Friday, March 29, 2024
02:33 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group I > Political Science

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, May 03, 2020
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 84
Thanks: 13
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
LifeAdventure is on a distinguished road
Default State of Nature Difference

What is the difference between the state of nature of Locke and Rousseau?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Monday, May 04, 2020
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 31
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Uswa Zainab is on a distinguished road
Default Major difference between Locke and Rousseau's account of the state of nature.

The major difference between Locke and Rousseau's account of the state of nature is the reason for using it as a literary device.

For Locke, the state of nature has the capacity to become a state of war but it can also be a place of increased liberty for the individual. Locke was examining the reason for moving out of the state of nature and the creation of sovereign authority. He argued that the need to protect private property and create security, inspired people to sacrifice some of their liberty to create an original (or social) contract and place themselves under the sovereignty of a ruler. Importantly, in Locke's opinion the consent for this authority - or transaction of power - can be withdrawn if the monarch/ ruler acts in a tyrannical manner. This is because they would be placing people in a state of war and thereby forfeiting their authority. This argument was developed in relation to the absolutist ambitions of Charles II and James II, and had influence on the American Revolution.

For Rousseau, the state of nature enables him to examine human nature in its primitive condition. He undertakes this to attack the reductionist ideas of Hobbes and Mandeville, who strip man of God and claim that humans are animalistic and violent. According to Rousseau this is incorrect, as he believes that people have inherent (natural) virtue. Moreover, people live in accordance with nature, freely interacting and living together. He argues that private property is the beginning of humanity's ills, and creates arrogance and competition not present in the early state of nature. Such arrogance drives humanity to desire greater property while losing their national compassion. The only way to restrain this behaviour is to create a civil authority that restrains the negative behaviour people now engage in.

So while Locke would argue that people can behave badly, he is less interested in human nature and more concerned with the location of sovereign authority and consent, and how it is exercised. Rousseau is examining the problems in the human condition due to interaction, and how this created the inequality and aggression that caused the development of civil society - something he laments (which Locke does not).

I haven't written this, actually I have copied this article from a website. To me, it is a good answer to this question. I hope it helps.

Last edited by Uswa Zainab; Monday, May 04, 2020 at 02:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Uswa Zainab For This Useful Post:
LifeAdventure (Monday, May 04, 2020)
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jammu And Kashmir Dispute Gul-e-Lala International Relations 1 Monday, September 02, 2019 04:02 PM
International Law(ASP Kamran Adil) Argus International Law 69 Monday, February 19, 2018 07:50 PM
Quick Notes of IR here imabdulkhaliq International Relations 12 Sunday, May 07, 2017 11:06 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.