Wednesday, February 21, 2024
09:52 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Naseer Ahmed Chandio's Avatar
39th CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 Merit 546
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Karachi
Posts: 134
Thanks: 1
Thanked 176 Times in 44 Posts
Naseer Ahmed Chandio is on a distinguished road
Arrow Women's Rights


Throughout most of history women generally have had fewer legal rights and career opportunities than men. Wifehood and motherhood were regarded as women's most significant professions. In the 20th century, however, women in most nations won the right to vote and increased their educational and job opportunities. Perhaps most important, they fought for—and to a large degree accomplished—a reevaluation of traditional views of their role in society.

Early Attitudes Toward Women

Since early times women have been uniquely viewed as a creative source of human life. Historically, however, they have been considered not only intellectually inferior to men but also a major source of temptation and evil. In Greek mythology, for example, it was a woman, Pandora, who opened the forbidden box and brought plagues and unhappiness to mankind. Early Roman law described women as children, forever inferior to men.
Early Christian theology perpetuated these views. St. Jerome, a 4th-century Latin father of the Christian church, said: “Woman is the gate of the devil, the path of wickedness, the sting of the serpent, in a word a perilous object.” Thomas Aquinas, the 13th-century Christian theologian, said that woman was “created to be man's helpmeet, but her unique role is in conception...since for other purposes men would be better assisted by other men.”
The attitude toward women in the East was at first more favorable. In ancient India, for example, women were not deprived of property rights or individual freedoms by marriage. But Hinduism, which evolved in India after about 500 BC, required obedience of women toward men. Women had to walk behind their husbands. Women could not own property, and widows could not remarry. In both East and West, male children were preferred over female children.
Nevertheless, when they were allowed personal and intellectual freedom, women made significant achievements. During the Middle Ages nuns played a key role in the religious life of Europe. Aristocratic women enjoyed power and prestige. Whole eras were influenced by women rulers—for instance, Queen Elizabeth of England in the 16th century, Catherine the Great of Russia in the 18th century, and Queen Victoria of England in the 19th century.

The Weaker gender?

Women were long considered naturally weaker than men, squeamish, and unable to perform work requiring muscular or intellectual development. In most preindustrial societies, for example, domestic chores were relegated to women, leaving “heavier” labor such as hunting and plowing to men. This ignored the fact that caring for children and doing such tasks as milking cows and washing clothes also required heavy, sustained labor. But physiological tests now suggest that women have a greater tolerance for pain, and statistics reveal that women live longer and are more resistant to many diseases.
Maternity, the natural biological role of women, has traditionally been regarded as their major social role as well. The resulting stereotype that “a woman's place is in the home” has largely determined the ways in which women have expressed themselves. Today, contraception and, in some areas, legalized abortion have given women greater control over the number of children they will bear. Although these developments have freed women for roles other than motherhood, the cultural pressure for women to become wives and mothers still prevents many talented women from finishing college or pursuing careers.
Traditionally a middle-class girl in Western culture tended to learn from her mother's example that cooking, cleaning, and caring for children was the behavior expected of her when she grew up. Tests made in the 1960s showed that the scholastic achievement of girls was higher in the early grades than in high school. The major reason given was that the girls' own expectations declined because neither their families nor their teachers expected them to prepare for a future other than that of marriage and motherhood. This trend has been changing in recent decades.
Formal education for girls historically has been secondary to that for boys. In colonial America girls learned to read and write at dame schools. They could attend the master's schools for boys when there was room, usually during the summer when most of the boys were working. By the end of the 19th century, however, the number of women students had increased greatly. Higher education particularly was broadened by the rise of women's colleges and the admission of women to regular colleges and universities. In 1870 an estimated one fifth of resident college and university students were women. By 1900 the proportion had increased to more than one third.
Women obtained 19 percent of all undergraduate college degrees around the beginning of the 20th century. By 1984 the figure had sharply increased to 49 percent. Women also increased their numbers in graduate study. By the mid-1980s women were earning 49 percent of all master's degrees and about 33 percent of all doctoral degrees. In 1985 about 53 percent of all college students were women, more than one quarter of whom were above age 29.

The Legal Status of Women

The myth of the natural inferiority of women greatly influenced the status of women in law. Under the common law of England, an unmarried woman could own property, make a contract, or sue and be sued. But a married woman, defined as being one with her husband, gave up her name, and virtually all her property came under her husband's control.
During the early history of the United States, a man virtually owned his wife and children as he did his material possessions. If a poor man chose to send his children to the poorhouse, the mother was legally defenseless to object. Some communities, however, modified the common law to allow women to act as lawyers in the courts, to sue for property, and to own property in their own names if their husbands agreed.
Equity law, which developed in England, emphasized the principle of equal rights rather than tradition. Equity law had a liberalizing effect upon the legal rights of women in the United States. For instance, a woman could sue her husband. Mississippi in 1839, followed by New York in 1848 and Massachusetts in 1854, passed laws allowing married women to own property separate from their husbands. In divorce law, however, generally the divorced husband kept legal control of both children and property.
In the 19th century, women began working outside their homes in large numbers, notably in textile mills and garment shops. In poorly ventilated, crowded rooms women (and children) worked for as long as 12 hours a day. Great Britain passed a ten-hour-day law for women and children in 1847, but in the United States it was not until the 1910s that the states began to pass legislation limiting working hours and improving working conditions of women and children.
Eventually, however, some of these labor laws were seen as restricting the rights of working women. For instance, laws prohibiting women from working more than an eight-hour day or from working at night effectively prevented women from holding many jobs, particularly supervisory positions, that might require overtime work. Laws in some states prohibited women from lifting weights above a certain amount—varying from as little as 15 pounds (7 kilograms)—again barring women from many jobs.
During the 1960s several federal laws improving the economic status of women were passed. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 required equal wages for men and women doing equal work. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination against women by any company with 25 or more employees. A Presidential Executive Order in 1967 prohibited bias against women in hiring by federal government contractors.
But discrimination in other fields persisted. Many retail stores would not issue independent credit cards to married women. Divorced or single women often found it difficult to obtain credit to purchase a house or a car. Laws concerned with welfare, crime, prostitution, and abortion also displayed a bias against women. In possible violation of a woman's right to privacy, for example, a mother receiving government welfare payments was subject to frequent investigations in order to verify her welfare claim. Sex discrimination in the definition of crimes existed in some areas of the United States. A woman who shot and killed her husband would be accused of homicide, but the shooting of a wife by her husband could be termed a “passion shooting.” Only in 1968, for another example, did the Pennsylvania courts void a state law which required that any woman convicted of a felony be sentenced to the maximum punishment prescribed by law. Often women prostitutes were prosecuted although their male customers were allowed to go free. In most states abortion was legal only if the mother's life was judged to be physically endangered. In 1973, however, the United States Supreme Court ruled that states could not restrict a woman's right to an abortion in her first three months of pregnancy.
Until well into the 20th century, women in Western European countries lived under many of the same legal disabilities as women in the United States. For example, until 1935, married women in England did not have the full right to own property and to enter into contracts on a par with unmarried women. Only after 1920 was legislation passed to provide working women with employment opportunities and pay equal to men. Not until the early 1960s was a law passed that equalized pay scales for men and women in the British civil service.

