Friday, March 29, 2024
01:27 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
azure's Avatar
42nd CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2013 - Merit 190
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 135
Thanks: 428
Thanked 115 Times in 78 Posts
azure will become famous soon enough
Default

And what do they mean by "one examiner for one subject"
Does that mean one person has to check all the answer sheets of one subject!
If so, their policy is terribly wrong. Aik he bandey pr stress daal deyn gey itna tou iska result candidate becharey ko dekhna parey ga!
-
Instead of over burdening one person, they must set a standard about how to evaluate the paper. And increase the number of paper checkers and make sure all those paper checkers follow that same standard.
__________________
I am a great believer in luck and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it .
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to azure For This Useful Post:
samia fakhar (Saturday, June 16, 2012)
  #12  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
DEADLYDOCTOR's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: R.I.P(Rest In Peace)
Posts: 742
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,143 Times in 374 Posts
DEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really nice
Default

@Raz
sir i have mentioned in my post clearly 'till date'. still i don't believe but when an official said it so clearly,there is no point of resisting. and role of examiner marking is seen in this exam. many brilliant rather the best aspirants failed to score. many examples are there.
even in my post http://www.cssforum.com.pk/197491-post8.html i have mentioned the same thing 'THE EXAMINER' as main factor in scoring high or low.
__________________
Reality is something you rise above.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
fromQAU's Avatar
40th CTP (OMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 333
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 471
Thanks: 334
Thanked 459 Times in 259 Posts
fromQAU will become famous soon enoughfromQAU will become famous soon enough
Exclamation




I was wrong
and i got the punishment for that wrong.
Academies are right and they must celebrate the fact that their theory of high and low scoring subjects has been verified yesterday.
__________________
Recite a Darood Shareef at least once and now.
(RAFIQUE AHMED KHOKHAR)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fromQAU For This Useful Post:
sohaib nazir chattha (Saturday, June 16, 2012)
  #14  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
sabahatbhutta's Avatar
42nd CTP (PAAS)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2013 - Merit 66
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Multan
Posts: 569
Thanks: 475
Thanked 657 Times in 291 Posts
sabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to behold
Default

If the theory of Low-scoring and high-scoring subjects is true, then why all the people opting the High-scoring objects do not get allocation???
its all about confusion, when a candidate gets confused about his subject selection he can not do justice with that subject, and hence we say its low scoring or that was high scoring.
There comes the Luck-factor.
jesy hum sab log bachpan main dua mangty thy, Ya Allah paper check krny waly k dil main rehm daal dyna....
It can be possible that the person in a particular year or couple of years, who marks the paper of Geography is more kind than the one who marks Economics....
But the Lucky and able ones do get high marks even in Economics...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
Farrah Zafar's Avatar
Makhzan-e-Urdu Adab
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: امید نگری
Posts: 2,362
Thanks: 2,346
Thanked 4,047 Times in 1,576 Posts
Farrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud ofFarrah Zafar has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabahatbhutta View Post
[B]If the theory of Low-scoring and high-scoring subjects is true, then why all the people opting the High-scoring objects do not get allocation???
Because the trend varies from year to year.No one exactly knows which subject will be high scoring/low scoring.

Quote:
its all about confusion, when a candidate gets confused about his subject selection he can not do justice with that subject, and hence we say its low scoring or that was high scoring.
Just see Usman's DMC.

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/438373-post65.html

P.S My own brother who is masters in Mass communication got 33 in Journalism in C.E 2010(It is considered worst year for Journalism) and I who didn't prepare this subject,got 61 in 2011.Was he confused for his own subject?OR was I did more justice without preparation?

Quote:
But the Lucky and able ones do get high marks .
They are exceptional cases.If only one person gets 152 marks in Urdu,it doesn't mean all others were incompetent.Or If only a few cross 100 marks in Indopak then it doesn't mean all others had no grip over it.It means either their luck worked and examiner gave them marks in dizziness or they attempted extra ordinary papers.

