#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed! It should be secular!
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Islam wants only The Rule of Allah on this land. No one else has any right to establish his rule here. Islamic State of Madina and Fatah Makkah are the biggest examples from the life of our Huzoor Nabi e Akram SAW. Armed campaigns to the areas outside Arab by Khulafa e Rashideen were also to establish the writ of Allah on this land, so there is no question whether the state should be an Islamic or secular as the example of world's most brilliant state can be seen in the era of our Holy Prophet PBUH and Khulafa e Rashideen.. The answer is straight forward the state should be Islamic. Islam has never been implemented in Pakistan so how we can say that an Islamic state produces discrimination. We should remember the three choices given by our Muslim Army to Non Muslims which were: 1) Embrace Islam and become our brothers. 2) Accept Supremacy of Islam and give Jizya. 3) Get ready for battle.
It is clear that Islam does not forces some one to be a Muslim rather it protects his rights by giving him an option to live peacefully according to his own religion in Islamic state but he will have to pay Jizya to Islamic state. This is a bitter pill for our modern scholars.But when Allah has decided who we are to challenge it. Of course a person reciting Kalima and a non believer can never be equal. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Najam Nawaz Saqib For This Useful Post: | ||
aariz (Friday, July 01, 2011), Hera Faraz (Thursday, September 22, 2011), Malmeena Khan (Friday, July 01, 2011) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
How it should be? U mean every sate or only Islamic republic?
Regards Quote:
__________________
Try not to become a man of success but a man of value. Last edited by Rixwan; Friday, July 01, 2011 at 12:56 AM. Reason: Merged |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Islamic state should be ruled like
Caliph Umar(ra)the great Caliph Abu Bakr(ra) Caliph Moula Ali (ra) Caliph Usman ghani (ra) Caliph Hasan (ra) Caliph Umar bin abdul-aziz (ra) Otherwise it should be secular
__________________
Forget safety.Live where you fear to live.Destroy your reputation.Be notorious |
The Following User Says Thank You to imbindas For This Useful Post: | ||
Malmeena Khan (Friday, July 01, 2011) |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
So far as mishappenings with hindus of sindh, sikhs of kpk, christians and qadianis are concerned then i think it's not the fault of namely ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN. It's the failure of your leaders governing your country for their personal aims and objectives while deteriorating the CONSTITUTION of PAKISTAN. If you're raising your voice for non muslims/minorities here,then,can't you see grabbing the rights of thousands of innocent muslims in the same state you're pointing.Same thing is going on in the so called secular states, one like India. Why not the rights of kashmiris are considered? India is a secular state it should consider.. it should have?? What happened with the muslims in AHAMAD ABAD(india)? If you're talking about the right of non muslims/minorities in your country to have the favour of minority to be called the so called secular, then please be honest as a secular and raise voice for those innocent muslims being killed and are still killing by the so called seculars and human rights watchers.A muslim state should not be a secular state as Islam reserves the rights of all religions, IF the rulers are like KHULFA E RASHEEDEEN, as imbindas discussed. Regards,
__________________
You've got to get the stage in life where GOING for it is more important than WINNIG or LOSING. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Malmeena Khan For This Useful Post: | ||
Najam Nawaz Saqib (Friday, July 01, 2011) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
@aariz
exactly.the terms LIBERALISM and SECULARISM are mangled. it is owing to the misconceptions as created by our critics. but literally as well as terminologically there is a world of difference between both terms. --------------------secular means religionless --------------------while liberal stands for rational+moderate .and religion can be accommodated in it. Do you think that JINNAH was a secular person inspite of his spiritual efforts to establish an ideological religious state? Do you consider IQBAL a non religious person or a pagan? -------If both were not secular but staunch admirers of muslim political philosophy,then .....the fallacy and propaganda that both were secular ,dies ultimately. And if, jinnah(the founding father of pakistan) and IQBAL(the ideological father of pakistan) were not secular .then how can it be possible for a nation and a civilization created by both ,to be secular.
__________________
ali imraan |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regards
__________________
Fight for your dreams & your dreams will fight for you. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
@maha
Actually,there is a misconception that if we pay respect to the minorities or other sects then we essentially have to be secular to do this. Secularism terminologically has nothing to do with honouring the minorities. it has just one objective:RELIGIONLESSNESS ALL other things are not concerned with this term. As regards to providing liberty to other religions,this clause was added to secularism afterwards.you cannot find this definition in GEORGE JACOB HOLLIOKE,s writings who coined that term.read the following; Secularism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Infact,ISLAM is the only religious system which had officially provided the society (in city state of MADINA) with equal rights to all minorities by declaring JEWS and CHRISTIANS as equal citizens by calling them "UMMAH". no other religion has officially accommodated the religious minorities. So, the notion that Islamic system if implemented can create obstacles for minorities is false. that,s why there is no need of SECULARISM to honour the minorities since we have a better substitute of this. Moreover, in the multiethnic,multilingual,multicolour and multi religions society of pakistan,islam is the only binding force alongwith cricket(sorry to say). If someone inorder to follow blindly the western socalled intellactuallism tends to erase this binding force then the following offsprings would be created; PAKHTOONISTAN,REPUBLICS OF BLAUCHISTAN,SINDHU DESH etc.
__________________
ali imraan |
The Following User Says Thank You to ali emraan For This Useful Post: | ||
Faisal86 (Wednesday, September 28, 2011) |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
religion is part and parcel of ideology of Pakistan,we snatched this land from Hindus and british just for the sake of Islam....suppose we adopt secularism then what must be the source of guidance to run the affairs?.........which philosphy,law or principle will show us the path....why dont we say that we must not be at any exreme but we must be moderate Muslims with respect to all religions...you cant blame Islam for this fiasco which we are facing today,its due to misinterpretation of Islam.....further our ruling people are not less than seculars...then why to repeat the mantra"stat must be secular"....Sorry dear we have no escape from Islam.
__________________
main is karam k kahan tha qabil..Huzoor SAW ki bnda prwari hai |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sajjad sadique For This Useful Post: | ||
ali emraan (Friday, July 01, 2011), Malmeena Khan (Friday, July 01, 2011), Najam Nawaz Saqib (Friday, July 01, 2011) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constitution of the United States | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 3 | Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Islamic Concept of Govt? | Maha Khan | Discussion | 9 | Friday, April 30, 2010 02:25 PM |
CONVENTION of OIC on combating international terrorism | MUKHTIAR ALI | Current Affairs Notes | 1 | Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:10 AM |