Aslamoalaikum
please any one give me comprehensive answer of this question

write a note on theory of Pakistan and two nation theory?

please suggest me good book for this or any link

As per my understanding, the question would be, Write a note on ideology of Pakistan(not theory of Pakistan), and Two nation theory. Am i right ?

If yes, than do consult Pak Affairs thread in the forum. You will easily get the answer.

Regards.
Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk

Two Nations Theory:

Actually Two Nations Theory was presented by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan. Two Nations theory is that Hindu and Muslims are completely two different nations from every perspective. We all Pakistanis, except some traitors who has the support of RAW, are thankful to Mr. Jinnah that due to his efforts we got an independent country Pakistan. We are enjoying our lives here with complete freedom due to the partition of subcontinent.

Two nation theory was based on facts, that Hindu and Muslim are completely two nations from every point of view. We have different languages, different histories, our heroes are their villains and vice versa, Hindu worship cows, but we Muslim slaughter it to eat, they drink the urine of cow, but we say it one of the most dirty things. With the exception of few like King Akbar who married non Muslim girls for his political motives, we don't intermarry or even don't eat with each other.

Before 1947 when a dog entered in the kitchen of a Hindu family and licked an utensil, then it was used after washing it, but if a Muslim touched any vessel of Hindu family, then they threw it, instead of using it after washing.

It should be remembered that in 1906 Mr. Jinnah first joined Indian National Congress, after that in 1913 he joined Muslim League. He struggled for Hindu Muslim unity due to which the joint session of Indian National Congress and Muslim League, famously known as Lucknow pact, was conducted at Lucknow in 1916. For his struggle of Hindu Muslim unity, he was called the ambassador of peace and unity. But the points on which Congress first agreed in Lucknow pact, later deviated from all those and due to persistent bullheadedness Mr. Muhammad Ali Jinnah resigned from Congress in 1920. Between 1913 and 1920 he remained the member of both parties.

When we see the poor condition of Muslims living in India, we thank that we have our own country Pakistan. As in India Modi banned the slaughter of cows and many Muslims were tortured and killed in suspect of cow slaughter. We are thankful that we are not living in a country where in 2002 in Gujrat more than 2500 Muslims were killed. A country where innocent Kashmiris are killed.

According to Human Rights Watch, about 20,000 Kashmiris are detained while using the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA). Soldiers and paramilitaries enjoy complete immunity from prosecution, unless the ministery of defence sanctions their trial.

So we all Pakistanis are thankful that we got independence as a separate nation where we are safe. Muslim and Hindu are different Nations from every perspective, social, economical, historical, and political.

Ppsc interview question about two nation theory


Why sir sayyed Ahmed Khan is called the founder of two nation theory??? In 712 there was two nations so why we always told about sir sayyed
Give me brief answer plZ

In 712 Muhammad Bin Qasim established his rule in Sindh for the very first time in the history. After him, Dehli Sultanate ruled sub-continent for about 600 years. There were two nations but both were living freely and happily. The scenario starts changing with the emergence of East India Company. Their aim was to transform India into their Colony. The lavish lifestyle of Muslims' rulers and their unawareness pave the way for Britishers. There was a time when Muslim rule was expanded throughout the India had become shrink to Dehli Darbar only. As Muslims were ruling India for the score of years, they were not happy to become a subject. The Muslims along with Hindus planned to start a mutiny against Britishers. Unfortunately, due to ill planning and a premature start, the war resulted in total disaster for them. In response, Britishers start brutality and imposing sanctions on Muslims. As they captured throne from Muslims so they believed that were behind the rebel. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan on that occasion tried hard to eliminate the misunderstanding between the two. Contrary to that, Britishers got their new partner in the face of Hindus. Both started conspiracies and in the last Hindi-Urdu Controversy was the final nail in the coffin of Indian nationalism in sub-continent. Their continuous anti-Muslims campaigns resulted in the two nations theory from Sir Syed.
The conclusion is that there were two religions but both consider themselves as a single nation. After War of Independence, Hindus inclined toward Britishers and anti-Muslim movements forced Sir Syed to use the word two nation for them for the very first time on the basis of their religion.

I hope, i am able to answer your query. Any correction is more than appreciated.

Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk

The two nations theory would appear as an untenable idea if analysed critically. The gist of the theory is that Hindus and Muslims are two different nations and religions and they, therefore, can not live together. Muslim Leagues' support for partition was based solely this theory. But the real causes of partition were altogether different from two nations theory. The real causes were political, economical and other social factors, like the fear of Hindu dominance over minority muslims.
The two nations theory fails to satisfy an unbiased and reasonable mind. It is to say that Muslims ruled over Hindus and sub-continent for centuries but they never thought of separating themselves from Hindus on the ground that the two nations are altogether different and therefore they can not live together.
Muslims enjoyed ruling over Hindus for centuries and when they were no longer the masters of the subcontinent, they feared Hindu rule. This fear was compelled the Muslims to safeguard their interests. For this, the Muslim leaders needed the support of the masses which they could not attract in real sense. Then dragging of religion in politics was a tactic to win masses' support.
Even after partition the population was of Muslims in the two countries was equal. So the conclusion is that economic and social differences outweigh the religious differences. Economic and social factors were the main causes of partition rather than two nations.
Why the two nations theory could not preclude the East Pakistan from going for separation? East and West Pakistan formed a nation according to two nations theory but economic and social factors separated the same nation that came into being on two nations theory.