Friday, March 29, 2024
05:19 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group I > Economics

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 11
Thanks: 4
Thanked 27 Times in 4 Posts
Tutankhamen is on a distinguished road
Default Help needed in structuring answers

Respected Seniors,

I need some assistance regarding the structure of answers for Economics. I have consulted various books and their level of difficulty and detail varies so much that I am unsure about what level of detail and analysis do the exam questions command. If anyone can be kind enough to give a general outline with an example, and if possible, your contact email/number so I could ask specific questions.

Your help is much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Wednesday, December 30, 2009
xenia's Avatar
39th CTP (DMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 - Merit 79
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: lhr
Posts: 108
Thanks: 123
Thanked 134 Times in 79 Posts
xenia is on a distinguished road
Default economics question

i think paper 2 requires more analysis, i mean the more points u add the better it is.for paper 1 it is said that a BA level answer is fine but since past papers have really heterogeneous question i reallt doubt this presumption..so these days i m also exploring different references for various topics.for instance last year paper had a question about keynesian consumption function..now for 20 marks i think a simple answer isnt enough.u can star with 2 sector model n xplain C func n then in three sector model..i mean adding govt sector. then u can go ahead n compare it with classical C func n may give some example of the function.
as regards the detailed discussions its better to do it on forum as u may get opinion of more than 1 person.
hope that helps..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 11
Thanks: 4
Thanked 27 Times in 4 Posts
Tutankhamen is on a distinguished road
Default

@Xenia:
Many thanks for your reply. Your Keynesian answer structure is very helpful, but what about more straight forward questions, but also very open in their scope. For instance,
Q5. Why we demand for money? Explain each one of them. (2009)
Q.4 Explain the quantity Theory of Money with suitable examples. (2007)
These are both very simple questions, but for 20 marks I would think we need more than just the basics. For the demand for money let's say we follow the following outline
i. Define money (precise functions, uses etc- just basic)
ii. State, explain, give examples and illustrate diagrammatically the three kinds of demand for money
iii. Analyse how that leads to the liquidity preference theory and the interest rate determination.
iv. Evaluation/conclusion
I wonder if that is sufficient or do we need to go in detail about how that is then used to derive LM for IS-LM, or QTM, or refer to determinants of Money Supply or its use in monetary policy etc? I could think of a lot of relevant material to put in but I guess it would be wise to know how much analysis do these questions demand?
Your feedback will be much appreciated
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Thursday, December 31, 2009
xenia's Avatar
39th CTP (DMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 - Merit 79
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: lhr
Posts: 108
Thanks: 123
Thanked 134 Times in 79 Posts
xenia is on a distinguished road
Default money demand n QTM

regarding money demand question i would proceed as follows:
defining money n then its uses(medium of xchange, store of value...)
then classical view about money demand followed by keynesian view n then a general analysis...i dont think there is a need to go as far as ISLM analysis.basically we are supposed to explain the 3 motives of keynes so focuss on them(u can refer froyen)
QTM is alreay a lengthy question!here in example i think we need to put numerical values in QTM equation n exemplify the relationship of M n P.if u do this for all versions the question is already enough..n also put examples from real life like german hyper inflation/ in USSR n if u can add something from pakistans economic history..hope u get something from it!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xenia For This Useful Post:
Tutankhamen (Thursday, December 31, 2009)
  #5  
Old Thursday, December 31, 2009
abbasi_faheem's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 53
Thanks: 29
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
abbasi_faheem is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutankhamen View Post
Respected Seniors,

I need some assistance regarding the structure of answers for Economics. I have consulted various books and their level of difficulty and detail varies so much that I am unsure about what level of detail and analysis do the exam questions command. If anyone can be kind enough to give a general outline with an example, and if possible, your contact email/number so I could ask specific questions.

Your help is much appreciated.
@Tutankhamen

Dear I am M.A (Economics), but still not taking Economics as my optional for CSS because of its lengthy paper pattern. However I would like to share here my M.A (Economics) Experiences, well I think that most of our economic theory has Graphical representation thus I suggest following pattern.

