This is the best outline I've seen so far! No deviation from the topic. Hope you carried that well in the paper. If the theory of 'Just War' had been included in the outline that would have made it an ideal one.

BEING MINORITY IS A FATE NO ONE WANTS.CAN NATIONALISM BE REALLY INCLUSIVE?
1.intro
-Constitutionally, minorities possess a secure fate but practically they are living a miserable life.
-Nationalism can't be inclusive because it is a rigid ideology which creates divisions ,radical minds and hatred.
2.Fate of Minorities in constitions:
-UN Declaration on human rights
-Constitution of Pakistan: Articles 25,27,28.
3.The real fate of Minorities:
a).Deprived of social,political,and religious rights.
b).Survival at risk
c).Facing Harrasment
d).Forced conversions.
e).Religious places not safe
4.Are minorities in Pakistan happy with their fate?
5.Role of Nationalism in persecution of minorities.
6.Nationalism can't be inclusive:
-fundamentally based on fixed ideas.
-Demands devotion to a single ideology.
-Antithesis of multiculturalism
7.Even,plural societies of the world have been abandoning their inclusive trends in the wake of nationalism.
-Brexit
-European Countries' attitude towards Syrian war refugees.
-Election of Donald Trump
8.Countries established on the name of Nationalism have failed to be inclusive.
-Israel
-Pakistan.
9.Suggesting to make Nationalism inclusive and to improve the fate of minorities.
10.Conclusion.
Wrote 17 pages.I might have missed some points,can't recall.

__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"

Anything in brackets was not part of outline, Its just to give you guys a sense of what I wrote in the essay

- Introduction

- What is a Mentality

• Defining mentality

• How it creates social structures (how a mentality creates a societal mindset and worldview)

• How it establishes social norms and values (how it forms established norms within society)

- What is a Colonial mentality

• Defining a colonial mentality (what it is and where it was formed and comes form)

• How it was perceived historically and today (colonial mindset in the past is very different to how it is used today due to social changes and transformation of society, so I explained how it was used in the past and how it is different today)

• Characteristics of a colonial mentality (listed 6 and described each)

- Colonial mentality an Impediment to Pakistan

• A historical perspective (from 1947 onwards explained using 5 examples how it impeded Pakistans progress)

• Current scenario (5 examples to support my argument on how it is impeding Pakistans progress today)

- Consequences of a colonial mentality (this point is the extension of the last point, the results of colonial mentality impeding Pakistans progress throughout history and today. What negative results have we seen due to it. Gave 6 examples and explained each)

- Remedies to this issue (how we can overtime and slowly remove a colonial mindset from Pakistan. Gave 6 examples)

- Conclusion

Life is no life without controversy. But why one should not choose safe havens of conformism.

I have almost completely ignored controversy part in my essay. may be mentioned at some place.

Focussed on conformity instead, conformity vs rebel was debate

But what i fear is that i also ignored 'Save Haven' term. Which gives a more temporary effect to the topic. Like if it means, if a person is Non Conformist, he should not choose conformity as a requirement. In a way save haven term link essay more to Controversy.

Dont know to what extent i missed the topic.

"Modernity is an unending project"

> Thesis statement

> Introduction

> Argument:
* Man's journey from cave to the moon.
* Modernity; the way and will of the nature
* New ideas transform the world more than anything else.

> Illustrations and examples :
Modernity has brought the mankind a long way:
* From caves to the sky scrappers.
* From millions of deaths by malaria and cholera to the cure of cancer.
* From being under the wrath of floods to the construction of gigantic dams.
* From state of isolation to the connected world of television and internet.
* From the futile flying efforts of Icarus to Leonardo Da Vinci's drawings of the flying machine and the aeroplanes.
* From aeroplanes to the space missions and satellites.
* From barbarian and authoritative regimes to the modern democratic state system.
*From round the year dreadful wars to the world of diplomacy and peace
* From sheer victimization of women to the women empowerment campaigns.

> Conclusion

P.S: There were a few more points in the examples' section but I can recall only this much now.

I do not recall the exact outline
Feminism is not really a third world issue.

Introduction
Operationalizing constructs/concepts
feminism (theory and achievement)
(Third world (using the concept of development in IR:third second and first worlds were explained in terms of definition and examples)
issue?
what does this topic mean?
History of feminism
First Wave (definition scope and achievements with time period)
Second Wave
Third Word
arguments
Common feminist problems in "All worlds" (harassment, glass ceiling etc)
UN focus
organizations
Inclusion of gender equality, as a SDG goal, for all countries of the world)
Focus of the Third wave of feminism/postmodern feminism
Opposing arguments
Focusing only on the history and proposition of the second wave of feminism
Availability of more rights in developed world than Third world like education etc
Mechanisms in first world to address issues of feminism
Countering the opposing arguments
Mechanisms to address the feminists issues in the Thirld world
Information influence theory
Applying information influence theory to counter the argument to those who focus only on second wave of feminism
Conclusion

i attempt is modern war not holy war.I discussed all of modern war with their history and prove that some war is holy war and some of them is not holy war like balauchistan war is nationalist war.It is not holy war.There is no way for examiner this time that he will not pass me.Insha ALLAH i will pass essay this time.I discussed every thing in my essay

1) Introduction

“ We the people of United nations affirm to prevent the scourge of war, which twice in our life time has brought untold sorrows to the mankind..”—UN Charter Preamble

United Nations, despite its increasing international military engagements, has not been able to ensure peace. And has belied the essence of its charter.


