Wednesday, April 24, 2024
01:37 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group II > Physics

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, May 10, 2009
moonsalpha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 103
Thanks: 38
Thanked 72 Times in 39 Posts
moonsalpha is on a distinguished road
Post The Universe is Collapsing?

The Universe is Collapsing?


I think Edwin Hubble was correct when he used red shift to prove that galaxies are moving at an accelerating rate away from each other. The question is what is causing the acceleration. The answer is simple. The universe is collapsing.

I think Edwin Hubble was correct when he used red shift to prove that galaxies are moving at an accelerating rate away from each other. The question is what is causing the acceleration. The answer is simple. The universe is collapsing.

I know at first it doesn't make sense. So let's start at the beginning. The Big Bang, first there was an infinitely small point that contained everything the universe is made of. This point was surrounded by absolute nothing. Something caused the point to burst. (I will explain later what that something is.) The point exploded into the nothing and the universe was born. This is where it gets interesting. I'm not going to explain the Big Bang in detail. We all know the basic theory. What I will do is try to explain the parts that didn't make sense to me when I first heard the theory many years ago.

First I have to employ the Higgs field. I know we don't like to use the Higgs field because it has been added and deleted so many times. That's why I need to take a minute and explain the Higgs field as one of the missing dimensions. Einstein's theory added time as a dimension. We all know that. We also know that spatial dimensions have three parts; length, width and height. I don't know why Einstein didn't mention that time had three parts. Time as we know it, time squared, and time stand still. I don't think I need to explain time as we know it and most of you know time squared is acceleration. Time stand still is the point where, as described by Einstein, something like a photon reaches the speed of light and time stops passing for that particle. I know what you're thinking. How does this prove anything about the Higgs field? I'm getting there I promise. I just wanted to show that what I am telling you is part of Einstein's theory, something we and he have overlooked. It was there all the time, but it was missed.

Okay that takes care of spatial and chronological dimensions and totals six. Now we have energy dimensions which all end up in the end being one dimension with many parts (The Higgs Field). I will simplify this by only breaking it into the parts we use today. First we have Gravity; I use it first because it was the first to take shape as far as I can tell. Second is the strong nuclear force; third we have the week nuclear force and finally the electromagnetic force. Don't loose interest yet, please.

When the point exploded into the nothing, acceleration created a bit of pressure on the leading edge of the expanding universe. (Remember we are talking about the first nanoseconds of time). This pressure allowed clumping and clumping would eventually give birth to matter and anti matter. What creates the pressure? The answer is the Higgs field. Acceleration can be felt even in zero gravity, therefore it is acting upon the expanding energy as it expands and creates the Higgs field which in time will become the sum of the forces. I hate to do it, but I need to take a side road for just a brief moment. I think even at the very first stage of matter, whether you believe it to be strings or brains or whatever, the equal and opposite antimatter also exists. When this matter and antimatter came to be, the clumping that created it also created a bit of chaos. Not every string was exactly the same as another. This means when the matter came into contact with its own opposite it was totally annihilated, but when it came into contact with its neighbor's opposite (not it's exact opposite) it wasn't necessarily totally annihilated. I think I just explained two things here. Okay more than two, but that will be a later article. First the fact that the matter and antimatter existed for a brief moment gave birth to a short burst of acceleration. Second we can now see why anti matter didn't devour all of the matter in the universe. I won't take the time in this article to show where all of the antimatter is, but rest assured it is there.

Okay back to the Higgs field. The leading edge of the expanding universe was under a bit more pressure than the rest and matter formed there first. That means that gravity took shape there first and drew in more matter which made gravity stronger which drew in more matter and so on. The fact that the leading edge of the universe (Try to picture the outer edge of a sphere or a disk) contained more matter than the rest of the universe meant that the first stars were formed there the first supernovas occurred there and the first black holes formed there. This is where the expansion and collapsing come together. At the outer edge one black hole swallows another and another and as it grows larger it devours more and more. Soon the black holes have become so large that they can suck up what we call a super massive black hole like nothing. This makes them bigger and stronger. We will call these mega super massive black holes. Now what happens when a mega super massive black hole collides with a couple more mega super massive black holes? It becomes an ultra mega super massive black hole. Have you ever wondered about the theory explaining gamma ray bursts? Maybe it's not the death of a massive star focused in two directions, maybe it is the energy escaping from the collision of two ultra mega super massive black holes. As far as I know, gamma ray bursts are always way out near the edge of the universe.

At some point the outward expanding momentum of the universe becomes weaker than the black hole's attraction and the ultra mega super massive black holes at the edge of the universe begin to fall toward one another and in the process the closer they get to galaxies in the inner part of the universe the more their powerful attraction pulls these objects out toward them. This is what makes it look like the universe is expanding when, in fact it is collapsing. In the end it will all return to the infinitely small point with so much force that it will explode again. (I told you I would explain what the something was; I had to wait until now because although it is the beginning it is also the end).

Your homework assignment is to prove me wrong. Don't be shy. Use math, common sense, elimination or whatever, but the keyword is prove. Don't imply. Prove me wrong.
__________________
-Better an ounce of luck than a pound of gold.
--Yiddish Proverb
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quran and science -Essay Muhammad Akmal Essays 7 Sunday, October 17, 2010 11:44 AM
The Beginning Of Time. SikanderHayat007 General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Saturday, March 28, 2009 07:05 PM
Creation of the Universe in the Light of Islam maiji Islamiat Notes 0 Friday, August 31, 2007 12:32 PM
Problem Of The Big Bang Theory Sureshlasi General Science & Ability 1 Friday, December 08, 2006 04:20 AM
Quran and Science Amoeba Islam 2 Monday, October 24, 2005 03:29 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.