CSS Forums

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)
-   Pure Mathematics (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-optional-subjects/group-ii/pure-mathematics/)
-   -   Pure Maths (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-optional-subjects/group-ii/pure-mathematics/4220-pure-maths.html)

abrowaqas Tuesday, June 27, 2006 07:12 PM

Pure Maths
 
Always we have given the COMPOSITE FUNCTIONS in that format i-e

f= something
g= something

and then we have to find "fog" and "gof" .....

but never in any book .. . composite functions are given then we have to find original functions...... i -e

fog= something
gof= something

f=??
g=??

...... if somebody have any idea about this problem then please discuss.....

(((AWA)))

elementofsurprize Saturday, July 01, 2006 01:47 PM

One Approach
 
One approach can be this. We start with given: g(f(x))= something.

Now, we easily conclude: Dom(g(f(x))=Dom(f(x))
Range(g(f(x))=Range(g(y)) (assuming that g is defined over y)

Keeping this in mind we can arbitrarily make two functions out of the given g(f(x)) function so that all the variables are grouped in one function which we will call f(x) and the whole will be g(f(x)).

For example: Given: g(f(x))=3x^2-2x-9. (^ stands for power)
We can arbitrarily say, f(x)=3x^2-2x. So g(y)=y-9#

Now, if we are given some conditions regarding the functions f or g then we can't break g(f(x)) arbitratily. We have to break it in a way that the conditions for f and g are also satisfied.

I hope this helps you. If there are questions then I am interested too.

Ashher Saturday, July 22, 2006 02:07 AM

Composition functions
 
MR. ElementOf surprise!
u have written a thing which is mathematically incorrect.
i.e.
if g(f(x)) = something ...that [U]does not [/U] imply that dom (g (f(x)) = dom (f(x)).
Consider the following counter example.....
Let f(x) = x^2. then Dom (g(f(x)) = postive real numbers and zero...however dom(f(x)) = All real numbers.


05:15 PM (GMT +5)

vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.