CSS Forums - Precis and Composition Paper 2011

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)

- CSS 2011 Papers (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-papers-1971-2017/css-2011-papers/)

- - Precis and Composition Paper 2011 (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-papers-1971-2017/css-2011-papers/45541-precis-composition-paper-2011-a.html)

examiner knew well the title and book.anybody reproduced the author's title,will not be awarded.↲he wana to see ur reasoning not the manipulation.↲However↲↲q num 2 ansz summary,↲KnOWLEDGE have diachoronicle approach and understanding synchronicle.knowledge have is whole and under standing part of it.↲↲perception is person acquisition of knowledge and these perceptiön can b made diachronicle.↲Media..books.manuscripts.↲↲Hamlet is the knowledge of understanding of shakespeare.↲Bale jibrael of iqbal.↲And that of ALLAH is creation.0man ,women,animals.↲holy books.↲Allah's perception perfect while man has weakness.↲My title was,↲SOCIAL MOBILITY CREATES MORAL DEPRIVITY

Paper is very simple, it opens opportunity for candidates to get good marks in this paper. Those who studied under my guidance, must be happy, I wish all of them best of luck and pray for all candidates to accomplish their desire objectives.

my title was ....

[COLOR="Sienna"]The psychological causes of unhappiness[/COLOR]

well i m confused though title is ok bt it is dittoo from passage would it b acceptable?????

[QUOTE=cateyes;274385]my title was ....

[COLOR="Sienna"]The psychological causes of unhappiness[/COLOR]

well i m confused though title is ok bt it is dittoo from passage would it b acceptable?????[/QUOTE]

No worries.It seems absolutely ok:)

tell me abt my title ...

2nd thing is that
conquest of happiness id title of book and book is discourse of multitude of different themes
so author wote having perception of that themes

q no 3 has come from alduous huxley
his essay name is "knowledge and understandg

[QUOTE=sibgakhan;272272]Q.6 (a).Correct the incorrect.

My try goes here.

1. Please speak to the concerned clerk.
Please speak the concerned clerk.

2. They have got time too short for that.
They have got too short time for that.

3. Not only he was a thief, but he was also a murderer.
He was not only a thief but also a murdered.

4. They thought that the plan would be succeed.
They thought that the plan would succeed.

5. It is unlikely that he wins the race.
It is unlikely he wins the race.

6. My uncle has told me something about it yesterday.
My uncle told me about it yesterday.

7. They prevented the driver to stop.
They prevented the driver from stopping. :)

Please Correct me.[/QUOTE]
[B][I][CENTER]
My assessment[/CENTER][/I][/B]

[B][I]1 Plz see the concerned cleric.
3 Not only he was a thief, but also a murderer.
4 They thought that the plan would be successful.
5 He is unlikely to win the race.
6 Correct
7 They made the driver to stop[/I][/B]

it will be

please speak to the clerk

coz the is a definite article and "the" is for one is specified for that task

when that is used it means it is in past so replace that with this or changed the tense form

also and only are substitute for each other so ...

HE was not only a thief but a murderer

can any one tell about the word 'MENAGE" AS IT IS NOT HOUSEHOLD

[QUOTE=SADIA SHAFIQ;274826]it will be

please speak to the clerk

coz the is a definite article and "the" is for one is specified for that task

when that is used it means it is in past so replace that with this or changed the tense form

also and only are substitute for each other so ...

HE was not only a thief but a murderer

can any one tell about the word 'MENAGE" AS IT IS NOT HOUSEHOLD[/QUOTE]

your explanation is totally wrong..
I've been doing this "not only..but also" rule since class 6th! they'r used together..

and speak is more formal when you don't know your subject personally and talk is when you know who your talking to.. since i'm not really good in explaining i'll paste the examples i digged out from google to make it easy on your head!..

[COLOR="Navy"]"Both obviously relate to the business of communication. Broadly speak has to do with the use of oral language and talk has to do with oral language in relation to one or other person - even to oneslf.

You can speak a foreign language, speak to a group of people, speak the truth.

You can talk to another person/other people in the sense of having a conversation, you can talk about a subject in the sense of having a view about something.

The two nouns give a sharper defintion - speech (speak) and talk.
A talk gives the idea of an informal discourse a speech describes a formal occasion as in a debate.

Imagine a situation when someone is giving a speech to an audience and in that audience two children are having a conversation, not listening to the speech and irritating the rest of the audience. This is how you would describe that:

While the minister was speaking at the meeting, two children were told to be quiet because they were talking to one another and making it difficult for people to concentrate."[/COLOR]

[COLOR="DarkGreen"]"The Rule: In the not only . . . but also construction, the two items connected must be similar in kind.

So:

Wrong: He not only painted the "Annunciation" but also [painted] the "Mona Lisa."
Right: He painted not only the "Annunciation" but also the "Mona lisa"[/COLOR]

So in the not only wala question there's a placement mistake and in the clerk wala question there "speak" would be replaced with "talk"

Hope it helps =)