[QUOTE=abidkhan;1095682]You are right.And about public administration ,they even didn't care about their own provided syllabus plus there is no quality material in the market on public administration .Previous syllabus contained quality topics but look at the recent one.Quite haphazard and full of strange topics.Now all we can do is hoping for the best.[/QUOTE]
I think that topics are not an issue, but available material is

[QUOTE=nqayyum;1095542]International law is the only paper of mine which went very bad. I am afraid it would be the only paper which would fall me in the failure zone. This time my attempt went superb except for the international law. Though I would easily get 14-15 marks in MCQs part but I am not confident to get 20 marks at the most in the subjective part.:mad:[/QUOTE]
A friend had 13 mcqs right in 2018 in US history and she got 23 or 26 in the whole paper. They gave her less then 15 out of the rest of paper. So we will have to see when the results are out

I am a Public Administration graduate and I think that the Syllabus was made by some senior bureaucrat who added a lot of things that they learned over the years and the examiners are political sciences people because they focus on theories a lot. Now lets see the results. I have been told that NOA academy made a lot of 2020 people pick p ad, because it was scoring in 2018.

[QUOTE=abidkhan;1095573]I think you performed well in mcqs section and personally I feel that objective portion has alot of impact on your subjective performence.I managed up to 17 marks in mcqs but the nature of the said paper was quite different .Due to its openess one can not hold fair grip on each topic.[/QUOTE]

I just pray for 33 marks, not even 34, to pass this paper. the only paper I am worried about.

[QUOTE=IamIronMan;1095689]A friend had 13 mcqs right in 2018 in US history and she got 23 or 26 in the whole paper. They gave her less then 15 out of the rest of paper. So we will have to see when the results are out[/QUOTE]

this is the reason I am perturbed. FPSC doesn't give marks on the number of sheets written rather the relevant and quality material. Though I attempted all the questions having a far-flung idea about, but the answers were not up to mark.

[QUOTE=abidkhan;1095573]I think you performed well in mcqs section and personally I feel that objective portion has alot of impact on your subjective performence.I managed up to 17 marks in mcqs but the nature of the said paper was quite different .Due to its openess one can not hold fair grip on each topic.[/QUOTE]Can u share International Law CSs MCQs 2019. It will be great service to all.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[QUOTE=IamIronMan;1095386]This subject is interesting and maybe helpful in other subjects, but it is technical and one needs to memorize stuff for it. I know that the fault is mine that I couldn't prepare properly for this in my 2019 attempt, but the paper was too out of the course. Gone are the days when they use to ask direct questions, now they are asking too much of analytical questions. We have to prepare really well and there aren't many books that are equip with the right knowledge. Even books like Kapoor lack the material. Anyone else here that wants to talk about their 2019 Int law experience.[/QUOTE]Anyone who has especially 2019 and 2017 CSS International Law Mcqs kindly share.

It will be great service for all of us.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

If u have CSS 2019 MCQs kindly share.

Jazakallah

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[QUOTE=Cheetaa;1095709]If u have CSS 2019 MCQs kindly share.

Jazakallah

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]

Some MCQs of 2019 have been shared on this thread:

[url]http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-2019-papers/123099-international-law-2019-paper-2.html[/url]

This whole situations occurs because we are told certain assumptions about certain subjects. We rely on other's experience and DMCs to pick subjects. The scoring trends change every year and no one has the same experience for same subject, so we should select subjects that appeal us.