Thursday, March 28, 2024
10:20 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, May 21, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 57
Thanks: 9
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
ahmed8ty9 is on a distinguished road
Default CSS Decline - Article share your opinions

Assalamo Alaikum respected members

Please share your opinions


THE fact that out of 9,643 applicants only 202 passed the Central Superior Services exam this year has led to headlines like ‘Decline of CSS’. While the reasons for this decline are many, this year’s result does not stem from them. The actual reason is the change in the system of examination introduced by the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC).

In 2016, the FPSC, on the basis of a number of studies, changed the rules of the exam. It had been following trends where engineers would opt for high-scoring maths and score solid marks, which was not possible for even brilliant students of other, less-scoring subjects. This specialised subject approach was adopted in other areas also, putting the majority of students at an unfair disadvantage.

Since the concept of the CSS exam is based on looking for generalists with a proven level of intellect, the FPSC has come up with six different groups of subjects, including economics and accounting, pure sciences/maths, business/public administration, history, environment/earth sciences and law. It has made it obligatory for applicants to choose practically one subject from each group to ensure a level playing field.

Bashing civil servants is a favourite pastime.
In the good old days of our vintage, there were no multiple choice questions and taking an exam was an art unto itself. Students of English literature and those who had better writing skills had a distinct advantage. Then some decades later, we saw a preponderance of engineers and doctors as entrants. So until the FPSC finds some other aberration, the new rules are meant to fix that flaw.

Any new system takes time to be mastered. Since failing even one subject eliminates a candidate’s chances altogether, the pass percentage has nosedived, as the majority have struggled with elective subjects they have little expertise in.

Some more context is required. Constitutionally, there are three pillars of the state — the executive, judiciary and parliament. Over the years, three more pillars have cropped up — the military, the media and the mullah. Each defends its turf jealously. Take the military and the judiciary. There is only internal accountability. The media and the public are generally careful when it comes to criticising them. Beyond a certain point, the institutions step in to defend their respective members.

Similarly, criticism of or allegations against a parliamentarian is refuted promptly through the media to which he/she has ready access. He/she may also use the floor of the house to use the choicest invective for his/her critic. And, you criticise the mullah at your own physical peril.

Meanwhile, criticise a media person and he/she will ensure that all your blunders, imaginary or real, are brought to everyone’s attention and that you are forced to go into full-time media management to save your honour. If that option is not available, his/her union, channel or colleagues come to the rescue.

It is only the bureaucrats who are not defended by any one, not even by their own colleagues. Going to the media is against the rules and ‘arranging’ a bureaucrat’s defence through the media is difficult as civil servants don’t have informal access. Officer associations are tame, due to years of servile training; they protest through the ‘proper channels’ only.

Bureaucracy-bashing continues to be the favourite pastime of the judiciary, the media, and the politicians. Bureaucrats are used as examples of unbridled power, inefficiency and corruption, traits which are not exclusive to them.

When earnest young men and women entering the CSS see posts being given on political recommendations rather than on merit, when they understand that loyalty to the politician in power earns a bureaucrat choice assignments, when the corrupt in their ranks prosper, all idealism goes out of the window.

Those who refrain from falling in line or get themselves posted to some affiliate organisation, away from the mainstream, or just learn to pass time, becoming negative and obstructionist in the process.

When the bureaucracy is not given due respect by the powers that be and the pillars of the state, the public follows suit and you have a system where everyone takes it for granted. Resultantly, it cannot enforce its writ.

Even young, idealistic CSS entrants get no support or guidance from their seniors, who are themselves insecure. The federal establishment secretary and the provincial chief secretaries, at one time the source of ultimate power for the civil servant, are unable to secure themselves and have become post offices.

Can you even imagine a Pakistani army chief waiting for hours outside the prime minister’s office to take orders or get approval of the postings of his corps commanders, or to protest against the posting of a brigadier behind his back? Well this is what happens all the time when it comes to bureaucrats including senior ones. And civil servants are still expected to be decisive and efficient, and to deliver.

The writer is a former civil servant.

Published in Dawn, May 21st, 2017



https://www.dawn.com/news/1334433/css-decline


some interesting comments:

Quote:
Its a reflection of the deterioration in every sector that our society is undergoing . The reason besides the falling education standards is indiscipline and the ambition to get rich. As far as doctors and engineers appearing in the CSS, it is a disturbing , has anyone taken the trouble to ascertain the reasons? An analysis be made to ascertain the breakup of the 199 successful candidates, how many of them attended public /private school, how many appeared for 'O' & 'A' and the major city wise breakup. This will help in taking corrective measures.

Bashing the bureaucrats as pastime, is an opportunity they themselves provide. The civil/military bureaucracy which is the strongest class has been ruling the country for the major part. They use the politicians for their vested interest like getting plots in the most posh areas , get prized and choicest postings/promotions , enjoy perks and privileges that a common man cannot even imagine.

Quote:
The author is trying to hopelessly defend a flawed system and worse still trying to paint it in civilian vs military colours. The CSS system might have been the nation's pride at some point, but in today's iteration it is hopelessly outdated, abhors innovation and subject to the whims of bumbling politicians or military officials - even if Pakistan's brilliant minds do clear the CSS and get into the civil service, it will be a waste of their time and talent and will stifle them intellectually.

The private sector is far more rewarding, financially, personally and developmentally. I've personally noted that these days most people applying for CSS are the type who want a cush job for doing minimal work - no wonder the standards have went down.

Quote:
I often wonder why there's so much hype around these individuals who pass out this exams! Look at the state/condition of institutions allocated to them namely Police, OMG, Railways, FBR or any others and you'll find all these departments have deteriorated over the years. We might find few people working to their best but most of them throw in the towel in face of pressures form their departmental or political bosses. They are often interested in a lucrative postings and can lick boots of anyone for that purpose.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ahmed8ty9 For This Useful Post:
mrarsalankhan (Sunday, May 28, 2017)
  #2  
Old Sunday, May 28, 2017
quantumX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Lahore
Posts: 288
Thanks: 142
Thanked 168 Times in 124 Posts
quantumX is on a distinguished road
Default

I second what has been said.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to quantumX For This Useful Post:
mrarsalankhan (Sunday, May 28, 2017)
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Constitution of the United States Muhammad Adnan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 3 Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM
International relation notes. Zohaib786 International Relations 0 Friday, September 30, 2011 07:32 PM
Need help: Constitution's questions rqabutt Constitutional Law 11 Monday, February 07, 2011 11:06 PM
18th amendment; Notes moss4u Current Affairs Notes 2 Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:40 AM
Amnesty International free thinker General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 4 Wednesday, April 26, 2006 12:27 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.