Monday, April 06, 2020
01:28 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS News

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, November 25, 2016
Amna's Avatar
Super Moderator
Moderator: Ribbon awarded to moderators of the forum - Issue reason: Best Moderator Award: Awarded for censoring all swearing and keeping posts in order. - Issue reason: Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Desert of Dream
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,961 Times in 1,037 Posts
Amna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud ofAmna has much to be proud of
Default Discussing the 98 per cent failure in the CSS exams

Discussing the 98 per cent failure in the CSS exams


By Mohammad Ali Babakhel


It’s fine to celebrate success but it is more important to heed the lessons of failure – Bill Gates

The recent 98 per cent failure of the candidates in the written part of the competitive examination (CE) is deplorable — but is it the failure of the candidates or could it be attributed to other factors?

Does it depict flaws in our education system? Does it depict poor professional counselling of students? What about the role of the parents? Does it also demonstrate the flaws in the talent hunting apparatus? Also why does success in the CSS examination primarily dependent upon proficiency in the English language? Why are specific talent hunting programmes not tailored for professional groups like the Police service of Pakistan and Foreign Service of Pakistan? Are our universities imparting knowledge or merely awarding degrees? Why are universities failing to promote creativity? Despite the mushroom growth in the number of universities, the question arises as to what is the reason for such a dismal scenario? If universities churn out such talent how FPSC alone be held responsible for high percentage of failure?

According to the recent results, only 202 candidates qualified for the written part of the exam. 20717 candidates applied for the examination and only 9643 appeared. In CE 2013,15998 candidates applied, 11447 appeared and 238 were declared successful in the written test. For CE-2013 FPSC interviewed 238 candidates against 266 advertised vacancies and finally 194 candidates were allocated thus 72 vacancies remained vacant. For CE-2014, FPSC interviewed 377 candidates against 315 advertised vacancies but finally 233 candidates were allocated thus 82 vacancies remained unfilled. The remaining one-fourth of the vacancies unfilled in a country with one of the highest unemployment rate is a matter of grave concern. Such vacancies primarily remained unfilled owing to non-availability of suitable candidates from within the minority sector, smaller provinces and women.

During CE-2013, out of the total 72 unfilled slots, 25 were reserved for women, 25 for minorities and 22 open dependent on merit. Out of the total 25 unfilled women seats, 14 remained vacant in Sindh and out of total 25 seats for minorities, 12 remained vacant in Punjab. To make civil service more representative and service oriented, the FPSC needs to ensure inclusion of minorities and women as per available quota.

In CE-2013, 67 per cent of total allocated seats were captured by second and third time repeaters hence it transpires that after better preparation, change of subjects, guidance and improvement in presentation skills, they actually performed well. The performance of repeaters also suggests that the FPSC and universities should jointly design career counselling programmes.

In 2011, 13,071 candidates applied while 9,063 appeared; on the contrary, 24,640 candidates applied and 13,170 appeared in 2014. The final result in 2011 was 8.67 per cent while in 2014, the result was only 2.86 per cent. Though in three years time, the applicants were doubled but as compared with the results of 2011, 67 per cent downward result has been noticed in 2014.

For CE-2014, 24,640 aspirants applied but only 13,170 appeared thus it depicts that a majority of them were either not serious or they treated it as an examination of chance or luck. In the annual report of 2014, the FPSC identified the lack of analytical skills, critical approach, inability to comprehend issues, non-familiarity with subjects and poor presentation based on illogical arguments with wrong or irrelevant data as few reasons of failures.

Though universities are the best places to prepare young graduates for competitive examinations but in recent rankings, only three universities made place in the top 800 universities. Majority of the graduates are dependent upon the reproduction of information and get degrees. The aspirants shall realise, in time, that the CSS is not an academic examination but rather a competitive examination that requires quality, quantity and problem-solving approaches.

Still though, the CSS examination is the only talent assessment process that enjoys unimpeachable credibility, hence the FPSC should not act purely as a bureaucratic organisation but an adaptable modern talent hunting body. Ideally, the FPSC should establish an institutional network with leading universities, ministries and departments for whom it hunts the talent.

