Thursday, April 25, 2024
12:26 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Monday, April 12, 2010
aariz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 756
Thanks: 439
Thanked 446 Times in 319 Posts
aariz is just really niceaariz is just really niceaariz is just really niceaariz is just really nice
Smile How can the provinces be made fully autonomous?

How can the provinces be made fully autonomous ?

Regards
__________________
Try not to become a man of success but a man of value.

Last edited by Arbab.Danish; Monday, April 12, 2010 at 11:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Monday, April 12, 2010
fromQAU's Avatar
40th CTP (OMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 333
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 471
Thanks: 334
Thanked 459 Times in 259 Posts
fromQAU will become famous soon enoughfromQAU will become famous soon enough
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by aariz View Post
How can the provinces be made fully autonomous ?

Regards
the provinces can be made fully autonomous by delegating all the important subjects of local importance to them especially by eliminating the con-current list.the tax and revenue collection powers should also be given to the provinces.the centre should only have CURRENCY, DEFENCE, FOREIGN POLICY, FOREIGN TRADE etc and such other critically important national departments.
it is through this way that the provinces can be fully autonomous.

but at the moment it is, definitely, not in the interest of Pakistan as this country is not economically rich and its center depends significantly on the provinces' tax and revenue generation.so is the case with india and many other Third-World countries even China where the provinces or federating units are partly autonomous.so, Pakistan is not alone in this long haul.
Thanks. i hope that u would have grasped this topic fairly well.
GOD Bless U.
__________________
Recite a Darood Shareef at least once and now.
(RAFIQUE AHMED KHOKHAR)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Monday, April 12, 2010
DEADLYDOCTOR's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: R.I.P(Rest In Peace)
Posts: 742
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,143 Times in 374 Posts
DEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really nice
Default this is one way of seeing it

Provincial Autonomy Vs Provincial Rights

Nationalist and sub nationalist elements and small ethnic political parties are more vocal for complete provincial autonomy without realizing the fact that it is not possible in a federated state like Pakistan. In a federation there is always two layers of governance and administration; one at federal level and other at provincial level and there are always some enabling mechanisms in between to make both work. Federation, in its true sense is very different from what these elements and parities are demanding i.e. confederation.

Federation has no concept of imposing the will of center on province while at same time it is directly in contradiction of complete provincial autonomy. There must be a balance between provinces and center among all pertaining issues of governance and management and this is something we don’t see in Pakistan. Every party after coming into power tried its level best to grab maximum powers to have absolute control. This pale political practice has given one and only one thing to the nation in return and that is “absolute corruption with no accountability” like it is said; Absolute power brings absolute corruption.

For decades rulers kept on making amendments in constitution to gain maximum power so that they can avoid any political opposition while ruling. This curse has not only ruined the concept of federating state by providing opportunity to provincial autonomy activists to spread misconceptions but has also brought national progress at stall while other competing nations are thriving for progress in the region i.e China, India and Bangladesh.

This must be understood by the politicians, intellectuals, academia and thinkers that in presence of current state of corruption at all levels in society and in absence of any reliable accountability mechanism more provincial autonomy will only lead to more crisis in Pakistan. Same corrupt political lot of decision makers have been attached to various kind of systems in Pakistan but due to massive corruption and plain ineptness in managing day to day state issues they have failed to come up with solutions of problems in and in between provinces. Instead of presenting solution of the major crisis in the country at this juncture of time so called nationalist politicians used the issues to move forward their agenda to have more powers by presenting provincial autonomy as a divine remedy for these crucial problems like water management, food shortages, energy, terrorism etc.


Provincial Autonomy in context of Governance & Management

Some analysts supporting provincial autonomy are of view that disparity between size of Punjab and other provinces is a major bone of contention in gaining inter provincial harmony so Punjab must be split between two to three smaller provinces so that reservation of other provinces can be overcome and also it will help in improving management and governance in newly formed smaller provinces. Another group has same kind of views about Baluchistan which, according to this group, must be divided into two to three smaller provinces so that social uplift in the Baluchistan can be put in top gear.

From a bird eye view these proposals seems to be very realistic and workable. In its pure management and governance incarnation this is what must be done as well but with these proposals there are some important questions which must be answered before;

1. How smaller provinces, consisting on Punjabi population will solve the problem of provincial disharmony and how they will promote ethnic cohesion in Pakistani state?
2. Dividing larger provinces into smaller one is not something equal to provincial autonomy. So how provincial autonomy will be granted with this divide of larger provinces into smaller one? Provincial autonomy is a subject directly between center and provinces regardless how big or small they are.
3. How diverse demography of various ethnic groups in Pakistan will be managed in this new setup? This arrangement can lead to a more dire situation as with this division Punjabis and Baluchis will have more than one provinces of their while Pukhtuns and Sindhis will have just one. This will destroy existing political and ethnic harmony and balance in national institutions like Senate (where equal representation of all provinces has been ensured). With this new arrangement rationale of Senate will come to an end as Punjabi or Baluchi will have more representation in Senate. Punjab already has most seats in National Assembly. How equal representation of all ethnic blocks will be ensured in Senate with split of larger provinces?
4. Like stated above, there is no grantee that corrupt elements within new provinces will work for social betterment.

