|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Very tough paper yr:
I attempted q4) I explained hot pursuit and how a country cannot pursue the crime beyond a certain point despite the crime being committed in its territory. Second, in case of asylum seeking in any other country then it depends if the two countries have any agreement on extradition or not. If not then the country can not pursue the case further. Third, in case of immunity clause then even on its territory the state can't pursue the criminal suit and can only deport the person. But in case the immunity is waived by sending country, or the person returns later, without the diplomatic status he can be persecuted. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Some of the mcqs hat I remember:
De facto recognition is.... Pacta sunt servanda Jes cogens... Sic standibus... Estrada doctrine.. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Actually what made the paper difficult was the open endedness of the question. You could have attended it in multiple ways.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Territorial sea
Limit of territorial waters Double criminality Father of int. Law John Austin Estrada doctrine Recognition of state is De facto recognition is Pacta sunt servanda Ric bus stantibus Withdrawal of recognition Positivism and naturalism Extradition is Jus cogens International economic regulation |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Responsibility to protect
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Question no. 4
In question no 4, I wrote about what territorial jurisdiction means. I wrote under which case the principle of territorial jurisdiction faces problem as in when a crime begins in one state and completes in another, and that both the states may claim territorial jurisdiction on the basis of subjective and objective jurisdiction. I then briefly elaborated that the state where the crime has taken place has more sound claim due to two reason: 1. That it’s social order is affected 2. That it’s national interest or any national may be injured. After that, I concluded my answer.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Syed Fahad Sethi For This Useful Post: | ||
Usama Shahid (Thursday, February 21, 2019) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
is ka answer kia tha ... Political and financial?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The width of territorial waters
Waters within state's territory Recognition of new state Estrada Doctrine Which type of recognition can be taken back Which type of recognition is circumstantial Which article of ICJ mentions the sources of I law Diff between Responsibility for action and IHL (I guess) Father of I law Relation between positivists and naturalists (This is all I remember now. Overall it was the most difficult paper I ever dealt with.) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
exactly
same here ;( i hope i'll get passing marks atleast :'( ni tu second attempt |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
latest MCQs on C.A and General knowledge | sono punam | Current Affairs | 2 | Friday, November 22, 2019 11:16 PM |
International Law Notes | bilawalsanghroo | International Law | 19 | Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 PM |
International relation notes. | Zohaib786 | International Relations | 0 | Friday, September 30, 2011 07:32 PM |
International Relations: Theories and application | Fortune | International Relations | 0 | Sunday, March 27, 2011 02:37 PM |