maintain efficiency of the system. Every body hold some reservations but its better for you to adapt yourself to this policy rather waste your time to make FPSC realize the curse of this policy. A very simple remedy for you, try to be among top 200 in every paper. You will not complain like this in future. Writing articles in JW times is great but you can not claim automatic favor just for writing article in an average or below average level magzine. FPSC recommended JWT magazine only for current affairs and not for essay writing or precis. If you have any attempt left work hard for it and if it was your last attempt then CSS is not the end of world. Cheers

Well, I dont want to argue with you however, I ll just say FPSC has no proper paper checking criteria and under article 19-A we have right to information regarding such pathetic paper checking policy by FPSC. Saying work hard or covering loopholes sound easy for you but what if you produce best material in paper and it later turns out to be a nightmare for you? Even Cambridge examination branch has proper mechanism for paper checking as well as marking and grading but FPSC is living in dark ages.
In conclusion, FPSC must devise proper policy in order to overcome its flaw rules particularly in paper checking or else it raise many questions over its credibility.

Please check this site.
http://www.cie.org.uk/cambridge-for/...g-and-grading/
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bonaparte For This Useful Post:
aadil786 (Friday, October 07, 2016), jamalnasir (Friday, October 07, 2016)
  #7  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
jamalnasir's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 298
Thanks: 296
Thanked 241 Times in 131 Posts
jamalnasir is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adnan AKRAM View Post
Don't waste your time in unfruitful pursuits. Sit in would not change the FPSC long standing policy. Rather focus your shortcomings and loopholes. Everyone knows FPSC target one or two subjects every year. There is nothing new or strange in it. It doesn't mean that they fail students deliberately in those papers but they select the best 200-300 papers in a specific subject. And its very important to shortlist 20000 students to maintain efficiency of the system. Every body hold some reservations but its better for you to adapt yourself to this policy rather waste your time to make FPSC realize the curse of this policy. A very simple remedy for you, try to be among top 200 in every paper. You will not complain like this in future. Writing articles in JW times is great but you can not claim automatic favor just for writing article in an average or below average level magzine. FPSC recommended JWT magazine only for current affairs and not for essay writing or precis. If you have any attempt left work hard for it and if it was your last attempt then CSS is not the end of world. Cheers

Brother please take a glance at my essay, it's available on that address which I mentioned above, it's not beyond your access. In gender equality I didn't solely focused on females, but also covered eunuchs, and males also. Please describe after reading that was my essay not up to standards?
__________________
مجھے ہے حکمِ اذاں
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Muhammad Bilal Anwar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 367
Thanks: 75
Thanked 75 Times in 63 Posts
Muhammad Bilal Anwar is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamalnasir View Post
Brother please take a glance at my essay, it's available on that address which I mentioned above, it's not beyond your access. In gender equality I didn't solely focused on females, but also covered eunuchs, and males also. Please describe after reading that was my essay not up to standards?

pleade share your DMC of ce 2016 in relevant section.
__________________
Our life's a stage, a comedy: either learn to play and take it lightly, or bear its troubles patiently.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Karachi
Posts: 571
Thanks: 113
Thanked 233 Times in 166 Posts
Mohammad Ali is on a distinguished road
Default

I request all concerned candidates not to sit back after a day or two passes, move on with your rightful protest. Check out the DMCs of most students, FPSC fails candidates in either English Essay or Precis to match the supposedly predetermined reduced percentage of passing candidates. Earlier it was not so, but this trend has been on the rise for the last two to three years. Keep telling this to everyone so that FPSC does not do this to CE-2017 candidates. While you all are stupidly studying harder and harder, FPSC is doing the same thing over and over -- failing you in one of the compulsory subjects to adjust the results with the supposedly pre-planned rate of 2%. I may probably take part in CE-2017 exam and I am afraid FPSC will do this to me too, but I will definitely not let this happen, I will keep all journalists informed, and everybody I can inform, I will. The results of Sana Rasool and many others are glaring examples of the wrongdoing.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mohammad Ali For This Useful Post:
aadil786 (Friday, October 07, 2016)
  #10  
Old Friday, October 07, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: faisalabad
Posts: 83
Thanks: 33
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
kainth is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamalnasir View Post
I appeared in CE2015 and then in CE2016. I know there were some flaw in my first attempt that I flunked, but in CE2016 I appeared with full zeal and complete preparation. After written I started preparation for interview because I was sure that I would clear that time, but astonished to see that again I flunked in Essay and composition papers. Even my essay which I wrote on the topic of gender equality is a myth was published in FPSC recommended magazine World Times and many senior bureaucrats like Sir Sarmad Saeed (rtd. AIG) appreciate my articles. Anyone can check my writing style from here:

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/general/n...dul-nasir.html


After CE2016 result I have come to know that FPSC is unjust and absurd department who deliberately fails candidates in one or two papers while neglecting their talent. I wanna arrange a procession to the FPSC offices for 3, 4 hours sit in, after 10 Muharam in October. It will not change CE2016 result, but may be next time they abandon this heinous act. Anyone who thinks that FPSC is an inequitable department, please join me for this just cause. Not only those candidates who appeared in CE2016, but anyone who thinks that FPSC is an inequitable department can join me. I'll go for sit in if minimum 200 brothers/sisters join me because it will look stupid if I alone go to procession.

Please reply who are with me and are ready to go for protest.
Which essay jamal did you attempt in css 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kainth For This Useful Post:
Akbaloch (Saturday, October 08, 2016)
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
List of Militant Organisations A Rehman Pal International Relations 0 Saturday, March 17, 2007 04:45 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.