i need advice from senior members.....
 

should I go for psychology? this is the only question I am confuse about I am engineer so I have no previous knowledge of the subject. and also evryone around me is just keeps on teeling me that it is going to be a disaster this year is it so....? than what should I select my other options are geography punjabi and so far journalism(I am sticking with it but I keep thinking about sociology n public ad.). please do reply to this post seniors....

[QUOTE=bushra zahra;607820]should I go for psychology? this is the only question I am confuse about I am engineer so I have no previous knowledge of the subject. and also evryone around me is just keeps on teeling me that it is going to be a disaster this year is it so....? than what should I select my other options are geography punjabi and so far journalism(I am sticking with it but I keep thinking about sociology n public ad.). please do reply to this post seniors....[/QUOTE]

If you have personal aptitude for psychology go for it, it'll fetch you really a good score even if papera are not upto the mark. This what scores of 2 years suggest. Its really a thing to cared for that you need score to get group of your choice or even allocation in this high competition. So I'll suggest you to stick to it and prepare it with sound and relaxed mind. Same rumors were also for css 2013 attempt but many many people have opted it. Wish you best of luck.

I am Law graduate , alongwith Law group , can I opt for Psychology !!

[QUOTE=taimz;607827]I am Law graduate , alongwith Law group , can I opt for Psychology !![/QUOTE]

Yeah if you have aptitude for psychology you can opt it. First I'll recommend you to have alook at the syllabus and past papers and decide if you find yourself comfortable with it.

2013' Psychology paper was creative rather difficult

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hey listen carefully, dnt go for rumors, people who use to say that Psychology is disastrous, i can do nothing for them except smiling upon their innocent feelings. there year paper was not difficult . It would be more appropriate to say Psychology's papers creative rather difficult and disastrous . And so far i think , first time in the history os CSS such a creative paper has been asked. There is a huge difference between creative and difficult papers. Psychology's papers were upto the standard of CSS.
Iwant to ask from my fellows if such papers are not made what would be the standard? How can one differeniate between a standard preparation and a poor preparation? Dont you people want to differeniate yourself from those people who used to study 20-20 question series, Sherbano,Rakshanda, exam Cram ? If such type of questions are not asked guys who read such rubbish would be equal to those who used to read standard material?
what about those who made selective studies? Do you people want selective readers and thorough readers would enjoy equivalent status?
Believe me papers were not difficult and if some body say like this i use to be on skype from 11pm onwards , get online with me i will convince one.
you know what happened this year in Psychology, all those who make are habitual of making selective studies are ruined to nothing , also who study below standard text were unable to give themselves a solid stand against the blows of Psychology.
There was 100% choice against questions which are moulded, but what can one expect from those who make selective studies, and leave portions like social Psychology?

For instance, if difficult question is asked from Nervous system , Social Psychology is always there as an substitute , and this year simple question is asked about "attitude" from Social Psychology. What else one needs?
Same happened in Paper 2.

Patron is not changed , FPSC had asked nothing out of syllabus, everything was verymuch under the paradigms of syllabus , prescribed by them. What happened this year, FPSC asked unexpected questions , but why dont you people understand those questions are the part of your syllabus .

My advice for you is that dont go for rumors, rumors are without logic, i scored twice more than 160 in Psychology , without any background, i even never studied biology in my whole life , i used to be on skype daily 12 am onwards and guide regarding my subject, if things are still not getting crystallized clear over here contact me there, i try my best to resolve your queries.
my id is in my profile

[QUOTE=shoaib khan12;616707]2013' Psychology paper was creative rather difficult

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hey listen carefully, dnt go for rumors, people who use to say that Psychology is disastrous, i can do nothing for them except smiling upon their innocent feelings. there year paper was not difficult . It would be more appropriate to say Psychology's papers creative rather difficult and disastrous . And so far i think , first time in the history os CSS such a creative paper has been asked. There is a huge difference between creative and difficult papers. Psychology's papers were upto the standard of CSS.
Iwant to ask from my fellows if such papers are not made what would be the standard? How can one differeniate between a standard preparation and a poor preparation? Dont you people want to differeniate yourself from those people who used to study 20-20 question series, Sherbano,Rakshanda, exam Cram ? If such type of questions are not asked guys who read such rubbish would be equal to those who used to read standard material?
what about those who made selective studies? Do you people want selective readers and thorough readers would enjoy equivalent status?
Believe me papers were not difficult and if some body say like this i use to be on skype from 11pm onwards , get online with me i will convince one.
you know what happened this year in Psychology, all those who make are habitual of making selective studies are ruined to nothing , also who study below standard text were unable to give themselves a solid stand against the blows of Psychology.
There was 100% choice against questions which are moulded, but what can one expect from those who make selective studies, and leave portions like social Psychology?

For instance, if difficult question is asked from Nervous system , Social Psychology is always there as an substitute , and this year simple question is asked about "attitude" from Social Psychology. What else one needs?
Same happened in Paper 2.

Patron is not changed , FPSC had asked nothing out of syllabus, everything was verymuch under the paradigms of syllabus , prescribed by them. What happened this year, FPSC asked unexpected questions , but why dont you people understand those questions are the part of your syllabus .

My advice for you is that dont go for rumors, rumors are without logic, i scored twice more than 160 in Psychology , without any background, i even never studied biology in my whole life , i used to be on skype daily 12 am onwards and guide regarding my subject, if things are still not getting crystallized clear over here contact me there, i try my best to resolve your queries.
my id is in my profile[/QUOTE]

Bhai thanks for guidance.please suggest book for psycology for beginner.is it wise to start with Sherbano book.

[QUOTE=bushra zahra;607820]should I go for psychology? this is the only question I am confuse about I am engineer so I have no previous knowledge of the subject. and also evryone around me is just keeps on teeling me that it is going to be a disaster this year is it so....? than what should I select my other options are geography punjabi and so far journalism(I am sticking with it but I keep thinking about sociology n public ad.). please do reply to this post seniors....[/QUOTE]

I have also opted it being an engineer . You can do it without academy or tuitions too . But , i prefer to get guidance or coaching from any good teacher as it is a medical type of subject . Stay blessed .

need help ..
 

is psychology a very lenghty subj?? then other subjs n is it easy to cover i, how much time does it requires m an average student.

[QUOTE=funky;630201]is psychology a very lenghty subj?? then other subjs n is it easy to cover i, how much time does it requires m an average student.[/QUOTE]

yes it is lengthy , but not difficult to handle . And it is quite interesting .