Monday, September 16, 2019
07:52 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group II > Chemistry

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, March 17, 2013
Chintoo2010's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 301
Thanks: 93
Thanked 269 Times in 130 Posts
Chintoo2010 will become famous soon enough
Arrow Pros and Cons of Opting Chemistry-CSS

AOA
All the forum members aspirants

I appeared twice with Chemistry in CE-12 and CE-13.
The lesson learned by me in the process is shared below:-

I opted chemistry because:-

I am M.Sc Chemistry and very good at it.

I thought it would save my time in preparation.

Chemistry is a science and science subjects ensure full marks for the correct answers.

Being M.Sc, it will very little effort and time to prepare.

It would give me an edge and a jumping point to CSS.

Preparing any other subject would be hectic.

I am a science student and opting humanities and arts subjects sucks and too difficult to grasp them, so better to stick with chemistry ; which would serve for 200 marks in CSS. So the slog is ON.


What happens in preparing Chemistry for CSS?

Paper - I
Atomic Structure
(too hectic to prepare for most MSc Chemistry people except those of Physical).
There is still only a chance that a question might come from it or not. You can see the paper. (After 2010, it could find place in Paper in 2013 only).

Thermo and Electro (They must be prepared well. Thermo ensures you marks in Paper-I).

Industrial Chemistry and Metallurgy (The examiner can include it in paper at his will. Last year full question from Metallurgy and this year nothing). But you have to prepare it.

Transition Elements . It is the foremost part of Paper-I. You have to do it very well. To have a grasp at CFT and MOT etc, you will have to prepare MOT, VBT, Hybridization which will prepare the First Chapter or part of Paper-II (Bonding ). So never skip it.

Paper-II

Bonding
As I mentioned above, prepare Bonding before going to prepare Transition Elements in Paper-I. Its a must part.

Chemical Kinetics
Surface Chemistry and Catalysis

These are tricky portions. Questions from these portions are not easy to attempt.

Physical Organic Chemistry
Organic Halogen Compounds
Chemistry of Carbonyl Compounds
Aromatic Chemistry
Organic Nitrogen Compounds


This is the main portion of Paper-II; which you are studying from College times and most students are well aware of it and this portion makes 3 questions easily. And there would be no one opting chemistry who does not prepare bonding so under the ideal situation Paper-II should be attempted with bonding + Physical Organic Chemistry + Organic Halogen Compounds + Chemistry of Carbonyl Compounds + Aromatic Chemistry.

So to conclude:-
Paper - I should be attempted with

Thermodynamics - 1 Q
Chemistry of Transition Elements - 1 Q
Electrochemistry - 1 Q
Metallurgy +/ Industry - 1 Q or 1.5 Q
Atomic Structure -1 Q (if the examiner touches it)

and for Paper - II

Bonding - 1 Q

and 3-Questions from

Physical Organic Chemistry
Organic Halogen Compounds
Chemistry of Carbonyl Compounds
Aromatic Chemistry
Organic Nitrogen Compounds

But what is happening

Actually, the FPSC has bigger plans than the aspirants. They have started mixing the things and hence have shattered the dreams of the people who are opting chemistry.

They are not letting you get away with it so easily.
This year (2013) what happened is as under :-

Paper - II


Nomenclature 25 Marks 31% of the paper
General Chemistry 6 Marks (Reaction Types)

Portion wise

Theory of Chemical Bonding 10 Marks (It had a major role earlier)

Kinetics 10 Marks

Carbonyls 14 Marks (Conversions from Alkynes, FC etc)

Natural Products 20

Industrial Org Chem 20

Unexpectedly, Colloids have been asked in Paper-II. Luminescence, Colloids have been asked which is a bit over-stepping from course as the course is already too lengthy.

No question form Organic Halogens, Aromatics,Nitrogen Compounds. Also Main portions of big chapters of course which eat alots of time of the students to prepare have been altogether missed or given very few percentage.


The paper setter made it look like M/Phil Paper. Even M.Phil Organic Chemistry Student cannot prepare so much for one paper.



Similarly in Paper - I

They mixed Questions such that you cannot leave anything on choice.

