Plzzzz somebody answer me.. I can't study for my next paper... Due to this tension...

[QUOTE=The arrogant;806185]Plzzzz somebody answer me.. I can't study for my next paper... Due to this tension...[/QUOTE]

You need aggregate 66 marks to pass a 200 Marks Paper.

Stay focused for next paper!

Piaget theory, erikson theory, vygotskey theory were simple straight forward questions. Personaality was a bit technical question but still aspirants could done half of it about personality testing techniques and personality research methods.
It was an easy paper for those who studied from one authentic book atleast and didn't depend only on cram series or acadmy notes.

Sent from my Nokia_XL

Paper II was surely meant for psychologists. It required in-depth knowledge of the subject and for already exhausted aspirants,it was nearly impossible to digest such heavy questions.

[QUOTE=sikander kalhoro;806262]Who is Vygotsky ? [/QUOTE]
Firstly some manners please!
Secondly although detail na sae but it was mention in psychology exam cram series book as well. And yes its very famous theory of Social learning in current psychology studies.

Psychology syllabus include henry murrey personality theory and lewin motivation theory but normal available books m in k detail ni mlti.

I am just of view that authentic books should be consult for exam prep.

Sent from my Nokia_XL

[QUOTE=sikander kalhoro;806262]Who is Vygotsky ? [/QUOTE]

Have a look on themes and variations psychology book 7th edition just below the piaget's cognative development theory is about vygotsy and before piaget's theory is erkinson's theory.

[QUOTE=sabeera;806310]Firstly some manners please!
Secondly although detail na sae but it was mention in psychology exam cram series book as well. And yes its very famous theory of Social learning in current psychology studies.

Psychology syllabus include henry murrey personality theory and lewin motivation theory but normal available books m in k detail ni mlti.

I am just of view that authentic books should be consult for exam prep.

Sent from my Nokia_XL[/QUOTE]

If he had been much famous, his theory would have been known to many

[QUOTE=sikander kalhoro;806375]If he had been much famous, his theory would have been known to many[/QUOTE]

its there in Fieldman too, and quite in detail.

[QUOTE=sikander kalhoro;806375]If he had been much famous, his theory would have been known to many[/QUOTE]

Firstly, the question does not asks for the exposition of the theory itself. It asks to link the zone of proximal development to the basic notion of the theory.

Secondly, university level courses pertaining to social psychology do include Vygotsky's socio cultural approach. This question was halwa for those aspirants who had previously studied social psychology at university level. I only studied handful of psychology courses at university and even I could recall it easily.

Thirdly, just because one does not possess enough knowledge on a particular theory does not imply that the theory is 'unknown'. Google the title and search scholarly articles on the theory and you will understand what I mean.

[QUOTE=Eager;806396]its there in Fieldman too, and quite in detail.[/QUOTE]

but it wasn't mentioned in Hilgard's book. Hilgard's book is one of the most recommended with detailed topics, illustrations, and diagrams. I prepared from this book which thrived me in paper-I