What about 2014?? Did you not see that?

Sent from my QMobile S2 using Tapatalk

[IMG]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160220/28dae230541378f36875817c6d0aef9c.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my SM-G530H using Tapatalk

[QUOTE=Nazish Hina;913641]What about 2014?? Did you not see that?

Sent from my QMobile S2 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
Nazish ,read carefully,I had mentioned that India is all seasoned largest exporter in the world,do you know how much cost a single nuclear reactor consumes.Ksa bechare k pass kon se reactors Han.Even in 2013- 2014.
I think there must be truce.(50/50)

[QUOTE=ursula;913647]Nazish ,read carefully,I had mentioned that India is all seasoned largest exporter in the world,do you know how much cost a single nuclear reactor consumes.Ksa bechare k pass kon se reactors Han.Even in 2013- 2014.
I think there must be truce.(50/50)[/QUOTE]
Nope..

[url]http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/09/saudi-arabia-becomes-worlds-biggest-arms-importer[/url]

Without reactors

[QUOTE=Nazish Hina;913641]What about 2014?? Did you not see that?

Sent from my QMobile S2 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
Are you getting bit egoistic,
Stock holm report of peace studies is providing you very authentic information and you know that was their official report.But any way,I'm getting enough of this

[QUOTE=ursula;913652]Are you getting bit egoistic,
Stock holm report of peace studies is providing you very authentic information and you know that was their official report.But any way,I'm getting enough of this.[/QUOTE]
No, no!
It was a genuine question . sorry for offending you

[QUOTE=Nazish Hina;913641]What about 2014?? Did you not see that?

Sent from my QMobile S2 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]

Although, i selected India, it think its a tricky question with emphasis being on 2014 especially. If the checker had wanted us to mark India, it would have been a general question, and he wouldn't have specified 2014. He wanted to see who knows about Saudi Arabian spike in imports in 2014. Its common sense to see that he didn't say who is the largest arms importer in 2015, so there must be some reason behind it. So, i believe your answer is correct.

[QUOTE=fawadhash;913839]Its common sense to see that he didn't say who is the[B] largest arms importer in 2015[/B], so there must be some reason behind it. So, i believe your answer is correct.[/QUOTE]
Just a good example to tell you my critical analysis(and I hope that you won't be as egoistic as others are here on this forum)
Overall ,from 2003 to [B]onward[/B] India [B]was,is and will[/B] be the largest importer of weapon.Only in June 2015 to August 2015 KSA's imports super ceded.India's total import of weapons account for [B]15% of the [B]world[/B],while that of KSA is just 5%.source Stockholm institute of research and peace.[/B]

@Nazish Hina
This is the reason why I'm saying you k my dear beloved sister mention any information but with authentic source.I hope you will have consider my request.:))

[QUOTE=ursula;913852]Just a good example to tell you my critical analysis(and I hope that you won't be as egoistic as others are here on this forum)
Overall ,from 2003 to [B]onward[/B] India [B]was,is and will[/B] be the largest importer of weapon.Only in June 2015 to August 2015 KSA's imports super ceded.India's total import of weapons account for [B]15% of the [B]world[/B],while that of KSA is just 5%.source Stockholm institute of research and peace.[/B][/QUOTE]


I wont be egoistic because its in my interest if your answer is correct.

[QUOTE=zealot;913323][LIST][*]at political level
1nacta had been been made more effective after recent attack on bacha khan university to monitor terrorist threats by gathering analysing and then coordinating with police and paramilitary forces all the intelligence based info with government to make immediate quick and decisive action
But still flaws are present in working of Nacta as recent objection raised by army on goverence performance by ISPR.as police force who work in collaboration with nacta is politicized.for example in Karachi
2 seminaries faced restrictions.members of different seminaries are arrested and some were detained.
This issue can be deal by having complete record of every seminary in each city and then a special cell is required to be made to control maintain the working of seminaries.according to" hive" the NGO..there are 3.5 million children in about 35000 seminaries.but auqaf authorizes mentioned record of about 23000 children.at the same time government need proper scholars to be introduced and molvis should be trained by giving former the employment and later the sense
3 Karachi operation gained commendable successes by flushing out all terrorist networks thereby giving a warning shot across the bow to the accomplices to comport in acceptable manner by setting examples of Dr asim and senior MQM leaders detentions.but yet created issues to limit powers of rangers.
What is required now to develop consensus regarding the future foray of rangers in Karachi by taking every political party on board
4 according Nap no terrorist organization which is banned is allowed to work under different name and the airing of speech of any such organization is banned. But JuD is doing reverse
5 the cross border terrorism lay question mark regarding operation Zarb e Azb as current attacks on university claimed by mullah fazalluah in Afghanistan having his sympathizers in Pakistan having NADRA issued Pakistan identity illegaly can make situation worst[*]AT MILITARY LEVEL
Pakistan has right of hot pursuit to hunt mullah in Afghanistan either through covert operation or through pak made drone strike as it is an international law.
Further institutions like NADRA needed to be dealt with strictly who are issuing illegally the citizenship to Afghanis Indians and iranis.also Afghanistan needed to be taken on board to perform such operation as General Raheel Sharif already told Afghanistan for hot pursuit.
[/LIST][/QUOTE]
Nice attempt.
Is this your complete answer, you wrote in answer sheet? Or these are the main points only?