Atomic Structure (Schrodinger wave equation) mixed with Acid rain and Global Warming on Plants,

Electro Chemistry with De-Broglie (if u have done electro and left atomic; then you would scratch head)

Similarly

Transition Elements; which is itself too lengthy and conceptual, did not suffice for the examiner to be included in paper as a full 20 marks question and he mixed Werner Theory (8 marks) with Chlorine (8 marks) and 4 marks about ozone layer.
However, in another question, he gives 14 marks to transition elements but adds a 6 marks portion of Cement.

Also, he gave Thermo in parts and mixed it badly with other things; you can see the paper.


So to conclude he just played a game of mixing up the things and made a pudding of whole syllabus. Somewhere he overstepped the course.


So Chemistry Course is itself too lengthy but to the surprise of aspirants, FPSC is still not happy and making it more and more unattractive for us. Paper seems to milk away the marks from us. Its more like game and less like a fair paper.

Important point

We should keep in mind that such a lengthy course of chemistry can never be attempted in a day in two papers. In universities, semester system allows us enough time to prepare for 5 papers at the end of semester. Nowhere such a lengthy course is to be passed in a one go. So this is the main point.


Inorganic Chemists will find Paper-I easy and Organic Chemists would find the other and those of physical would gave their own edges in the syllabus. But we have to realize that we have never prepared so long and vast syllabus at once.

Also, the trends of FPSC are very discouraging for us. The paper is set such that it milks away 20 to 25 marks from us. That is where the Chemistry aspirants lag behind. The advantage of high scoring being a science subject fires back and kills.

The paper is either too General or too difficult.

You can see the past papers, sometimes the papers are too general and students do not prepare such topics for example Paper-II of CE-2013 (Emulsions, Colloids, Gels etc). And somewhere it is overwhelmingly difficult like Paper-II of CE-2013 again ; Oxidize secondary alcohol to Aldehyde etc. I mean, somewhere examiner goes beyond the level of MSc or even MPhil and ask such conceptual things which they themselves had not taught to their students in their life times.

Chemistry is a very vast subject. Examiner has very broad margin to test us and unfortunately students have to prepare 1000 marks of other subjects in addition to chemistry as well.

In the End i want to tell you:-

Chemistry is scoring and high scoring; if by luck, the paper is according to your preparation. Chemistry can ruin you, if you receive the unexpected paper. So luck has a big part in it. In this context, chemistry can make you but it can break you as well. Risk factor is high, keep it in mind. Also preparing chemistry is very hectic job too.

I love Chemistry, I love this subject and i wished to slaughter the papers in CSS but the things did not happen so.

Chemistry Stuff

I have discussed in detail about the books to study for CSS.

You can download books from my post

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-optio...load-free.html





You can always ask me for any help regarding Chemistry Preparation on Forum and also my e-mail ID from my profile.


Best luck for your Chemistry, Regards
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Chintoo2010 For This Useful Post:
Ayesha Chemist (Sunday, March 17, 2013), Dreamer7 (Friday, May 12, 2017), Engr zaji (Saturday, June 06, 2015), Freedom Fighter (Saturday, September 13, 2014), maha786 (Tuesday, March 19, 2013), Pak Post (Monday, May 12, 2014)
  #2  
Old Sunday, March 17, 2013
Ayesha Chemist's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
Thanks: 76
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Ayesha Chemist is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you soo much for ur post. thats really quite helping. FPSC are why so much against Chemistry that they make so unattractive and distressing pudding of whole chemistry sylabii. Physical chemistry should not be in sylabii. Thats should be part of physics or Mathmatcis but not chemistry.
chemistry I and II paper should not conducted in one day
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Thursday, May 04, 2017
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kinz is on a distinguished road
Default

thank you for sharing your experience. what about your result? how much you scored in chemistry in 2012 & 2013? am going to opt for 2018.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Monday, October 02, 2017
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Multan
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sundas Ch is on a distinguished road
Default

should i opt chemistry For CSS exam..?as i am science student..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Q & A (Group Preferences, Pros & Cons of different Groups/Services) nadem Specialized Training Program (STP) 153 Wednesday, October 11, 2017 05:41 PM
Pros and cons of life abroad Muser Discussion 8 Tuesday, November 04, 2014 03:59 PM
economics: pros & cons leo111 Subject Selection 4 Monday, September 12, 2011 06:39 PM
Pros & Cons of AD ISI? Muhammad humayun Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) 27 Tuesday, March 01, 2011 01:36 PM
18th amendment: Pros and Cons, Criticism and Applause rose_pak Discussion 1 Tuesday, July 27, 2010 02:31 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.