The recent introduction of subjects like Governance and Public Policy, Town Planning and Urban Development, Gender Studies, Environmental Science, Criminology and Anthropology is a positive measure that will improve the quality of intake. Research wing of FPSC should opt for a more diagnostic approach and also focus on studying the global practices.

We as Pakistani citizens need to encourage a debate as to why a candidate who opted for general subjects like language, history and sociology may land in the Pakistan Administrative Service or the Police but a candidate opting for international relations, US history, public administration, criminology and international law either fails or may be placed in information group.

Though in CE-2014, 53 per cent candidates opted for Journalism as an optional subject the results were disappointing. The Annual Report (AR) of FPSC 2014 observed that the “performance of the majority of the candidates was poor.” During 2014, 40 per cent candidates opted for Sociology. Though Sociology remained the second most popular optional subject but regarding the performance of candidates, the AR 2014 expressed “It seemed that candidates run after guides etc. or to shortcuts available in the markets.” In “Everyday Science about half of the candidates did not secure even 30 per cent marks. Regarding poor performance in Pakistan Affairs, the report observed that “Only five per cent candidates attempted seriously.”

Though after the 18th amendment, the quality of education in the smaller province was expected to soar, statistical data of results speaks otherwise. Domicile-wise performance shows that among the top 100 positions, candidates from Punjab got 77, K-P 7 and Sindh also got 7 positions. In such ranking, candidates from AJK obtained 2 seats, Fata obtained 2 and Balochistan obtained 5. Such poor performance should be a guiding principle for the bureaucracy of smaller provinces to devise improved strategies for educational development and prepare the youth for competitive examination and challenges being confronted.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 25th, 2016.
__________________
To succeed,look at things not as they are,but as they can be.:)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Amna For This Useful Post:
muhammadsaadvirk (Thursday, January 25, 2018)
  #2  
Old Thursday, January 25, 2018
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere on the earth
Posts: 22
Thanks: 74
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
muhammadsaadvirk is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amna View Post
Discussing the 98 per cent failure in the CSS exams


By Mohammad Ali Babakhel


It’s fine to celebrate success but it is more important to heed the lessons of failure – Bill Gates

The recent 98 per cent failure of the candidates in the written part of the competitive examination (CE) is deplorable — but is it the failure of the candidates or could it be attributed to other factors?

Does it depict flaws in our education system? Does it depict poor professional counselling of students? What about the role of the parents? Does it also demonstrate the flaws in the talent hunting apparatus? Also why does success in the CSS examination primarily dependent upon proficiency in the English language? Why are specific talent hunting programmes not tailored for professional groups like the Police service of Pakistan and Foreign Service of Pakistan? Are our universities imparting knowledge or merely awarding degrees? Why are universities failing to promote creativity? Despite the mushroom growth in the number of universities, the question arises as to what is the reason for such a dismal scenario? If universities churn out such talent how FPSC alone be held responsible for high percentage of failure?

According to the recent results, only 202 candidates qualified for the written part of the exam. 20717 candidates applied for the examination and only 9643 appeared. In CE 2013,15998 candidates applied, 11447 appeared and 238 were declared successful in the written test. For CE-2013 FPSC interviewed 238 candidates against 266 advertised vacancies and finally 194 candidates were allocated thus 72 vacancies remained vacant. For CE-2014, FPSC interviewed 377 candidates against 315 advertised vacancies but finally 233 candidates were allocated thus 82 vacancies remained unfilled. The remaining one-fourth of the vacancies unfilled in a country with one of the highest unemployment rate is a matter of grave concern. Such vacancies primarily remained unfilled owing to non-availability of suitable candidates from within the minority sector, smaller provinces and women.

During CE-2013, out of the total 72 unfilled slots, 25 were reserved for women, 25 for minorities and 22 open dependent on merit. Out of the total 25 unfilled women seats, 14 remained vacant in Sindh and out of total 25 seats for minorities, 12 remained vacant in Punjab. To make civil service more representative and service oriented, the FPSC needs to ensure inclusion of minorities and women as per available quota.

In CE-2013, 67 per cent of total allocated seats were captured by second and third time repeaters hence it transpires that after better preparation, change of subjects, guidance and improvement in presentation skills, they actually performed well. The performance of repeaters also suggests that the FPSC and universities should jointly design career counselling programmes.

