Saturday, April 20, 2024
02:53 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Monday, March 06, 2006
Yasir Hayat Khan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nowshera, KPK
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Yasir Hayat Khan is on a distinguished road
Arrow President Bush’s odyssey

For India awards, for Afghanistan applause, and for Pakistan pious vows, if not expectations; how else can you truthfully describe President Bush’s just-concluded journeys to these three nations? He gave a nuclear deal to Indian that would leave it with its fast breeder reactors unmonitored to keep producing as much fuel for weapons as it likes, with Pakistan desperately trailing all the time to maintain its minimum deterrence at great economic costs. He was all praise for President Hamid Karzai, whose effective authority doesn’t run beyond his own mansion, for taking his people marching on the road of democracy. And for Pakistan? Well, much may have transpired in his meeting with his host, President Pervez Musharraf. But what came to the public fore wasn’t that exhilarating. It was only promises or expectations, nothing tangible to dance and sing about.

Before his visit, the official spin-doctors here had put out that a raft of agreements and memoranda of understanding would be signed when he arrives in Islamabad. None was signed. Not even a bilateral investment treaty, which they had touted to be the opener of new vistas of trade and economic ties between the two countries. For the nuclear deal with India, the American officials had burnt the midnight oil with their Indian interlocutors to finalise it for signing during his New Delhi visit. No such urgency was shown by the Americans to close this investment agreement with Pakistan for its signing during his Islamabad sojourn.

And if some incorrigible optimists, who were reading a lot in US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s magic words “not for the time being” to give themselves to the delusion that an India-like nuclear deal could also come to Pakistan, their hopes were put paid by Mr. Bush. He left no doubt about it that for such a deal his administration doesn’t view India and Pakistan alike but differently. The only sop he had for Pakistan was that his energy secretary would come here some time to discuss its energy needs. What thereafter, he didn’t mention that, too. Is this how the Bush administration is to augment America’s strategic partnership with Pakistan on long-term basis?
Nor was there anything new about his utterances on the Kashmir issue, which the spin-doctors had stated to be his discussions’ focal point with his host. America, he stated, could play a facilitator’s role, which it was performing, but the issue has to be resolved through bilateral negotiations by the two leaders of India and Pakistan, whom he paid rich tributes for conducting them courageously. But this is neither here nor there, even as the issue might have been discussed intensively by the two presidents in their talks. If something big emerged in those discussions, that is a different matter. But these public statements do not signify any extraordinary interest on his part to use his clout for the settlement of this dispute which is so fundamental to lasting peace and normality on the subcontinent.
I
n these times, President Musharraf has publicly floated many a proposal for resolving the dispute, only to draw silence or rejection from the Indian leadership. For whatever reasons, Mr. Bush didn’t allude to these initiatives in his public discourse either in New Delhi or in Islamabad. But he was not a wee bit reticent in stating, at least in his Indian media encounters, that he would take up India’s allegations of cross-border terrorism in his meetings with the Pakistan leadership during his visit to Islamabad.

By every reckoning, it was terrorism that was the main agenda of his visit to Islamabad. And even as he spoke some words of praise for President Musharraf’s commitment to fight this evil out and Pakistan’s role in the war on terror, the Indian and the Afghan allegations of cross border infiltration had apparently carried much weight with him. This was quite evident from his pronouncement that much needs to be done to nab the al-Qaeda leaders and fighters. Our own grouse, which we presume was voiced by our leadership in the meeting with him, that Afghanistan has become the hub of Indian intelligence agencies to wok against us, doesn’t seem to have bothered him any measurably. He, in fact, wants Pakistan to pull out his chestnuts from the fire in Afghanistan, no matter whatever costs it, as do the Indians in occupied Kashmir. And it is for our leaders to ponder very seriously over the pros and cons of what we are expected to do.

