Sunday, March 03, 2024
01:30 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2017 Exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 9
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Long Live Pakistan is on a distinguished road
Exclamation CE-2017 Allocation Query

CE-2017 ALLOCATION ISSUE

So I have been following different threads on various platforms about the allocations of CE-2017 candidates but still am unable to find any satisfactory justification.
The fact that the non-recommended candidates are not the ones with lower merits, rather appear randomly in the final result is difficult to understand

The people who are justifying by saying that it is because of Punjab quota being fulfilled. Please answer how Merit no.126, a Male Candidate from Punjab did not get allocated to any group, and another male candidate from Punjab bearing Merit no. 130 got allocated? There are various examples like this. and for every province.

Those who are saying that it may be because of character verification issues e.t.c. They are requested to read Note 3 (ii) at the end of the final result.
which means that even the recommended candidates have to go through character verification after this.

So is there any logical explanation regarding this issue?
That why around 50 candidates are not recommended for service regardless of seats being available. and why are they selected at random? What are the basis of them being not recommended?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
therevenant's Avatar
46th CTP (PAAS)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2017 - Merit 163
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: The Milky Way
Posts: 34
Thanks: 11
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
therevenant is on a distinguished road
Default

It is because they didnít give preference to all occupational groups.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
siddiquiali's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 290
Thanks: 67
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
siddiquiali is on a distinguished road
Default

There are special quotas for women, minorities, and disabled people. That is why some people with lower merit were allocated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advertisement No. 06 & 07 /2017 (Lecturers, Subject Specialists and TMO's) Asif Khan Shinwari KPK PSC Others Examinations 0 Saturday, August 12, 2017 02:31 PM
Various posts announced by kpk psc... nafees khattak KPKPMS 8 Thursday, July 13, 2017 08:07 PM
Advertisement No. 02/2017 Asif Khan Shinwari KPK PSC Others Examinations 3 Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:18 AM
KPK PSC Announced a Lot of jobs Qacc KPK PSC Others Examinations 13 Saturday, October 20, 2012 03:06 PM
KPK PSC: Adv. No.03 / 2011, Due Date: 23-07-2011 prestigious KPKPMS 4 Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:12 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.