So a quick look at issues raised above one can see that dividing larger provinces is not a solution to any challenge; neither governance nor provincial autonomy and ethnic harmony rather political situation will become more fragile in case of latter challenge if this approach is followed.

Current constitution of Pakistan has described the role of both central and provincial governments along with their mandates. There are 47 items in constitution (Concurrent List) enlisted in schedule IV of constitution which are shared among provinces and center.

This list was to be abolished within the ten years of formulation of constitution but it is still there. Presence of concurrent list is another source of contention between center and provinces. Constitution demands to eliminate concurrent list but has no clear directions in it about how to eliminate it. Not all the 47 items can be transferred under the provincial control but some of them can be but political consensus on various items is a big issue for any government.

Elimination of concurrent list is necessary but this must be done in a manner that ensures maximum possible provincial rights to provinces while remaining apart from complete provincial autonomy at same time. There is a big difference between two e.g. gaining more control over natural resources, collecting some of the taxes directly does not mean provincial autonomy these are rights of provinces that must be respected by center on the other hand provinces must also allow center to have departments like Education, language, central reserves and foreign exchange, law and order under its control along with more obvious areas like defense and foreign affairs.

A big issue here is lack of skilled work force in smaller provinces. Departments under provincial governments like police and health are merely functioning as per required so bringing more department in provinces from center will demand even more skilled work personnel and every province would eager to employ its own people in these provincial departments. Baluchistan and NWFP will have real difficulties in bridging demand of that kind of work force at all levels in provinces.


It is surprising that no party advocating provincial autonomy is talking about these issues as how provincial rights must be granted to the provinces so that people there can have some kind of sense of ownership.


Provincial Autonomy in context of National integrity


A bigger challenge that provincial autonomy can pose is something similar to what Awami League’s demand of provincial autonomy did in 1970s i.e. an armed insurgency backed by hostile countries in the region like India. India played key role in secession of East Pakistan in guise of helping Awami League leadership in getting provincial autonomy and rights.

Current situation in Pakistan is not very different as nation and state both are fighting toughest war of their survival since last half decade now. Multiple insurgencies with varying strengths have erupted in the country particularly in Western and North Western provinces.

As Pakistan armed forces have crushed insurgency in Swat Malakand it have now become evident that these insurgencies are not just the fall out of Pakistan’s decision to support US in war on terror rather are part of 4th generation warfare tactics being employed against Pakistan by forces like CIA, Mossad and RAW.

Courtesy to some poor management of national security affairs by previous and current regimes foreign meddling into Pakistani political process has surpassed the red line since quite some time now. Pakistan has become kind of state where most serious decisions are being made by some foreign bureaucrats like Richard Holbrook. It was just recently when various national security institutes started asserting themselves to resist this foreign meddling into Pakistan’s critical issues but still a long way to go before Pakistani state can bring itself out of foreign influence completely.

It is really sad reality that in these testing times instead of backing Pakistani security establishment in securing vital national security interests in and around the region current political leadership has distanced itself from this war and is more in mode of appeasement of US by invoking debate of provincial autonomy at this critical time.

Current government has formed a committee of legislators to propose and amendments in the constitution so that it can be brought back to its original form of 1973 but there are some serious issues among the legislators on some subjects and provincial autonomy is one of them.

Pakistan can not afford to open this Pandora box right now. Provinces are very critical on some issues like water and energy. Punjab and Sindh are in head-on collision on water distribution and Chasma-Jehlum Link canal power project announced by government of Punjab recently.

Now in this situation it will become very difficult to keep things under control if provincial autonomy is assigned to provinces. Punjab can initiate KBD (Kala Bagh Dam) project which is vital for its energy and agriculture needs but Sindh will not remain salient on this and can call for international mediation or can deny access to port of Karachi to any Punjab based industry.

Things will not remain up to just that, hostile agencies waiting for opportunities would not spare a second to create mayhem by killing ethnic minorities in both provinces. Riots and clashes in streets would be unavoidable. In long term, this situation can damage national fabric beyond the point of any repair later on.

Issues like water crisis are not made up by provinces but are culmination of sheer mismanagement and treacherous policies at federal level on the issue by both current and previous governments. Provincial autonomy will not solve it rather would pose a more dire crisis which is already is in making as India has stopped flow of Pakistani rivers by building dams on these rivers by violating IWT of 1960.