In 2011, 13,071 candidates applied while 9,063 appeared; on the contrary, 24,640 candidates applied and 13,170 appeared in 2014. The final result in 2011 was 8.67 per cent while in 2014, the result was only 2.86 per cent. Though in three years time, the applicants were doubled but as compared with the results of 2011, 67 per cent downward result has been noticed in 2014.

For CE-2014, 24,640 aspirants applied but only 13,170 appeared thus it depicts that a majority of them were either not serious or they treated it as an examination of chance or luck. In the annual report of 2014, the FPSC identified the lack of analytical skills, critical approach, inability to comprehend issues, non-familiarity with subjects and poor presentation based on illogical arguments with wrong or irrelevant data as few reasons of failures.

Though universities are the best places to prepare young graduates for competitive examinations but in recent rankings, only three universities made place in the top 800 universities. Majority of the graduates are dependent upon the reproduction of information and get degrees. The aspirants shall realise, in time, that the CSS is not an academic examination but rather a competitive examination that requires quality, quantity and problem-solving approaches.

Still though, the CSS examination is the only talent assessment process that enjoys unimpeachable credibility, hence the FPSC should not act purely as a bureaucratic organisation but an adaptable modern talent hunting body. Ideally, the FPSC should establish an institutional network with leading universities, ministries and departments for whom it hunts the talent.

The recent introduction of subjects like Governance and Public Policy, Town Planning and Urban Development, Gender Studies, Environmental Science, Criminology and Anthropology is a positive measure that will improve the quality of intake. Research wing of FPSC should opt for a more diagnostic approach and also focus on studying the global practices.

We as Pakistani citizens need to encourage a debate as to why a candidate who opted for general subjects like language, history and sociology may land in the Pakistan Administrative Service or the Police but a candidate opting for international relations, US history, public administration, criminology and international law either fails or may be placed in information group.

Though in CE-2014, 53 per cent candidates opted for Journalism as an optional subject the results were disappointing. The Annual Report (AR) of FPSC 2014 observed that the “performance of the majority of the candidates was poor.” During 2014, 40 per cent candidates opted for Sociology. Though Sociology remained the second most popular optional subject but regarding the performance of candidates, the AR 2014 expressed “It seemed that candidates run after guides etc. or to shortcuts available in the markets.” In “Everyday Science about half of the candidates did not secure even 30 per cent marks. Regarding poor performance in Pakistan Affairs, the report observed that “Only five per cent candidates attempted seriously.”

Though after the 18th amendment, the quality of education in the smaller province was expected to soar, statistical data of results speaks otherwise. Domicile-wise performance shows that among the top 100 positions, candidates from Punjab got 77, K-P 7 and Sindh also got 7 positions. In such ranking, candidates from AJK obtained 2 seats, Fata obtained 2 and Balochistan obtained 5. Such poor performance should be a guiding principle for the bureaucracy of smaller provinces to devise improved strategies for educational development and prepare the youth for competitive examination and challenges being confronted.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 25th, 2016.
Well this is well phrased article on the failure of our Universities.

Nowadays, in universities teachers are promoting the cramming system on the other hand the talent of the students is just wasting. And the other problem is that the thinking of parents not yet changed, they want their children to be a doctor or engineer. And in universities, once a student enters he became a cramming machine who just remembers the books but don't try to understand what is written in the book.

The other problem is counseling, neither the teacher guides a students nor the institute nor the family. Therefore, the mass students fails in CSS Exams.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Business and Economic Affairs Kaleem ullah shah News & Articles 167 Tuesday, October 29, 2019 09:11 AM
The News: Political Economy: Opinion & Analysis redmax News & Articles 413 Tuesday, February 11, 2014 02:40 PM
World Economies xavier News & Articles 0 Thursday, March 25, 2010 03:33 PM
Problems of Pakistan and their solution Mazher Essays 10 Wednesday, November 14, 2007 11:29 PM
""face The Nation"chief Executive’s Talk free thinker Pakistan Affairs 0 Monday, May 01, 2006 06:29 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.