So considering average scores,it's all about scoring trend.
__________________
Love is my Shield,Truth is my Sword,Brain is my Crown,Smile is my Treasure and I'm a Queen;
Quitters never win and Winners never quit..!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Farrah Zafar For This Useful Post:
sohaib nazir chattha (Saturday, June 16, 2012), usman khalid (Monday, June 18, 2012)
  #16  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
fromQAU's Avatar
40th CTP (OMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 333
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 471
Thanks: 334
Thanked 459 Times in 259 Posts
fromQAU will become famous soon enoughfromQAU will become famous soon enough
Exclamation

my question is that why is this exam dependent on luck and not on hard work and ability?

an able and hardworking person should only pray for getting favours from the so-called LUCK? and if the LUCK does not favour him where stand his ability and hardwork? have those two later elements any importance then?
__________________
Recite a Darood Shareef at least once and now.
(RAFIQUE AHMED KHOKHAR)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fromQAU For This Useful Post:
aghaadnan (Friday, January 24, 2014)
  #17  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: ISB
Posts: 56
Thanks: 32
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
alimanzoor10 is on a distinguished road
Smile

In my humble opinion the score depends on examiner's whims,mood, temperament and the timing of marking the papers.....
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
Bilal Hassan's Avatar
43rd CTP (PAS)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2014 - Merit 13
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Deputy Commissioner Hunza Nagar
Posts: 1,090
Thanks: 195
Thanked 1,551 Times in 674 Posts
Bilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fromQAU View Post
my question is that why is this exam dependent on luck and not on hard work and ability?

an able and hardworking person should only pray for getting favours from the so-called LUCK? and if the LUCK does not favour him where stand his ability and hardwork? have those two later elements any importance then?
a discussion is already going on about the luck factor in CSS...please refer to that...
http://www.cssforum.com.pk/general/d...ified-not.html
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
fromQAU's Avatar
40th CTP (OMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 333
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 471
Thanks: 334
Thanked 459 Times in 259 Posts
fromQAU will become famous soon enoughfromQAU will become famous soon enough
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilal Hassan View Post
a discussion is already going on about the luck factor in CSS...please refer to that...
http://www.cssforum.com.pk/general/d...ified-not.html


this thread is not about luck...this is about the high and low scoring subjects.... i just gave an example of luck being the determining factor in css.
__________________
Recite a Darood Shareef at least once and now.
(RAFIQUE AHMED KHOKHAR)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Saturday, June 16, 2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In my Mom's heart
Posts: 208
Thanks: 484
Thanked 113 Times in 73 Posts
samia fakhar is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabahatbhutta View Post
If the theory of Low-scoring and high-scoring subjects is true, then why all the people opting the High-scoring objects do not get allocation???
its all about confusion, when a candidate gets confused about his subject selection he can not do justice with that subject, and hence we say its low scoring or that was high scoring.
There comes the Luck-factor.
jesy hum sab log bachpan main dua mangty thy, Ya Allah paper check krny waly k dil main rehm daal dyna....
It can be possible that the person in a particular year or couple of years, who marks the paper of Geography is more kind than the one who marks Economics....
But the Lucky and able ones do get high marks even in Economics...
and i m cofused that if FPSC is openly confessing that there are some low scoring subjects means FPSC itself advising aspirants to go for high scoring subjects then why is FPSC offering low scoring subjects? secondly if FPSC is saying that there are some high scoring and low scoring subjects then it should also provide the list as well. because in one year a subject is scoring and in another one the same subject is not so. then as css aspirant how will i come to know that this year this particular subject will go to fetch very good marks for me. So here is luck. if i m lucky i will go for subject which will fetch good marks in near future and vice versa. and this luck factor should be repalce with hard work.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samia fakhar For This Useful Post:
Faisal86 (Saturday, June 16, 2012), sabahatbhutta (Sunday, June 17, 2012)
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to reduce exam anxiety amy General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 9 Monday, April 11, 2016 11:41 PM
This is the Original Text of the fateful Memo ,Allegedly Delivered to Mullen SDM News & Articles 1 Friday, November 18, 2011 10:39 PM
Tips to score well in an Exam Saqib Riaz Tips and Experience Sharing 3 Saturday, October 10, 2009 02:20 PM
Competitive Tips to take the Competitive Exam (specially when baffled!) 36thCommons Humorous, Inspirational and General Stuff 0 Sunday, September 23, 2007 11:09 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.