Friday, April 19, 2024
03:01 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS News

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 51
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
hammadsindhu is on a distinguished road
Default No 16 year education on the cards, only screening test proposed!!

Pre-CSS exam screening test on cards

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) has decided to introduce a screening test for candidates appearing in the Central Superior Services (CSS) examination.

As per its earlier announcement, the screening test will be of three hours, based on multiple choice questions, and will carry 200 marks. It would comprise English vocabulary and grammar, general knowledge and Islamiat. Only candidates qualifying the test would be allowed to appear in the CSS exam.

“We are going to place this proposal before the cabinet meeting for a final approval,” Secretary Establishment Division Nadeem Hassan Asif told the Senate standing committee on cabinet secretariat on Monday.

He, however, did not clarify if the proposal was based on the 2013 announcement or there were some changes to the pattern of the screening test.

If approved, only candidates passing the screening test would be allowed to appear in CSS exam
He said the proposal had been presented to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who directed the authorities concerned to make it a part of the agenda item of the cabinet meeting.

“We are hopeful that the proposal will be approved in the cabinet meeting soon. I’m in touch with the secretary cabinet to include the proposal in the agenda of the meeting.”

Later, in reply to a question by Dawn about the Planning Commission’s reported proposal for making 16 years education mandatory for the CSS examination, Mr Arif said: “I think that proposal has not been presented at any forum so far and is not a part of this proposal which is going to be presented before the cabinet.”

In its annual report 2013, the FPSC stated that it had forwarded the screening test proposal to the federal government on June 28, 2013. However, so far the proposal could not get the government’s attention.

Briefing the standing committee, which met under the chairmanship of Senator Mohammad Talha Mehmood, Secretary FPSC Haseeb Athar and the secretary establishment said the commission had to do a lot of work for selecting the best candidates for the interview.

“We have to go through the papers of thousands of candidates. Roughly, out of 25,000 candidates only around 1,000 qualify for the interview,” said the secretary establishment.

Both the officers told the committee that if approved the screening test would help filter out only the potential candidates and reduce the workloads of the examiners.

The secretary FPSC also briefed the committee about steps being taken, or which are required to be taken, for further strengthening of the commission. He said the FPSC had planned to construct its own four examination centres.

The annual report 2013 had also stated that the number of applicants for the competitive examination was increasing.

“It has increased from 9,056 applicants in 2009 to 24,640 applicants in 2014, a growth of 172pc. The number of candidates actually appearing in the examination has increased from 5,707 in 2009 to 13,169 in 2014, a growth of 131pc.”

The report added that the increase was leading to the delay in the completion of the examination process, which was taking 18 months, compromising on the objectivity in assessing the question papers.

Daily-wager teachers
The standing committee also discussed the issue of daily-wage teachers, who have been staging sit-ins for the last 70 days for the regularisation of their services and payment of salaries. The FDE told the committee that the salaries of all the daily-wage employees had been released while the regularisation of their services was under the consideration of a committee headed by Secretary FPSC Haseeb Athar.

However, a representative of the daily-wage teachers challenged the stance of the FDE and said according to its terms and references, the committee was not mandated to take up their cases.

Additional secretary CADD Qaisar Majeed Malik assured the committee that his ministry would take steps to empower the committee to also hear the cases of daily-wage teaching and non-teaching staff.

Published in Dawn, January 26th, 2016

Source

Last edited by Man Jaanbazam; Friday, January 29, 2016 at 05:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to hammadsindhu For This Useful Post:
Antalpur (Friday, January 29, 2016), rabia butt (Monday, February 01, 2016)
  #2  
Old Tuesday, January 26, 2016
raufaccountax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lahore
Posts: 310
Thanks: 12
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
raufaccountax is on a distinguished road
Default

Final approval kb ho gi?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 51
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
hammadsindhu is on a distinguished road
Default

Please visit the link above. There's latest news that no proposal is under consideration for extending the education requirement to 16 years.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 95
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
hafsa ali asghar is on a distinguished road
Default

i read it then what does it mean no relexation /?/////

i think its means that fpsc has not forward proposal.

Last edited by Man Jaanbazam; Friday, January 29, 2016 at 05:29 AM. Reason: merge chain posts
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 51
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
hammadsindhu is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, going by the contents of the report, it appears that there is no such proposal as was rumored.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 95
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
hafsa ali asghar is on a distinguished road
Default

age relaxation is the proposal of planning commission and is not presented by fpsc. screening test is fpsc proposal. both are separate proposals.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Friday, January 29, 2016
MKamranKhanzada's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 50
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
MKamranKhanzada is on a distinguished road
Default

I sincerely hope for that.

Limiting the Education Limit to at least 16 year is a very demotivating maneuver regardless of what most of you might think otherwise.

There are many potential talented people (for various reasons) who hold 14 years Degree and they should not be deprived of their chance at CSS.

Last edited by Man Jaanbazam; Friday, January 29, 2016 at 05:29 AM. Reason: merge chain posts
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Friday, January 29, 2016
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Peshawar
Posts: 6
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
kalsooom is on a distinguished road
Default

why bureaucracy is always that slow? its been two years i am hearing this
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality of Education in Pakistan..... Mazher Discussion 9 Monday, April 11, 2022 12:09 PM
Essay:- Education in Pakistan tariqhussain Essays 17 Thursday, November 28, 2019 01:54 PM
Education System in Pakistan Amoeba Current Affairs Notes 2 Tuesday, December 18, 2018 02:32 PM
Mughal Empire 1526-1707 Bushra Sabeen History of Pakistan & India 1 Thursday, October 11, 2012 06:57 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.