examiner knew well the title and book.anybody reproduced the author's title,will not be awarded.↲he wana to see ur reasoning not the manipulation.↲However↲↲q num 2 ansz summary,↲KnOWLEDGE have diachoronicle approach and understanding synchronicle.knowledge have is whole and under standing part of it.↲↲perception is person acquisition of knowledge and these perceptiön can b made diachronicle.↲Media..books.manuscripts.↲↲Hamlet is the knowledge of understanding of shakespeare.↲Bale jibrael of iqbal.↲And that of ALLAH is creation.0man ,women,animals.↲holy books.↲Allah's perception perfect while man has weakness.↲My title was,↲SOCIAL MOBILITY CREATES MORAL DEPRIVITY

Paper is very simple, it opens opportunity for candidates to get good marks in this paper. Those who studied under my guidance, must be happy, I wish all of them best of luck and pray for all candidates to accomplish their desire objectives.

my title was ....


[COLOR="Sienna"]The psychological causes of unhappiness[/COLOR]


well i m confused though title is ok bt it is dittoo from passage would it b acceptable?????

[QUOTE=cateyes;274385]my title was ....


[COLOR="Sienna"]The psychological causes of unhappiness[/COLOR]


well i m confused though title is ok bt it is dittoo from passage would it b acceptable?????[/QUOTE]

No worries.It seems absolutely ok:)

tell me abt my title ...

2nd thing is that
conquest of happiness id title of book and book is discourse of multitude of different themes
so author wote having perception of that themes

q no 3 has come from alduous huxley
his essay name is "knowledge and understandg

[QUOTE=sibgakhan;272272]Q.6 (a).Correct the incorrect.

My try goes here.

1. Please speak to the concerned clerk.
Please speak the concerned clerk.

2. They have got time too short for that.
They have got too short time for that.

3. Not only he was a thief, but he was also a murderer.
He was not only a thief but also a murdered.

4. They thought that the plan would be succeed.
They thought that the plan would succeed.

5. It is unlikely that he wins the race.
It is unlikely he wins the race.

6. My uncle has told me something about it yesterday.
My uncle told me about it yesterday.

7. They prevented the driver to stop.
They prevented the driver from stopping. :)

Please Correct me.[/QUOTE]
[B][I][CENTER]
My assessment[/CENTER][/I][/B]

[B][I]1 Plz see the concerned cleric.
3 Not only he was a thief, but also a murderer.
4 They thought that the plan would be successful.
5 He is unlikely to win the race.
6 Correct
7 They made the driver to stop[/I][/B]

it will be

please speak to the clerk

coz the is a definite article and "the" is for one is specified for that task

when that is used it means it is in past so replace that with this or changed the tense form

also and only are substitute for each other so ...

HE was not only a thief but a murderer

can any one tell about the word 'MENAGE" AS IT IS NOT HOUSEHOLD

[QUOTE=SADIA SHAFIQ;274826]it will be

please speak to the clerk

coz the is a definite article and "the" is for one is specified for that task

when that is used it means it is in past so replace that with this or changed the tense form

also and only are substitute for each other so ...

HE was not only a thief but a murderer

can any one tell about the word 'MENAGE" AS IT IS NOT HOUSEHOLD[/QUOTE]
Menage does mean household.
It is a french word and since i speak french i know i'm right.
Ever heard of the phrase 'menage-e-trois' ?

[QUOTE=SADIA SHAFIQ;274826]it will be

please speak to the clerk

coz the is a definite article and "the" is for one is specified for that task

when that is used it means it is in past so replace that with this or changed the tense form

also and only are substitute for each other so ...

HE was not only a thief but a murderer

can any one tell about the word 'MENAGE" AS IT IS NOT HOUSEHOLD[/QUOTE]



your explanation is totally wrong..
I've been doing this "not only..but also" rule since class 6th! they'r used together..

and speak is more formal when you don't know your subject personally and talk is when you know who your talking to.. since i'm not really good in explaining i'll paste the examples i digged out from google to make it easy on your head!..