Introduction: Under this heading give a brief introduction of the topic u r attempting.
Definition: Provides as many definition as u know including the reference(source)
Explanation: Draw a graph at the right most side of the page and then start explaining ur answer with the help of that graph...and yes don't forget to give a reference number to the graph i.e. G-1a,G-1b... for Question # 1's answer and G-2a, G-2b...for Question # 2's answer respectively.
Conclusion: Here give a brief conclusion regarding ur attemt...
__________________
Anyone can be angry; it is very easy, but to be angry with the right person, at the right time, for the right reason, to the right degree; it is not easy.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to abbasi_faheem For This Useful Post:
Tutankhamen (Thursday, December 31, 2009)
  #6  
Old Thursday, December 31, 2009
Zahid Morio's Avatar
38th CTP (ITG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 185
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Larkana
Posts: 33
Thanks: 31
Thanked 55 Times in 14 Posts
Zahid Morio is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi,
I had opted economicsas an optional subject. I would like to share my experiences regarding your query.
It is a common perception that economics paper in CSS is the same as one has learned in his or her graduation/ masters levels.
Actually economics is like any other optional subjets and it must be treated as such.
Questions that appear in paper usually contain multiple queries which need to be answered as you can see in the examples quoted by you.
What you have to ensure is that:
1. Your answers must answer all queries in the question
2. Every question should b answered by dividing the answer into headings and sub-headings.
3. Keep your answers as simple as possible; i.e. avoid complicated mathematical equations. However graphs and equations should be given where it is necessary.
__________________
Zahid Morio

Last edited by Andrew Dufresne; Thursday, December 31, 2009 at 05:26 PM. Reason: Kindly, share email addresses through your profile only.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zahid Morio For This Useful Post:
Tutankhamen (Thursday, December 31, 2009)
  #7  
Old Thursday, December 31, 2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 11
Thanks: 4
Thanked 27 Times in 4 Posts
Tutankhamen is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you all for your kind suggestions. From your feedback, I gather that the level of difficulty and detail is not too high. I have grasped the general idea given the basic outlines. If I may ask another question, which I hope will benefit other aspirants as well.

Q6. High tax means large disincentives to productive efforts, that aggregate supply and tax revenues are both restricted. Give your argument for a just tax system. (2006)

Other than the basic types, characteristics, and purpose of a sound tax system, if one was to analyse the statement in the question, I wonder if the following analysis is sound?
i) High tax --> Disposable income falls --> AD shifts down--> lowering both the price level and the National income (Y) leading to a deflationary gap (start at full employment)
ii) Higher tax rate means higher tax revenue, which could finance higher government spending, assuming the increased Gs completely off-sets fall in AD and shifts the AS curve rightwards- it will eliminate the deflationary gap, decrease the price level but increase the National income.
iii) Given a developing economy like Pakistan, the govt is most likely to tax consumption rather than saving, which by implication means a fall in the i.r (can be shown through IS-LM or Liquidity preference,) which could in turn induce higher investment in later years.

I want to know if this analysis is correct, and secondly, given enough time, if it would be relevant in questions pertaining tax implications (and their variants).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Friday, January 01, 2010
xenia's Avatar
39th CTP (DMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 - Merit 79
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: lhr
Posts: 108
Thanks: 123
Thanked 134 Times in 79 Posts
xenia is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutankhamen View Post
Q6. High tax means large disincentives to productive efforts, that aggregate supply and tax revenues are both restricted. Give your argument for a just tax system. (2006)


i) High tax --> Disposable income falls --> AD shifts down--> lowering both the price level and the National income (Y) leading to a deflationary gap (start at full employment)
ii) Higher tax rate means higher tax revenue, which could finance higher government spending, assuming the increased Gs completely off-sets fall in AD and shifts the AS curve rightwards- it will eliminate the deflationary gap, decrease the price level but increase the National income.
iii) Given a developing economy like Pakistan, the govt is most likely to tax consumption rather than saving, which by implication means a fall in the i.r (can be shown through IS-LM or Liquidity preference,) which could in turn induce higher investment in later years.
i think (although i may b wrong according to others) the reasoning we are supposed to give is already there in the ques.ur reasoning n logic arent wrong but they may not apply here.
"High tax means large disincentives to productive efforts,"here its presumed that the tax is being applied on savings n consequently inv. so ur 3rd point is not relevant here+the question isnt particularly about pakistan.

