Wednesday, April 24, 2024
07:38 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group I > International Relations

International Relations Notes on IR

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, July 31, 2016
Malik Safdar Abbas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Karachi Pakistan
Posts: 214
Thanks: 34
Thanked 100 Times in 60 Posts
Malik Safdar Abbas is on a distinguished road
Default classical realism vs neo-realism

Can one differentiate classical realism with neo-realism. And is scientific approach also called behaviouralism ?
__________________
Iyyaka Na'bodo wa,Iyyaka Nasta'een
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Thursday, August 04, 2016
Nazish Hina's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Searching...
Posts: 696
Thanks: 248
Thanked 449 Times in 287 Posts
Nazish Hina is on a distinguished road
Default

Difference between Realism (Classical Realism) Neo Realism (Structural) Realism

Classical realism refers to writings by Thucydides, Machieavelli, Carl von Clausewitz and Hans J. Morgenthau - they are concerned with order, justice and change at the domestic and international level and their analysis is similar for both - they stress similarities, not differences, between domestic and international politics, and the role of ethics and community in promoting stability. They tend to have a “tragic” outlook - that history repeats itself, and that hubris leads to war… in their view, communal bonds are fragile and easily undermined by those seeking unilateral advantage by either individuals or states.

A key difference between classical realists and structural realists lies in the motivation to power. The two schools view that question differently. Classical realists say that the will to power is linked to human nature, and that’s why their analysis of individuals and states is similar. Everyone is born with a will to power hardwired into their brain, and therefore nothing can really be done to improve that situation, for which reason war seems inevitable. There will always appear some asshole who wants to dominate others.

For structural realists, human nature has little to do with why states want power. Rather, the architecture of the international system forces states to pursue power… it is simply rational for every state to acquire sufficient power to defend itself in the event that it is attacked. In such a system, states are forced to compete if they wish to survive. Structural realists ignore cultural differences among states and regime type because the international system creates the same incentives for all great powers. For structuralists, unlike for classical realists, who is in power is not that important, so classical realists put more emphasis on human actors/human agency.

Another question shows the differences between the two: How much power is enough? Defensive realists (also structuralists) like Kenneth Waltz say it is unwise for states to acquire too much power because the system will punish them. Offensive realists like John Mearsheimer argue that it makes strategic sense for states to acquire as much power as possible, and even to pursue hegemony.

For classical realists, power is an end in itself, a function of human nature, but for structural realists, power is a means to an end, and the ultimate end is survival.

And no the behaviouralism is behavioural approach and not scientific approach.
__________________
♥ Alis volat propriis ♥
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nazish Hina For This Useful Post:
Malik Safdar Abbas (Thursday, August 04, 2016)
  #3  
Old Thursday, August 04, 2016
Malik Safdar Abbas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Karachi Pakistan
Posts: 214
Thanks: 34
Thanked 100 Times in 60 Posts
Malik Safdar Abbas is on a distinguished road
Default

Simple and understandable explanation of the topics. Thank you Nazish Hina for your response
__________________
Iyyaka Na'bodo wa,Iyyaka Nasta'een
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Thursday, August 04, 2016
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: lahore
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
usama6 is on a distinguished road
Default Behavioral Approaches

Behavioural/Scientific Approaches of International Politics
Behavioural approaches to study of IR are often claimed by their western adherents to be scientific because they are based on quantitative calculations. They made us aware of the complex nature of conflicts and provided many valuable insights into decision r making. The ultimate objective of the behaviouralist scholars is to develop a general theory of international relations. The traditional approach was rooted largely in Political Science and drew heavily from Law, History and Philosophy. With the help of the behavioural approach, a discipline of international relations is at last beginning to emerge which is devoted to behavioural studies in IR.
There are several theories which may be lumped together under scientific/behavioural approach. Some like Systems Theory are more comprehensive than others like Bargaining and Game Theories. We will in this section briefly deal with only two of these behavioural scientific theories viz., the System Theory and the Game Theory.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Thursday, August 04, 2016
Malik Safdar Abbas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Karachi Pakistan
Posts: 214
Thanks: 34
Thanked 100 Times in 60 Posts
Malik Safdar Abbas is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usama6 View Post
Behavioural/Scientific Approaches of International Politics
Behavioural approaches to study of IR are often claimed by their western adherents to be scientific because they are based on quantitative calculations. They made us aware of the complex nature of conflicts and provided many valuable insights into decision r making. The ultimate objective of the behaviouralist scholars is to develop a general theory of international relations. The traditional approach was rooted largely in Political Science and drew heavily from Law, History and Philosophy. With the help of the behavioural approach, a discipline of international relations is at last beginning to emerge which is devoted to behavioural studies in IR.
There are several theories which may be lumped together under scientific/behavioural approach. Some like Systems Theory are more comprehensive than others like Bargaining and Game Theories. We will in this section briefly deal with only two of these behavioural scientific theories viz., the System Theory and the Game Theory.
Well you should have omitted the last line
By the way I was reading Parkash Chandar's book in which he names scientific approach as behavioral approach. It popularized during 2nd world war and lays more emphasis on the method of study rather than the subject matter and this is why it is called scientific.
__________________
Iyyaka Na'bodo wa,Iyyaka Nasta'een
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
some theories of international relations sayed khan International Relations 0 Sunday, December 02, 2007 09:53 PM
The Globalization of World Politics: Revision guide 3eBaylis & Smith: hellowahab International Relations 0 Wednesday, October 17, 2007 03:13 PM
Neo-Realism & Classical realism KHAN AMMAR ALI KHAN International Relations 0 Saturday, April 14, 2007 04:34 PM
Realism in international relations Qurratulain International Relations 1 Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:41 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.