Indo-Pak History Papers 2014
 

Q2 .How did Ghayasuddin balban consolidate his rule ?What were his major achievements as a ruler?

Q3. Give an account of market regulations and price control system of Allaudin Khilji?

Q4. Make a comparison between the teachngs, Khanqah organization and attitude towards the state of sufi saints of Chistiya and suharwardi orders or silsilahs of sufism in India?

Q5. Why Sher shah suri is called forerunner of Akbar? which policies and measures of sher shah suri were adapted by Akbar?

Q6. How would you evaluate Aurangzeb as a ruler? Discuss in lenght his successes and failures to supprt your view point?

Q7. Discuss in detail the society and culture during the Sultanate period.

Q8. Write a comprehensive note on the art , architecture and literature of Mughal era, mentioning all the important architectural monuments and literary works produced during the period. blink:wait:tata

[CENTER][B]Paper - II [/B]

[B]Part II[/B]

[/CENTER]
Question 2: How the British East India Company emerged as a Political force from a trading firm?

Question 3: "No Aligarh movement - No independence - No Pakistan" give arguments in favor or against the common belief.

Question 4: Critically examine the role of Muslim religious parties toward making of Pakistan.

Question 5: Carefully examine the Post-World War II political development of India towards the division of India and to keep it united in context with the British Government, the congress and the Muslim league.

Question 6: Elucidate the reasons of constitutional crises in Pakistan after its inception. Also examine the role of civil-military stake-holders in lingering the constitution making process during the first decade of political history of Pakistan.

Question 7: Discuss in detail various regional separatist movements which developed in Pakistan with a special reference to the mishandling of the Balochistan case. In you opinion what is the solution of the current crises of our country.

Question 8: Examine the sectarian crises in Pakistan with a special concern to the Madrassa element tracing the history of Muslim educational system since the rise of Muslim power in South Asia; keeping into account the merits and the demerits of the whole system.

MCQs
 

Indo-Pak History Paper 2 CE-2014

How many care taker government from 1988-99........ 5 :(
Who was viceroy during second afghan war...... Lord Lytton:(
When did Pakistan leave SEATO..... I wrote 14 Nov, 1973, dont know the answer
When was Nawab Waqar-ul-Mulk made secretary of Aligarh.... 1907
Dawn newspaper was started in......1942 :(
Land for Nawatul Ulama was given by.... Dont know the answer
IJI contained how many parties..... 9 :(
Tashkent declaration.....10th Jan, 1966
First Education mister of Pakistan... Fazlur Rehman :(
First Viceroy of India....Lord Canning
Which post was given to Gurmani in 1949?
Ehtsab Ordinace 1996 given in...... Nov,1996 :(
Musharaf made Army Chief....7 Oct, 1998
Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians was formed in ...2002
Number of Ministeries from 1956 to 1958.....3
Number of election from 1985-1999..... 5

Baqi Shayad mere theak the isliye yad nahin.

mcq's paper 2
 

1)akbar born at.2)capital of sind when qasim invaded.3)divisions of land by akbar.4)who was great political economist of delhi sultanate 5)humayun fled to-persia 6)shah of khawarzim sought refige from-iltutmish 7)why MBD shifted his capital 8)rani padmavati 9)amir khusrau 10)real motive of akbar to introduce religious innovations 11)badshahi mosque built during the reign of 12)jehangir was renowned due to-his justice.13)who was mixture of two extremes 14)the forty" was constituted by.15)highest title holder of delhi sultanate was called -amir/malik.

Question 3: "No Aligarh movement - No independence - No Pakistan" give arguments in [B]favor [/B]or against the common belief. :happy: What a question! Mazedar question hay.....:)


1-No Aligarh Movement-Means Muslims are still under the rule of British governemnt and Hindus...

2-No Independence- Without Aligar movement it is not impossible:onesec

3-No Pakistan- If no Pakistan, then Hindus would have been our masters :dd

Conclusion- Muslims would have been in dark ages under the rule of Hindus after WWII....

:)

[QUOTE=exclusively;701488]Question 3: "No Aligarh movement - No independence - No Pakistan" give arguments in [B]favor [/B]or against the common belief. :happy: What a question! Mazedar question hay.....:)


1-No Aligarh Movement-Muslims mostly illiterate, they might be supressed by both Hindus And the Britishers more harshly as a consequence could never inducted in some high profile jobs like ICS.

2-No Independence- Education is the backbone for self awareness if a nation is illiterate in the sense even it could not recognize the rights, so how can they flourish politically. Aligarh proved to be the main Hub of the muslim's unity, where they got agreed with the idea that neither Hindus nor the Britishers are interested in the betterment of muslims. This arose a sense of unity among themselves.

3-No Pakistan- Infact Sir Syed is considered as the father of two nation theory, as he clearly mentioned in his Journels that Muslims and Hindus are two entirely different religion having nothing in common right after the dispute of Urdu-Hindi Language. Aligarh was infact the base above which the massive construction of Pakistan was built of in the coming years of 20th century. Muslims awoken politically by self reliance after the education movement.

Conclusion- So for Pakistan Aligarh movement of Sir Syed is exactly alike the visionary innings played by Hafeez in the Asia Cup against the India, finally blitz of by Afridi (like Quaid e azam).:thinking

[QUOTE=amnakhan;701908][QUOTE=exclusively;701488]Question 3: "No Aligarh movement - No independence - No Pakistan" give arguments in [B]favor [/B]or against the common belief. :happy: What a question! Mazedar question hay.....:)


1-No Aligarh Movement-Muslims mostly illiterate, they might be supressed by both Hindus And the Britishers more harshly as a consequence could never inducted in some high profile jobs like ICS.

2-No Independence- Education is the backbone for self awareness if a nation is illiterate in the sense even it could not recognize the rights, so how can they flourish politically. Aligarh proved to be the main Hub of the muslim's unity, where they got agreed with the idea that neither Hindus nor the Britishers are interested in the betterment of muslims. This arose a sense of unity among themselves.

3-No Pakistan- Infact Sir Syed is considered as the father of two nation theory, as he clearly mentioned in his Journels that Muslims and Hindus are two entirely different religion having nothing in common right after the dispute of Urdu-Hindi Language. Aligarh was infact the base above which the massive construction of Pakistan was built of in the coming years of 20th century. Muslims awoken politically by self reliance after the education movement.

Conclusion- So for Pakistan Aligarh movement of Sir Syed is exactly alike the visionary innings played by Hafeez in the Asia Cup against the India, finally blitz of by Afridi (like Quaid e azam).:thinking[/QUOTE]
paper 2 was halwa :)

@isha saeed
 

indo-pak history paper-II

I do not agree with you that it was a halwa paper. i think it was difficult from paper-I.Mcq's were quite typical requiring exact dates instead of month or year.So was the subjective portion.It demanded analytical approach with improvised answers,further contained some questions from current affairs approach.All these factors will probably contribute to low score.