CSS Forums

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)
-   CSS 2012 Papers (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-papers-1971-2015/css-2012-papers/)
-   -   constitutional law-2012 (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-papers-1971-2015/css-2012-papers/61279-constitutional-law-2012-a.html)

most wanted Sunday, March 11, 2012 11:44 PM

constitutional law-2012
 
[SIZE="3"]constitutional law-2012:

2. Highlight the purpose of constitution and the principle of constitutionalism. Elaborate various characteristics which could be used to identify the nature of a constitution.

3. What do you understand by the doctrine of "Parliamentary Sovereignty" or the traditional view of legislative supremacy? What is the role of rival law makers in a hierarchy of laws?

4. How would you compare the powers of American President with those of British Prime Minister? Give an analytical account.

5. The insertion of word "Secular" in the preamble of constitution of India has been productive of more mischief than benefit. Comment on the opinion of an academician.

6. Discuss in detail the relation between parliament and the government in France.

7. In what matters the Supreme Court of Pakistan exercise Original jurisdiction? Illustrate by quoting the facts, decision and reasons of a decided case.

8. Which public office holders in Pakistan enjoy constitutional protection from proceedings against them? Explain the nature and extent of such protection.[/SIZE]

[CENTER]*********[/CENTER]

Gulrukh Monday, March 12, 2012 11:45 AM

plz post the objective part as well.

thanx.

qamar abbas ranjha Monday, March 12, 2012 01:10 PM

plz don't add salt to our injury by asking about objective of c law.It was tooooo tough.It seems that paper of c law was set by prof Dicy and he put all his concerted effort to confuse us ,surprise us both in objective as well as in subjective paper.It was not already a scoring subject and tough paper of this year impels us to keep away from this obnoxious subject.By the way they took back objective part....

Suman Thursday, March 15, 2012 06:17 AM

[QUOTE=qamar abbas ranjha;412755]plz don't add salt to our injury by asking about objective of c law.It was tooooo tough.It seems that paper of c law was set by prof Dicy and he put all his concerted effort to confuse us ,surprise us both in objective as well as in subjective paper.It was not already a scoring subject and tough paper of this year impels us to keep away from this obnoxious subject.By the way they took back objective part....[/QUOTE]

Agreed.this year paper seems to be very tough and questions pattern is also different from previous year papers.I hope you people may get good score this time though it is all time low scoring subject.but i don't understand why they took back objective part?? the reason seems that they are going to follow this year's pattern in upcoming papers also so want to keep aspirants in dark.so its better for future aspirants not to opt this subject.

qamar abbas ranjha Monday, March 19, 2012 01:49 PM

[QUOTE=suman;413609]Agreed.this year paper seems to be very tough and questions pattern is also different from previous year papers.I hope you people may get good score this time though it is all time low scoring subject.but i don't understand why they took back objective part?? the reason seems that they are going to follow this year's pattern in upcoming papers also so want to keep aspirants in dark.so its better for future aspirants not to opt this subject.[/QUOTE]

May be by taking back objective paper,they want to finance the FPSC through selling this stuff..If so ,they should also make arrangement to collect subjective too.:laughing...It fact,when paper setting directions go to paper setters,past paper is also attached with them yet it is not mandatory for paper setter to follow past trends.That s why we find less or more deviation from past trends.


03:56 PM (GMT +5)

vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.