2) Brief Overview of International military engagements by the United Nations
3) International military engagements by the United Nations and peace
4) How Despite increasing international Military engagements by the UN world is not moving towards peace
(4.1) Plight of Syrians continues unabated despite increasing international military engagements by the UN
(4.2) Yemen crisis continues to fester and the peace still remains elusive despite international military engagement by the UN
(4.3) China remains undeterred in South China Sea
(4.4) Despite UN’s involvement in Israel, Israel continues to expand its settlements in Palestine, which has resulted in intermittent clashes between the warring parties
(4.5) Other UN’s military engagements and their failure
(1) Peace keeping mission in South Sudan
(2) Peace keeping mission in Columbia
(3) Peace keeping mission in Central African Republics (CAR)
(5) Why despite UN’s increasing international military engagement world is not moving towards peace
(5.1) UNSC represents old geopolitical power balance, which affects its effectiveness
(5.2) Disunity among its veto-wielding Permanent members
(5.3) UN’s State-centric approach affects its ability to address contemporary challenges, which are largely intra-state
(5.4) Organizational inefficiency and Weak position of UN Secretary General

(6) How Can United nations be reformed
(1) Reforming the structure of UNSC in accordance with contemporary geopolitical realities
(2) Restrictions on the exercise of Veto
(3) Revamping the organizational structure to reclaim its efficiency
(4) De-politicization of the post of Secretary General

(7) Conclusion

Is holy war are modern war?
Introduction
1 war in pakistan between ttp and pakistan army is holy war (musharaf attack on lal masjid create TTP now ttp wants sharia on basis of sword and they are against democratic principle)
2 war between Taliban and america is holy war( Taliban govern over afghanistan on basis of sharia from 1996 to 2001 after 9/11 attack war continue america want democratic governement and taliban want sharia however america established democratic government to some extent in form of karzai adminstration)
3 War between balauch nationalist and pakistan army is nationalist war not holy war ( insurgency of 1958-59,62-63,73-77,2004 to onward started by bughti they are used by raw and want separation of balauchistan so it is not holy war)
4 war in syria is holy war (it is started when bashar ul asad misteat some of people who write against bishar ul asad) sunni insurgency strated.Iran and russia support bishaar ul asad and saudi arabi ,Uae,turkey support sunni rebellion.Other countries america,france
are also involved.Bishar ul asad wants shia government and sunni wants sunni governemnt so called its holy war)
5 war between india and pakistan is holy war( it is strated when maharaja hari signed insturment of accession that is against independence act of 1958 according to which it is will of kashmir to joined with any country so this instrument of accession violate kashmirian right.Hindu does not want peace even before creation of pakistan due to religious difference.War of 1948,1965 are fight on kashmir.Main reason is religious difference)
6) political element ( i discussed poltician who used this holy war for their purposes and political factor also has main role in this holy war)

soloution of all of war i discusses

and uno role whose member already involved in dispute.My writing is too short still i wrote 15-16 pages.If my writing is large then i wrote up 25 pages) however i don't believe on writing and filling pages.I believe on writing to point and quality material.As it is written to discussed modern war therfore i only discussed modern war.I don't any other war.Now it is up to examiner where as i proved every thing in my essay and if he still wrong my essay then he checked essay according to his own imagination.However i make well refined outline on democracy,education,woman but he did not give paper from these important topics.I write its on basis of my knowledge

Essay:- Literature is a lonely Planet of idealists.

OUTLINE:-

INTRODUCTION :- literature is not a lonely Planet of idealists. It is a necessary tool to make one's life ideal.

Supporting arguments :

1- literature makes distinction between right and wrong.

2- Literature is a great source of critical information.

3- Literature adds to man's knowledge.*

4- literature keeps morality alive in a society.

5- literature provides knowledge about different cultures and civilizations.

6- literature gives lessons from history.

7- literature brings man closer to nature.

8- literature provides knowledge of science.

9- muslims were on zenith of glory when they gave importance to literature.

10- literature is personal experience of writer.

11- developed nations have best literature in the world.

12- All great men of history were lovers of literature.

13- literature entertains people.

14- literature provides knowledge about economic policies of different era.

CONCLUSION :- Summary of essay

( I wrote an almost similar outline. There are some some points missing. I wrote 17 arguments.)

I guess very few people opted this topic.