CSS Forums

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)
-   CSS 2016 Exam (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-datesheets-results/previous-css-results-datesheets/css-2016-exam/)
-   -   Total students in CE 2016? (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-datesheets-results/previous-css-results-datesheets/css-2016-exam/107971-total-students-ce-2016-a.html)

Samix Monday, February 29, 2016 08:25 PM

Total students in CE 2016?
 
How many students have registered in Css 2016 any idea? And how many of them have appeared in papers?

Sent from my H30-U10 using Tapatalk

Farooq baloch Monday, February 29, 2016 08:35 PM

[QUOTE=Samix;916458]How many students have registered in Css 2016 any idea? And how many of them have appeared in papers?

Sent from my H30-U10 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]

About 25000 candidates had applied

Samix Monday, February 29, 2016 08:35 PM

Oh I thought around 15000

Sent from my H30-U10 using Tapatalk

Mrkhansaab Monday, February 29, 2016 08:46 PM

Around 20,000 to 25,000 must have applied this year, but about less than half would have [B]actually appeared[/B], as has happened in the last 2-3 years.

The trend over the last 4 years is as follows:

[B]Year---Candidates appeared [/B]
2012: 10066
2013: 11406
2014: 13170
2015: 12176

There was a huge surge in CSS popularity near 2010, however it seems to have peaked (currently) in 2013 with 13,170 candidates actually appearing.

My guess would be that this year about [U]11,000-12,000 [/U]candidates would have appeared.

Farooq baloch Monday, February 29, 2016 08:53 PM

[QUOTE=Mrkhansaab;916470]Around 20,000 to 25,000 must have applied this year, but about less than half would have [B]actually appeared[/B], as has happened in the last 2-3 years.

The trend over the last 4 years is as follows:

[B]Year---Candidates appeared [/B]
2012: 10066
2013: 11406
2014: 13170
2015: 12176

There was a huge surge in CSS popularity near 2010, however it seems to have peaked (currently) in 2013 with 13,170 candidates actually appearing.

My guess would be that this year about [U]11,000-12,000 [/U]candidates would have appeared.[/QUOTE]
you are right many candidate just applied and not appeared

zealot Monday, February 29, 2016 09:06 PM

What would be the reason.i appeared in 2015 and many candidates wrote "absent" on attendence paper

yasirisrar Tuesday, March 01, 2016 12:21 PM

This year many candidates did not appeared for exams. There were even some individuals who attempted the first two papers of ce:2016 only and were absent in the rest. My guess around 10k would have actually given the entire exam :waiting

zealot Tuesday, March 01, 2016 12:47 PM

Fools rush where angels fear to tread..a damp sqiub ....whistle dixing in exam hall would give them fools gold.only the chance they would consume.....

abbas khan 119 Tuesday, March 01, 2016 01:06 PM

[QUOTE=yasirisrar;916645]This year many candidates did not appeared for exams. There were even some individuals who attempted the first two papers of ce:2016 only and were absent in the rest. My guess around 10k would have actually given the entire exam :waiting[/QUOTE]
you are right bro, my roll no. In 2014 was 19k plus and this time the same was 16k plus. It means the people applied this year were 4k less than the previous years. Those actually appeared were also fewer than the previous ratio.

étoile brillante Tuesday, March 01, 2016 01:25 PM

can this effect the alocations in anyway?


10:44 AM (GMT +5)

vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.