Yes brother this is the only option we r left with ... Pl ask ur other friends to send petitions by post ... The more , the better ... I am sure a large number of petitions would force them into action ...

Dear sir you are absolutely right. Let me share with you a tiny piece of information. when kp topper of 2015, merit no. 23, was going for ctp, he wrote on his wall: adios Peshawar. Likewise merit no.9, 2014, writes like this: he is a man that wants to.... ”9ý7

__________________
winners never quit, and quitters never win.

@Tenacious thanks for pointing out my flaws.





Dear Zealot, FPSC conducts exams on federal level. There are provincial public service commissions who conduct exams for every province separately, so no need to mention this issue.



I have finalized the petition. Inshallah tomorrow will dispatch to Senate public petition cell. My request to all friends is that they also send petitions. Please attach your CNIC copy and mention your name, CNIC number, PTCL number, mobile number, postal address, and E-mail address on the petition.



Postal address to send petition is:

Deputy Secretary, (Public Petition Table) Senate Secretariat, Parliament House, Islamabad, Pakistan.





Specimen of the petition is:




Mr. Raza Rabbani, Chairman Senate, Islamic Republic of Pakistan











Subject: Petition to bring reforms in Central Superior Services of Pakistan.





Respected sir,



I have to state that government has brought admirable reforms in the syllabus of prestigious CSS exams. But still there is a dire need to bring reforms in the whole Competitive Examination's procedure.


At the time of Rana Bhagwandas the passing ratio of candidates in written part of competitive examination was 8 to 9 percent, but in CE 2016 the passing ratio was only 2 percent. It does not mean that the abilities of highly qualified youth of Pakistan have been reduced, but FPSC decides the passing ratio before examination to reduce burden for the interview panel. As written part is the screening step for interview, so brilliant aspirants may not be deprived while screening a large number of candidates. In CE 2016 many talented doctors, engineers, lawyers, psychologists, and M.Phil scholars flunked in written part, if they would be passed, then they would serve the motherland in a better way.



On the other hand, there is no any procedure of rechecking of papers. There is only one option which is recounting, in which answer sheets are never shown to the aggrieved candidate while referring it as a secret document. There should be proper rechecking, not recounting, while showing the answer sheet to the candidate.


Respected sir, my request to you is that please bring reforms in the whole CSS procedure. Instead of targeting one or two papers to fail the candidates, all those who performed well in the examination should be passed in written part. Those who could not allocate in twelve prestigious groups of Central Superior Services should be adjusted in other 17 scale jobs. While doing so, there would be no need to advertise and conduct examinations for other 17 scale jobs. Mostly one paper MCQs tests are conducted for 17 scale jobs, other than CSS, in which the true abilities could not be judged properly. If those candidates will be allocated in 17 scale jobs who will pass 12 papers of 100 marks each, but would not be allocated in Superior Services, then the most competent youth will serve the country. As in Bangladesh there are cadre services and Non-cadre services. Who could not be allocated in cadre services are adjusted to 1st class Non-cadre posts.






Respectfully Sheweth,






Jamal Abdul Nasir

CNIC number:

Mobile number:

Phone number:

Address:
E-mail address:



.

__________________
مجھے ہے حکمِ اذاں

@jamalnasir.....

Present Fpsc chairman, Naveed Akram Cheema, is an honest and a candid person.


So please also send him the same stuff.

i hope he will really take some serious steps against the real culprits (like Nargis sethi) for such a disgusting and so discombobulating result.

__________________
"It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves."

Jamal and others

That's not good, you do not harken to my sincere advice. I had told you to work on your own flaws and become too best to be ignored by FPSC. This is sheer ignominy on your part that instead of raising yourself to these standards where you can ace the exam, you are asking FPSC to lower their standards. You are treading on wrong path and instigating others to do the same.

As a civil servant myself, I would never want the FPSC to lower their standards to that of Board exams where people are securing 99% marks, this is a competitive exam for God sake, they do not grade you for little thing you have put on the paper, rather they penalize you for the blunders you make. The examiners is tasked with failing all those who are not commensurate with the level of CSS.

I would reiterate my advice to all of you. Please do focus on your mistakes. Instead of asking the mountain top to come down to earth, climb the mountain and reach the top; former is impossible but later can be made possible with your hard work and commitment.

Due to some rubbish amendments in fpsc constitutional framework in previous years, now Chairman doesn't enjoys much authority like past.He has to c0-work & to share his core powers with those 10 members,who are directly appointed by P.M.

And unfortunately, Some members being raw operators, are trying their best to dismantle the core functions of fpsc.


But still we should be hopeful that .....chairman will take all possible & indispensable initiatives for the betterment of this prime institution.

__________________
"It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves."

i think .....you didn't read the following thread.

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-dates...countable.html

__________________
"It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves."

There is nothing in this thread except a snapshot of a Facebook post. Does it corroborate any accusation that you people are making?

sir, if you dont believe your senior then why should we believe your words?
The drastic fall in success ratio, failure of a thousand candidates in a row-all these reveal that we are given engineered result.

@all I am done with my attempts still I sent my petition just to ensure that the whole process is made transparent.
send as maximum petitions as you can so nobody dares to play with your aspirations. Otherwise you are liable to be bullied in 2017, 18 and so on.

__________________
winners never quit, and quitters never win.

Well replied.

&

bro, with my teary eyes, i salute you.......for voluntarily fighting this critical case of other fellows.


I'm sure..... Inshaallah, Allah almighty will bless you something much better than this service.


God bless.

__________________
"It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves."