1. plus points being the part of coalition it will enhance the strategic importance of country provided
2. pakistan can use this military coaltion at the expense of saudi arabia to establish peace in pakistan
3. the deployment of military troops will ensure america on side that haqqani are no more there to threatn peace in afghanistan against us intrests
4. on the other hand pakistan at the expense of saudi led coalition will be able to bring talibans on table of negitiations
5. thereby will be able to keep an eye on indian intrests through proxy wars
6. hence will be able to make strategic influnce in region
7. beside able to maintain balance of power in south asia against indian war mongering
8. whether country should join or not?
9. if join then
10. will pursue its own national intrest keeping in view the importance of peace in afghanistan
11. will ensure to coaltion partners to settle sectarian conflicts via negotiations
12. should ensure to solve tensions between iran and saudi arabia via negotiations
13. should ensure to counter isis and other global terrorists organizations in a UN peace keeping troops like fashion where soldiers of different nationalities are there
14. if not join then
15. will be neutral and any kind of sect conflict if rise will get less support from coalition partners and invite antagonistic forces to create trouble through afghanistan

The federation element in USA is not national power but national integrity or say fusion of ethnic identities into a national identity that then contributes positively towards the national power.

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

__________________
Hope is a good thing, may be the best of things, and no good thing ever dies.

Dont worry its just and effort.i hadnot read question well i hadnot answered in context of pakistan but from middle east prospective....i know how many beans make five.......

However the balkan states are an illustrious example of weak national power.

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

__________________
Hope is a good thing, may be the best of things, and no good thing ever dies.

They were strong and there is no distinction that only national power has the capacity to make different ethnolinguistic units together.By loosing the spirit of nationalism ,ussr disintegrated as well as Yugo perished away from planet earth.
I hope you can pinpoint more.

This qoute fits where asked if pakistan does not join?.examiner asked pros and cons

As far Alliance question is concerned previously i read about its implications in Dawn news i forget writers name but his articles always published on Sunday in Dawn news. Trying to be neutral i first discuss its sectarian aspect, its linking with extremism and terrorism and its implication on Operation zarb i azb. Then on positive side i discuss Pakistan can play role in lessening tensions between Iran and saudia, then i gave example of successful partnership between saudia and Pakistan in defeating Al Qaeda how they can by forming alliance can defeat common threats in region ( middle east). I started my question with introduction then headings and sub headings and at the end with conclusion.
Time management was main issue in IR paper there were lots of things to write and within limited time frame. Now result will reveal lots of Hidden facts :-)

Really Barre bhai,
Just fused the different perspective and than make an intro( remember Intro= mini essay notion)all things I have discussed later on was summarized in intro.

Do tell me the meaning of federation first?
Than what is the difference between national integrity and national power?
kindly read "National Patriotism act" as proposed by Bush.

Now in true sense you've deviated from the topic, which is demanded.
For example, yahan India Walt story to bilkul nhy Katy.
Afghanistan kahan se tapak pra?
Taliban k lye nhy ye anti Isis led coalition he.
Do you know freedom fighters of USA in Syria or simply called "moderate rebels" are alqaeda members.