Which defination of international law is applicable??
 

Salam to all seniors..I am starting international law today..O checked the past papers where i saw one question in which it is asked to provide a defination of international law which cover all the aspects under consider now a days?? so i want to ask seniors which defination they recommend??Defination of international law by Starke or defination of international law by schwazenberger?? and do i have to prepare other definations ?? almost all of them just concentrate on State relations only..so i don't feel i need to prepare those too..Waiting for your reply

No one replied?? :confused: --- not even mods??

Anyways i will add one more question if anyone bothered to reply ..

How many sources do we have for international law??

Customs
Treaties
General principles of law recognized by civilian nations
judical decisions
writing of jurists
equity
resolutions of general assembly

Is that it??

[QUOTE=khanbaba512;330265]No one replied?? :confused: --- not even mods??

Anyways i will add one more question if anyone bothered to reply ..

How many sources do we have for international law??

Customs
Treaties
General principles of law recognized by civilian nations
judical decisions
writing of jurists
equity
resolutions of general assembly

Is that it??[/QUOTE]
You have mentioned correct list of the sources.

[QUOTE=khanbaba512;329998]Salam to all seniors..I am starting international law today..O checked the past papers where i saw one question in which it is asked to provide a defination of international law which cover all the aspects under consider now a days?? so i want to ask seniors which defination they recommend??Defination of international law by Starke or defination of international law by schwazenberger?? and do i have to prepare other definations ?? almost all of them just concentrate on State relations only..so i don't feel i need to prepare those too..Waiting for your reply[/QUOTE]

There are several defininations by different authors. Some are old and some are new. The old definiation like given by phpinem are not accepted now coz int law has witnessed many changes after the second world war.
Starke has defined very well.

[QUOTE=aariz;330271]There are several defininations by different authors. Some are old and some are new. The old definiation like given by phpinem are not accepted now coz int law has witnessed many changes after the second world war.
Starke has defined very well.[/QUOTE]

shukar ha yar koi mera bhai tu hai yahan..Bro starke wali definition tu theek ha lekin multiple books ka ek aur nuksan yeh ha k O.H agarwal ki book mein author ne kaha ha k yeh b future mein reject hojae gi..he mentioned schwarzenberger's definition..So thats why i am confused..Purani definition tu prepare krne ki zururat nahi ha na mjhe ..?The question i mentioned in my first post asked for a single definition which conver all the aspects ..So thats why i am asking for the suggestion..

[QUOTE=khanbaba512;330279]shukar ha yar koi mera bhai tu hai yahan..Bro starke wali definition tu theek ha lekin multiple books ka ek aur nuksan yeh ha k O.H agarwal ki book mein author ne kaha ha k yeh b future mein reject hojae gi..he mentioned schwarzenberger's definition..So thats why i am confused..Purani definition tu prepare krne ki zururat nahi ha na mjhe ..?The question i mentioned in my first post asked for a single definition which conver all the aspects ..So thats why i am asking for the suggestion..[/QUOTE]

Starke's definition covers the all aspects of the law.

Yes, the definition will vary coz of changes in the subject's scope and dimensions. Before first world war, the Int. law had different definition and after the 2nd world war, the dimensions of the subject changed. In result, the new authors came up with new definitions. It happens with all subjects of social science. The definitions of psychology and economics vary with the time as their scope covers other areas with the passage of time.

Thanks bro..One more question i want to ask..Kindly tell me the object and purpose of int.Law..Basis tu mil hi gyi hain but what actually the want us when they ask about object and purpose..?

I am not asking for notes..Mat sun k bhag jao.:haha.Just hints..

[QUOTE=khanbaba512;330593]Thanks bro..One more question i want to ask..Kindly tell me the object and purpose of int.Law..Basis tu mil hi gyi hain but what actually the want us when they ask about object and purpose..?

I am not asking for notes..Mat sun k bhag jao.:haha.Just hints..[/QUOTE]

LOL. Why will not I answer ur query? Whateva, i know, I will share and try my level best.
coming to the topic, dear, the purpose of the international law is :
1. Primarily, its all about states' interests
2. secondly, International law is developed and agreed upon by those that make up the international system, but not every nation state is a member or has a part in the process.

Thanks Bro :)

I think i can finish this subject in 6 days.Peace of cake as far as Ratta is concerned