[COLOR="Navy"]"Both obviously relate to the business of communication. Broadly speak has to do with the use of oral language and talk has to do with oral language in relation to one or other person - even to oneslf.

You can speak a foreign language, speak to a group of people, speak the truth.

You can talk to another person/other people in the sense of having a conversation, you can talk about a subject in the sense of having a view about something.

The two nouns give a sharper defintion - speech (speak) and talk.
A talk gives the idea of an informal discourse a speech describes a formal occasion as in a debate.

Imagine a situation when someone is giving a speech to an audience and in that audience two children are having a conversation, not listening to the speech and irritating the rest of the audience. This is how you would describe that:

While the minister was speaking at the meeting, two children were told to be quiet because they were talking to one another and making it difficult for people to concentrate."[/COLOR]

[COLOR="DarkGreen"]"The Rule: In the not only . . . but also construction, the two items connected must be similar in kind.

So:

Wrong: He not only painted the "Annunciation" but also [painted] the "Mona Lisa."
Right: He painted not only the "Annunciation" but also the "Mona lisa"[/COLOR]


So in the not only wala question there's a placement mistake and in the clerk wala question there "speak" would be replaced with "talk"

Hope it helps =)

sadia
the correct option of 6 is'nt c it's b i.e of sons and daughters consult the following link to confirm
[url=http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/filial]filial - Wiktionary[/url]

than it will be

say it to the clerk concerned will also ommitted


and talk ' NEVER SEEN in verbal language but say and asked are used

but agreed with tour correction of speek

Tthan it will be

say it to the clerk concerned will also omitted


and talk ' NEVER SEEN in verbal language but say and asked are used

but agreed with tour correction of spea[/QUOTE]

huh? there's a world's difference between written and spoken (if that's what you mean by "verbal") english and life is easy don't make it complicated hun..it's a simple statement..it has a simple solution, don't confuse urself and others.

stay blessed!

[QUOTE=cateyes;274385]my title was ....


[COLOR="Sienna"]The psychological causes of unhappiness[/COLOR]


well i m confused though title is ok bt it is dittoo from passage would it b acceptable?????[/QUOTE]

Hmmmm[B][I] cateyes[/I][/B] that was exactly right because it is taken from Conquest of Happiness and under this title.

Precis
 

'an unhappy man' would have been very good title for you guys. Is there any one who gave this title?

[QUOTE=janojannan;275528]Hmmmm[B][I] cateyes[/I][/B] that was exactly right because it is taken from Conquest of Happiness and under this title.[/QUOTE]
ohhhh thxxx chaloo kuch to theek hua jo ma paper ma likh k aye hun :evil

my try was as follows:
3) Not only was he a thief but also a murderer
4) They thought the plan would succeed, (or) they thought the plan would be successful
5) It is unlikely that he will win the race
6) My uncle had told me something about it yesterday
8) They forced the driver to stop (or) they prevented the driver from stopping

The sentences could be corrected in many ways. in the two i corrected it in two ways

my title of precis
 

war between between happiness and unhappiness
but i think it was wrong.
it seems to be perfect
[B]psychological causes of unhappiness is right[/B]

plz comment on my title

'' Rationalization of Sadness''... is the better title to be given.:pipe:wacko::angry::tata

hoe it is appropriate...you are saying abt melnchly.......

is it??but its abt sadness not happiness

my title of precis
 

what u people think about my title.guys i m a little bit confused

[QUOTE=The Manager;276852]'' Rationalization of Sadness''... is the better title to be given.:pipe:wacko::angry::tata[/QUOTE]

For me it is Good one.
All the best.

@Ali Raza Psychological causes of unhappiness,it is good,don't worry.

ALL IS WELL..now all of u shud be relax..start preparing for interview right now

[QUOTE=KanVwal Ayub;271633][COLOR="Navy"][SIZE="4"][FONT="Palatino Linotype"]Hmmm can any1 tell me the meaning of
*A sugar daddy
*the gordian knot

I did both of them with TUKKA =D[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/QUOTE]




A sugar daddy: A elderly person who seduces youngsters through offering them precious things.
A Gordian knot: Something difficult.

