Thursday, April 25, 2024
05:07 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group IV > History of Pakistan & India

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Wednesday, November 21, 2007
islamabadian786's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 15
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 7 Posts
islamabadian786 is on a distinguished road
Default Compare the Mahmood of Ghazna and Muhammad of Ghor.

Quote:
Assalam-o-alaikum: i have prepared from different books notes on this particular question. Plz tell me if the length of this question is enough for a 20 marks' question. Plz guruz of CSS do comment on its quality and quantity with suggestions and pieces of advice
Question
Compare the Mahmood of Ghazna and Muhammad of Ghor as Muslim conquerors and statesmen of the sub-continent.


Answer:
1-INTRODUCTION:

Muhammad Ghori and Sultan Mahmood are the two important personalities of Midieval age in sub-continent. Both were enterprising soldiers and invaded India time and again. A carefull and close scrutiny of their respective achievements and character show that they resembled each other in more than one respect and differed in many respects. An overview of both the leaders is given below.


2-AN OVERVIEW OF MUHAMMAD GHORI:

Following are the salient features of the life and qualities of Muhammad Ghori.

i-Great Politician:
He was a great politician and a far sighted statesman. He fully realizedthe rotten political condition of India and therefore decided to establish permanent kingdom here.

ii-Shrewd Diplomat:

He was a shrewd diplomat as he could deal with every type of friend or foe. He exploited the enemies' weaknesses to his benefit.

iii-perseverence:

He was a determined to reach his goal. Despite many failures he never stopped to realize his plans.

iv-Choice of Men:

In choice of men, he displayed singular talent for the slaves like Aibak, Yalduz and Tughril, he owed most of the success.

v-contribution to Establish Turkish Rule:

His contribution to establishment of Turkish Rule in India can not be over-emphasized.

vi-Wider Conquests:

His campaigns stretched from Afghanistan to Bengal. This is evident of his great vision and tact to organize vast military campaigns.

vii-Steady Builder:

He was a steady builder of his empire. Despite frequent setbacks he advanced steadily towards his empire-building goal.

3-AN OVERVIEW OF MAHMOOD OF GHAZNA:

Following ar the salient features of the life oand qualities of Sultan Mahmood of Ghazna.

i-Administration of Justice:

He was particularly famous for his administration of justice. He meted out justice to all irrespective of caste and creed.

ii-Generelship:

He is considered to be one of the greatest generals of Muslim World. He never suffered a defeat.

iii-Unity of His Army:

He had heterogeneous army consisting of Turks, Arabs, and Hindus, but with the tactful handling of Sultan this army became invincible.

iv-Greatest King:

A great leader of men, a just ruler, a gifted soldier, a dispenser of justice, and a patron of letters, he deserves to be ranked as the greatest king of his age.



4-COMPARISON BETWEEN MUHAMMAD GHORI & MAHMOOD OF GHAZNA:

These two conquerors and kings have been compared in following respects.

i-As General & Soldier:

Mahmood was far more a great general than Muhammad Ghori and the military career of the former was far more brilliant that that of later. Sultan Mahmood never suffered a defeat in his seventeen campaigns of India. Whereas Ghori suffered many crushing defeats and his successes were mainly due to his able lieutenants Qutbuddin Aibak and Ikhtiyaruddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji.

ii-As Founders of Muslim Empire in India:

Muhammad Ghori has been called the founder of the Muslim empire in INdia. He took great care i consolidating his conquests. He rendered a great service to the cause of Islam in the sub-continent. Whereas Sultan Mahmood invaded India either to collect the wealth of HIndu Temples or to chastise the disaffected Hindu Rajas. With the exception of Punjab his invasions did not last longer.

iii-As Statesmen:
They both were great statesmen. Ghori found India suitable for making his empire in India due to his failures against Khwarism Shah in Afghanistan. Whereas Sultan Mahmood of Ghazna built the Ghaznavid empire in Afghanistan and enriched it with the wealth of India. Both of conquerors acted like a real statesman.

iv-As Patrons of Art & Learning:

The chief work that has immortalized Mahmood of Ghazna's name was his patronage of learning and literature. He gathered a large number of poets and scholars in his court like al-Beruni, Utbi, and Firdausi. He built museum and many magnificent buildings. On the other hand Ghori had interest in the patronage of art and laearning but lesser than Sultan Mahmood of Ghazna. The celebrated philosopher and savant Fakhruddin Razi and the famous classical poet Nizami Uruzi adorned the Ghorid court. Sultan Mahmood built "Celestial Bride" and Jam-i-Masjid of Ghazni. He had a library a museum and many other buildings.

5-Conclusion:
Both Sultan Muhammad Ghori and Mahmood Ghaznavi had great and rare qualities of head and heart. As Ghori was a steady builder and master of art of selecting the best man for the job, Ghaznavi as a general is rated as one of the greatest generals of Muslim History. But the contribution of Sultan Muhammad Ghori towards establishing Muslim rule in Indo Pakistan region is something that has had far reaching results and all the muslims of Indo Pak region owe him very much in this respect.
__________________
"A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him." (David Brinkley)

Last edited by Last Island; Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 04:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to islamabadian786 For This Useful Post:
Bhalla Changa (Wednesday, November 21, 2007), MRSANGRA (Tuesday, November 27, 2007)
  #2  
Old Thursday, February 21, 2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: RAHIM YAR KHAN
Posts: 3
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
greatmansoori is on a distinguished road
Default

This answer is excellent for 15 marks but not for 20 marks please extend it

it is according to my point of view it may be right or may be wrong

Last edited by Aarwaa; Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 05:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Friday, February 22, 2008
Muhammad T S Awan's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: AppreciationDiligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of Uncia Uncia :)
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 1,731
Thanked 2,264 Times in 1,100 Posts
Muhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant future
Default

AOA

brother mashALLAH its a good piece of writing. but i doubt whether you would be able to write al this stuff in 25-30 minutes?? bcoz for a question of 20 marks you have to write material in maximum of 25-30 minutes.

further, you must add quotations from some authors/historians suiting the personaliy/generalship/soldiery/expeditions of both Mahmud of Ghuzna and Muhammad of Ghori.

Brother please note that armies of both Ghuznavi's and Ghori's were having heterogeneous elements consisting of Turks, Arabs, and Hindus etc..

yes both were having qualities of brain and bran. In soldiering Mahmud was a great soldier and general contrary to Muhammad. But Muhammad was having persevering character and farsighted thinking. In terms of far reaching results Muhammad is considered an important figure because he was able to establish his rule in India .......
__________________
'Thee woh ik shakhs kay tasawar saay - abb woh ranayee khayal kahaan'
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
indo pak notes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.