Thursday, April 25, 2024
05:56 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group I > Political Science

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Monday, August 26, 2019
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
asadraza786 is on a distinguished road
Default Query regarding philosophers of Western Political thought

I am preparing western political thought. coming from a science background, it seems difficult to grasp the concept of it. I was wandering if anyone could tell me only the imp philosophers - not only philosophers but also their theories too- e.g my book has almost 6-7 theories of plato and 7-8 of Aristotle. And we all know that these philosophers are very imp. Do we need to prepare all the theories? or some can be left?
please help
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Monday, August 26, 2019
ahmedkamal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Karachi
Posts: 201
Thanks: 173
Thanked 74 Times in 60 Posts
ahmedkamal is on a distinguished road
Post Answer

Dear Friend,
Philosophers are integral part of political science paper 1 and part 1. It would be disastrous if you do not understand philosophies properly. First , every candidate have to develop imagination to understand philosophies and after development of imagination, story telling is second step. Learn philosophy like story. Let's understand theory of Hobbes, and Locke state of nature. Both philosopher pondered on question," how was state develop? " Imagine a jungle where all human being used to live. There were very limited resources. One day one person got a lot of meat and other foods, other people came to him and desired to rob meat from him. Fighting between those people were started and they beat each other. To solved a fight between individuals, God sent king and king created a state. State had been created by divine order. From above example, inference of state of nature of Hobbes was very cruel and human beings were involved in fighting each other.Come to John Locke. John Locke state of nature is different and creation of state is also different from Thomas Hobbes. In John Locke state of nature, Human lived in any place very peacefully and social. They respected each other and loved each other. One day, one one said, " this is my land, on one has right to come, live and work here, and stay out of here" and other man also done same thing that was occupation of territory. Individual owned private property and there was no right of other on one's individual property. One day, a goat of one person entered into fields of other person and ate some grass or fruits. Owner were informed and he came out with naked sword and want to kill goat and owner of goat. From this incident,fighting was started. Fighting was started because of private property. Thousand of tribal man were died, killed, injured and buried in this fighting. People recognized that there was great loss of life and property and we had to solve this problem. So they all were consented to create a body through which they would solved their problems and this body was recognized as government and state came into being through consent of people to created state because people pledge to government for solution of their problems.

So imagine and tell or write a stories to understand philosophies and do not forget that essay also needs story telling and imagination. These theories would also help you in essay.
__________________
“Never leave that till tomorrow which you can do today.”
Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
splendid is on a distinguished road
Post western philosophers

which source are u following
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Saturday, September 28, 2019
Dr Ashfaque's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 13
Thanks: 15
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Dr Ashfaque is on a distinguished road
Default

Consult past papers and prepare them accordingly . Judd Harmon is more than sufficient for philosophers portion so stick with this one book ..


Sent from my SM-C5000 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new PMS syllabus for new pattern ishti ahmad PCS / PMS 10 Sunday, January 12, 2020 09:29 PM
Ecnomic progress Vs Political situation very special 1 Discussion 48 Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:27 PM
Overview of Political Science khuhro Political Science 0 Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:48 PM
The Clash of Civilizations? zohaib Essays 0 Sunday, June 19, 2005 01:07 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.