And we really are shocked the way our commentators and private media channels have projected his visit in relation to our prevalent political dispensation. The elite across the spectrum may have appointed the Americans this country’s headmasters and viceroys, but the people do not recognise them to be so. They abhor the interference of foreigners, whoever they be, in our internal matters which they want our own leaders to resolve themselves without seeking the guidance or meddling of the outsiders. Isn’t it disgraceful that panelists of the talk shows were focussed on what this visit meant for our internal political matters and not as much on what it meant for our international relationships, especially the ties with the United States? Something has really gone wrong with our elite across the spectrum.
__________________
Life is a kaleidoscope of flaws, desires, emotions and mishaps__ YHK
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Monday, March 06, 2006
Babban Miyan Ding Dong's Avatar
Senior Member
Best Moderator Award: Awarded for censoring all swearing and keeping posts in order. - Issue reason: Best ModMedal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Road Pe
Posts: 406
Thanks: 4
Thanked 134 Times in 18 Posts
Babban Miyan Ding Dong is on a distinguished road
Default

Assalam Alaikum,

It seems like Mushy is licking his deep wounds inflicted as a result of being an effective ally, and be left alone by his masters when the time came to reward his hard work. Therefore, he is taking his frustrations out on Karzai.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/03/05/musharraf/index.html

Bush ka chamcha, na pakistan ka aur na hi kissi aur ka.

I'd say he should consider an extreme makeover to change his profession because this one seems to be failing him. As a result he has also failed the whole nation of Pakistan whom he was suppose to serve.

Thanks.

Last edited by Babban Miyan Ding Dong; Monday, March 06, 2006 at 09:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Tuesday, March 07, 2006
KhalidBinWaleed's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the hearts of all BRAVE men.
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
KhalidBinWaleed is on a distinguished road
Default Our acheivements!

SalamAliekum,

Indeed a sad moment. Although we had sacrificed the blood of 40 or 50 Muslims just before the arrival of the leader of Infidels, all what he had to say to us was “You didn’t do enough!”

Not to say that, we have also been helping them through our intelligence agencies in Afghanistan, from the time they first came in. Though our agencies fail to meet the needs of internal security, and the “Hidden Hands” can cause violence anywhere, ranging from burnouts in Lahore and Peshawar, to bombings in Karachi, they are quite active in helping the Infidels to get some more Afghans dead.
In return: We get 17 (or was it 18) of our innocent villagers dead

We catch some of their criminals, the so-called Al-Qaedians, and pass them on to be put into the Cuban jail, just for being a Muslim.
In return: We get ourselves portrayed as the DOG of our American masters.

We become their foremost ally in war against terror (what I call as “war against every practicing Muslim”), and help them in “De-stabilizing” every terror cell.
In return: We get empty promises of age old F-16s, which, although are obsolete for them, but remember what they thought of us when we turned over Al-Qaeda men? Exactly! So, of course we’ll only get left-overs, and that too, after we’ve whined a lot that we need something….

We turn to “Enlightened Moderation”, allowing our channels to portray what they portray, and change the average Muslim’s thought to be what the infidels want it to be.
In return: Huh? We get nothing but more people with empty brains, living in the fantasies of the movie and drama worlds. (A close friend told me that in his village, when one of the presumably “Dead” character (who had died in a previous episode), suddenly returned in the drama, people in his village bought sweets and distributed them on the streets!!!)
Only if our very “Enlightened” govt. could see the enlightment and the Moderation in True Islam, our less educated people could also have been a bit sensible.

All said and done, I’d just quote what musharraf has to say about himself: “I’ll get off the seat when Pakistanis don’t like me anymore”. Well, Mr. President, I think you need to consider the common citizens of Pakistan as Pakistanis too, not only the elite in whose circle you happen to spend ur life.


Regards
__________________
[FONT="Arial Narrow"]"Nothing sharpens sight like [COLOR="Red"]envy" [/COLOR] - Thomas Fuller[/FONT]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Constitution of the United States Muhammad Adnan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 3 Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present Sumairs Pakistan Affairs 13 Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM
History of Presidentship in Pakistan Naseer Ahmed Chandio General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 1 Tuesday, May 31, 2011 03:00 PM
FPSC Recruitment Tests safdarmehmood General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 2 Sunday, January 25, 2009 05:38 PM
How 2 be a President of USA Muhammad Adnan Constitutional Law 2 Thursday, December 08, 2005 01:16 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.