Precis and composition was my best paper.
Mcqs 9 correct (10 hotay if i would've chosen most opposite meaning instead of choosing most similar in second question :dd:dd)
idioms all correct.
4 pairs of words correct.
precis and comprehension bhi mazay ki hui hai. :dd:dd

dekhtay hain kitnay marks miltay hain

precise title
 

interesting discussion on precise ------those who are getting worry - no need to worry all of u
ppr examiner wil hav his/her own perception
i opted pshycology so wen i saw precise few line i got relaxed as i wil b able to do it , aft 2 hour i left only with precise
i didnt knew about this passge from where it was taken
but after reading in twice i decided to giv
phsycological cuases of unhappines ( tis title also given some member here as well)
i had one hour so i did precise with full chill i gues for those who who havnt idea of pshyce may b tyt wud b difficult for those
otherwise it was general not too much technical

salam guys,well my papers went bad i am realy worried,it seems that everything went wrong,i got a problem due to which my paper went bad but still i believe in almighty and hope for the best.plz pray for me:sad::sad::sad:

title was....
 

i gave the following title, plz comment
[B][B][I][U][COLOR="DarkRed"]
understanding the psychology of unhappiness[/COLOR][/U][/I][/B][/B]

pair of words
 

last year i got 4 POW correct n i got 64, but this year i got only 1 correct... wut should i expect now???? :mad:

[SIZE="3"]here goes mine:

Precis Title:
[B][COLOR="Blue"]"Misguided unhappy man and his miserable beliefs".[/COLOR][/B][/SIZE]

Can anyone tell me that If one makes sentence of only one word from pair of words,would he be given marks of that one word?

[QUOTE=Farrah Zafar;278196]Can anyone tell me that If one makes sentence of only one word from pair of words,would he be given marks of that one word?[/QUOTE]
no it wud not b rewarded. bcoz it is not a vocabulary test and its usage.rather it is a test of making difference between two similar words.

[QUOTE=fromQAU;278214]no it wud not b rewarded. bcoz it is not a vocabulary test and its usage.rather it is a test of making difference between two similar words.[/QUOTE]

ab kia ho ga?:(:cry:sad:

[QUOTE=Farrah Zafar;278216]ab kia ho ga?:(:cry:sad:[/QUOTE]
wohi hoga jesa aap ne likha hoga !!!

no reward in case of sentence of one word.fromqua is right.
ho ga ab ye k jo nahi likha wo to gya baki ki fikr ki jiye
or dua kro shaed examiner ki shatir nazaro se buch jaye


@ from qua
bi sb ap yahoo use bhi krte he ya nahi

[QUOTE=DEADLYDOCTOR;278219]no reward in case of sentence of one word.fromqua is right.
ho ga ab ye k jo nahi likha wo to gya baki ki fikr ki jiye
or dua kro shaed examiner ki shatir nazaro se buch jaye


@ from qua
bi sb ap yahoo use bhi krte he ya nahi[/QUOTE]



[SIZE="3"]hahahahha DD unki shatir nazron se aaj tak koi bacha he???? wo to theek chezon ko b ghalat kar dete hen.

yar due to viruses yahoo messenger is not working properly at the moment. i wl reinstall windows tonight so i hope that we wl b able to contact aaj night or tomorrow.[/SIZE]

is liye sub se mujarrub nuskha tajveez kiya he ---DUA
anyways they have no criteria and this is the only criteria they follow:dd

[SIZE="3"]yar ye sirf hamari soch hoti he k hum unko ditch kar sakte hen ya unko bewaqoof bana sakte hen. mere khayal men wo itne expert hote hen k wo samajh jate hongay k ab ye candidate is jaga pe phans rha he aur ye struggle kar rha he. itz my opinion.[/SIZE]