|
Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only. |
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Why the Corruption Flourishes during PPP regime ?
Although pakistan has always been considered among the corrupt countries of the world, but what i have observed is that whenever the PPP govt. comes in power, the scale and magnitude of corruption increases many folds.
Is this a special attribute attached with the People's Party or some forces take advantage of the soft attitude of PPP towards the corrupts ? Your comments plz. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sociologist PU For This Useful Post: | ||
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
PPP is the single party of Pakistan in which there is majorrity of feudal lords(Sardar Shahi), so because of their ill attitude towards the system. PPP is famous and leads all the time in the field of corruption They usually appoint many officers on a fixed rate and their priority is to appoint all their near and dears. And also one more reason for this all other parties except PPP, are pro-establishment parties, and from Zulfiqar Ali Bhtto to Ms.Benzair, they all were anti-establishment so during their regime they are very much exposed through various channels
__________________
"There is little difference in people; but, that little difference makes a big difference. That little difference is attitude. The big difference is whether it is positive or nagative." -- W. Clement Stone |
The Following User Says Thank You to xavier For This Useful Post: | ||
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Money won't buy happiness, but it will pay the salaries of a large research staff to study the problem. Last edited by Princess Royal; Tuesday, May 04, 2010 at 08:46 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to sillent.killer For This Useful Post: | ||
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Well, the question arise here is why the voters of Pakistan select them again and again inspite of the fact that they are proven corrupt ?
I am using the word "voters" cuz all the people dont vote in election and maximum turn out in the election is around 50%. Is this due to the fact that in all election there are same voters and same canidates everytime and remaining 50% dont turn up ? And if the remaining 50% also came out to cast their votes, the result would be surprising ? lets deleberate as there is no other way to bring change.
__________________
/// Aur be ghum hain zamanay main muhabat kay siwa /// |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sociologist PU For This Useful Post: | ||
#5
|
||||
|
||||
PPP stands on the strength of its die hard workers. These very people are its vote bank and generate the support from amongst the masses. So whenever PPP comes to power, it tries to reward its workers by hook or by crook. The range of workers vary from lowest level to the highest.
__________________
Muhammad Ali Asghar |
The Following User Says Thank You to maliasghar For This Useful Post: | ||
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Ohh, i see, good point.
I also know some of the highest level "workers" being rewarded these days. Not sure about the low level workers.
__________________
/// Aur be ghum hain zamanay main muhabat kay siwa /// |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sociologist PU For This Useful Post: | ||
#7
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But the core debate is still there; let me put the Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's reign for Curruption debate (The real PPP's period). You will find the lowest ever Curruption rate in Pakistan History i.e. 1.43 % according to Transparancy International Report which I have already shared in other thread. This will automatically negate your core thought, I do agree with your secondary and additional reasonings but the most important is leadership capability which matters a lot. Quote:
Let me put some figures for Governmental comparison on basis of curruption: General Ayyub khan = 2.14 % Z A Bhutto = 1.43 % General Zia = 1.54 % Benazir Bhutto (88-90) = 8 % Nawaz Shareef (90-93) = 10 % Benazir Bhutto (93-95) = 48 % Nawaz Shareef (96-99) = 38 % General Musharraf (99-02) = 34 % General Musharraf (02-06) = 67 % This report of transparancy international was published in end of 2006 so you could compare the ruling elites. I don't have updated info with me but I am 100 % sure that curruption would be more than Musharraf's regime. Regards
__________________
You cannot hate a person when you know him |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tx_ned For This Useful Post: | ||
azeegum (Wednesday, May 05, 2010), kiyani (Wednesday, June 02, 2010), Sociologist PU (Wednesday, May 05, 2010), xavier (Wednesday, May 05, 2010) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
@ txned
I agree that leadership does matter, i welcome your every comment and criticism and also welcome any debate on party structure.
__________________
"There is little difference in people; but, that little difference makes a big difference. That little difference is attitude. The big difference is whether it is positive or nagative." -- W. Clement Stone |
The Following User Says Thank You to xavier For This Useful Post: | ||
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I wonder what they do with the ill-gotten money as a person has a limited time span in his/her life and all the huge amount they collect remained there in lockers and bank accounts without any use to everyone.
__________________
/// Aur be ghum hain zamanay main muhabat kay siwa /// |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sociologist PU For This Useful Post: | ||
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Although we are Muslim country but majority of the parliamentarian did not know how to read The Quran, when majority do not know what Quran and Islam says," then how could they understand that corruption is a criminal offense". I hope you get my point. Quote:
Look at the practical things what Chandias family who were killed during Zia regime what did they get, 28 young boys were killed in MRD. Now there siblings are suffering and arguing that, this was a big mistake that they sacrificed for PPP
__________________
"There is little difference in people; but, that little difference makes a big difference. That little difference is attitude. The big difference is whether it is positive or nagative." -- W. Clement Stone Last edited by Andrew Dufresne; Wednesday, May 05, 2010 at 06:38 PM. Reason: Merged |
The Following User Says Thank You to xavier For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Corruption | zaib | Essays | 1 | Saturday, October 14, 2006 09:35 AM |
Corruption | Abeer | Essays | 0 | Wednesday, November 09, 2005 07:56 AM |