History has taught a very tough lesson to Pakistani nation that provincial autonomy is a tool of propaganda warfare used by Indian successfully throughout 1960s and Pakistan had to pay price in 1971. Situation is once again similar Pakistani nation is under attack by Indian and Western media war who are using provincial autonomy, objective analysis and exaggerated facts as their weapons in this media war. Pakistan needs to take some serious steps to combat evil of provincialism.

Proposals


There are few proposals to combat evil of provincialism.

1. Elimination of Corruption

Pakistan has only one way forward on subject of provincial autonomy and that is to follow what Quaid-i-Azim said in his above mentioned speech at Quetta. To seek solution below is another excerpt of same speech he made on 15 June 1948;

If each individual thus being scrutinizing himself and forces--for initially it will require a certain amount of force--upon himself the principal of honesty to others as well as to himself, regardless of fear or favor. I see a very bright future ahead. If individuals both officials and non-officials play their part thus and work in this spirit, the Government, the Nation and the State will immediately bear their stamp, and Pakistan will emerge triumphantly as one of the greatest nations of the world.

It is evident that Quaid called for pure Islamic concept of self accountability so that no individual can be allured by any kind corruption. It is corruption at different levels that has put Pakistan into current state of affairs. As said by Quaid at the end of Muslim League legislator convention;
“We have lost the fullness of our noble character. And what is charcter?- Highest sense of honour and highest sense of integrity, conviction, incorruptibility , readiness at any time to efface oneself for the collective good of the nation”. (10 April 1946, Delhi)

Pakistan is facing same dilemma once again and only solution to get out of this is to curb corruption at every level at any cost. Had Pakistan a strong accountability system situation would have very different in every filed of life including provincial harmony. This is corruption that has put sheer sense of deprivation in masses through out the country and hence it must be eliminated.

2. Pakistani Nationalism

Like it was said by Quaid some 62 year ago, it is Pakistani nationalism that can keep Pakistan united in every kind of circumstances. Pakistan must protect its ideology jealously through.

Education and Language are two sensitive areas in this regard in any country and Pakistan is no exception. These areas will overlap between center and provinces. Neither provinces nor center can cope with these subjects alone. Center must provide the provinces with a broad framework of education at every level in such a manner that this framework must grantee the safeguard ideology of Pakistan throughout whole education system.

Also, center must do everything possible to safe Urdu in education system by adopting it as a medium of instructions in institutions and universities in higher education while provinces must do the same at their level.

Language and Education are two most important pillars against curse of provincialism and must be cultivated to nation’s interests.


Another major area in which government must work on war footing is media management in context of ideology of Pakistan so that propaganda of provincial autonomy can be thwarted. India and US are investing in Pakistani media to initiate media wars more aggressively and it is already evident that real target of this war is ideology of Pakistan that is in direct clash of provincial autonomy.

3. Provision of Provincial rights

Provision of provincial rights by solving issues like concurrent list is imperative but how this will be done is a subject where most of the brains in intellectual community of Pakistan must start pondering. Provinces in Pakistan are highly interdependent on each other and on center as well for various resources.

Pakistan needs some kind of enabling bodies that can work with center and province at same time on issues which are inter linked like security, higher education, revenue etc. Both center and province must follow the guidelines of the enabling bodies in each field.

4. Capacity Building

Many problems that smaller provinces are facing are direct result of lack of adequate man power and not having capacity to cope with challenges of modern age management issues.

Capacity building is as important as eliminating concurrent list and provinces must form specialized academies so that new managers and administrators can be trained to take responsibilities in new departments which would be handed over to provinces separately

Conclusion

Corruption and mismanagement over the decades have distorted the social fabric of the Pakistani nation. Not only nation but state also has suffered from lack of leadership due to corruption while corrupt kept on enjoying higher echelons of power poor kept on suffer in society. This has caused a deep sense of deprivation in masses particularly in smaller provinces.

Nationalist and sub nationalist elements in Pakistani political system, who otherwise know that they cannot form government in Islamabad, are now exploiting the situation to push their agenda of provincial autonomy ahead.


Pakistan has to overcome this corruption in its political system and must also get rid of elements that always seek more and more power while sitting in the center. On the other hand Pakistani nation must reject any ethnic or linguistic appeal by any political party or group in order to show Pakistani nationalism rather than provincialism.

Quaid-e-Azam gave principles of statesmanship on this issue as well like all other fields and it is time for Pakistani state to put these principles forward for nation building.


for further reading refer to this link
source :http://www.brasstacks.pk/index.php?o...mid=95&lang=en
__________________
Reality is something you rise above.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present Sumairs Pakistan Affairs 13 Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM
Hasba Bill Mysterious_Norton Pakistan Affairs 1 Thursday, July 21, 2005 02:09 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.