"that aggregate supply and tax revenues are both restricted."again its presumed that tax revenues arent much so no need to add the 2nd point.
now as far as ur 1st point is concerned, the question isnt addressing inflation explicitly+fall in AD doesnt necessarily lead to delationary gap n dont u think the question is focussing the supply side..
i think ur answer should directly focuss the ques. so if we proceed like this.
large tax means lower savings n disincentives for investment..this will affect the supply side of the economy..AS will lower n since economic activity will reduce, we assume that tax revenues would b lower.then give ur arguments about an ideal tax system(having a broad base, lesser burden on poor..here u may giv pros n cons of various types of taxes to make arguments+add examples to verify ur arguments) n i dont think the types of taxes n their characteristics should b written straight away..it gives the impression tha u r just reproducin the crammed stuff .. n this question is essentially theoretical n natrure..
so what do u say?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Friday, January 01, 2010
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 407
Thanks: 193
Thanked 301 Times in 183 Posts
New Student has a spectacular aura aboutNew Student has a spectacular aura about
Default

@Tutankhamen

Let me give my explanation:

1. Your first explanation is the main argument of Supply Siders against hike in tax rate. They think that lower tax rate will increase the incentive to work, thereby increasing aggregate supply. However empirical results are mixed on relative success or failure of this argument. However your logic is very right, although Neo Classicals may differ. Regarding your answer about just tax system, then it is usually thought in economics that direct taxes are more equitable than indirect ones, however regarding efficieny indirect taxes are more efficient. There is much debate on equity vs efficiency. Since you are answering a subjective idea "just tax system", then in my thinking equity is the main principle you would prefer. So imposition of direct taxes is more likely to be just, although debatable.

2. Your second argument is flawed. Even if we assume that increased tax revenue is reinjected in the economy through government spending, then how it is going to change aggregate supply the way you are saying?

I agree to Xenia, that question is not about Pakistan, so avoid it.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Friday, January 01, 2010
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 11
Thanks: 4
Thanked 27 Times in 4 Posts
Tutankhamen is on a distinguished road
Default

@Xenia
I was treating the statement as a discuss statement, not an assertion to take as given. Because implementation of a high tax which hinders productive capacity, impedes growth and restricts tax revenue is rather an unlikely tax policy. But even if we take the statement as given and assume that the tax is high, the first and most potent consequence would be a fall in disposable income and investment, which shifts the AD curve to the left. The only way a higher tax could shift the AS is through a fall in prdouctivity, and/or rising wages or costs of production. In that case, both the AD and the AS will shift to the left, with the new equilibrium at the same price level (if both the AD and AS move to offset/or proportionally) but at a lower level of national income. How can one link this to a just tax system?

@newstudent
Thankyou for your feedback, it is very helpful. I do think that this question is mostly theoretical and I have a feeling that makes it relatively low scoring. What would you suggest regarding such theoretical questions? Like this question is a typical out of textbook debate on merits vs demerits of direct and indirect taxation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solved Everyday Science Papers Dilrauf General Science & Ability 4 Friday, April 08, 2011 06:10 PM
Call for help New Student Economics 4 Saturday, May 09, 2009 11:30 AM
What Is So Inspiring In Css??? Answers Needed F.S. CSS Competitive Examination 31 Monday, February 16, 2009 09:17 PM
Observations on performance of candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2005 Aarwaa Subject Analysis 4 Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:21 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.