Women at Work

In colonial America, women who earned their own living usually became seamstresses or kept boardinghouses. But some women worked in professions and jobs available mostly to men. There were women doctors, lawyers, preachers, teachers, writers, and singers. By the early 19th century, however, acceptable occupations for working women were limited to factory labor or domestic work. Women were excluded from the professions, except for writing and teaching.
The medical profession is an example of changed attitudes in the 19th and 20th centuries about what was regarded as suitable work for women. Prior to the 1800s there were almost no medical schools, and virtually any enterprising person could practice medicine. Indeed, obstetrics was the domain of women.
Beginning in the 19th century, the required educational preparation, particularly for the practice of medicine, increased. This tended to prevent many young women, who married early and bore many children, from entering professional careers. Although home nursing was considered a proper female occupation, nursing in hospitals was done almost exclusively by men. Specific discrimination against women also began to appear. For example, the American Medical Association, founded in 1847, barred women from membership. Barred also from attending “men's” medical colleges, women enrolled in their own—for instance, the Female Medical College of Pennsylvania, which was established in 1850. By the 1910s, however, women were attending many leading medical schools, and in 1915 the American Medical Association began to admit women members.
In 1890, women constituted about 5 percent of the total doctors in the United States. During the 1980s the proportion was about 17 percent. At the same time the percentage of women doctors was about 19 percent in West Germany and 20 percent in France. In Israel, however, about 32 percent of the total number of doctors and dentists were women.
Women also had not greatly improved their status in other professions. In 1930 about 2 percent of all American lawyers and judges were women—in 1989, about 22 percent. In 1930 there were almost no women engineers in the United States. In 1989 the proportion of women engineers was only 7.5 percent.
In contrast, the teaching profession was a large field of employment for women. In the late 1980s more than twice as many women as men taught in elementary and high schools. In higher education, however, women held only about one third of the teaching positions, concentrated in such fields as education, social service, home economics, nursing, and library science. A small proportion of women college and university teachers were in the physical sciences, engineering, agriculture, and law.
The great majority of women who work are still employed in clerical positions, factory work, retail sales, and service jobs. Secretaries, bookkeepers, and typists account for a large portion of women clerical workers. Women in factories often work as machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors. Many women in service jobs work as waitresses, cooks, hospital attendants, cleaning women, and hairdressers.
During wartime women have served in the armed forces. In the United States during World War II almost 300,000 women served in the Army and Navy, performing such noncombatant jobs as secretaries, typists, and nurses. Many European women fought in the underground resistance movements during World War II. In Israel women are drafted into the armed forces along with men and receive combat training.
Women constituted more than 45 percent of employed persons in the United States in 1989, but they had only a small share of the decision-making jobs. Although the number of women working as managers, officials, and other administrators has been increasing, in 1989 they were outnumbered about 1.5 to 1 by men. Professional women did not get the important assignments and promotions given to their male colleagues. Many cases before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 1970 were registered by women charging sex discrimination in jobs.

Gender Wage Gap.

Despite the Equal Pay Act of 1963, women in 1970 were paid about 45 percent less than men for the same jobs. But, since 1979, wages for female workers had been steadily increasing, and by 1993, the average pay of women was about 77 percent of the average pay of men in the workforce. However, the gap between the respective wages of men and women widened by two percent during the four-year period from 1993 to 1997. Many economists saw the increase as a by-product of welfare reform that has pushed a large number of unskilled laborers into the workforce. Some economists argued that the increase in demand for jobs would drive wages among unskilled workers down by as much as 12 percent, and the wage decrease would be felt the hardest among women workers, who made up the majority of the unskilled working pool.
Working women often faced discrimination on the mistaken belief that, because they were married or would most likely get married, they would not be permanent workers. But married women generally continued on their jobs for many years and were not a transient, temporary, or undependable work force. From 1960 to the early 1970s the influx of married women workers accounted for almost half of the increase in the total labor force, and working wives were staying on their jobs longer before starting families. The number of elderly working also increased markedly.
Since 1960 more and more women with children have been in the work force. This change is especially dramatic for married women with children under age 6: 12 percent worked in 1950, 45 percent in 1980, and 57 percent in 1987. Just over half the mothers with children under age 3 were in the labor force in 1987. Black women with children are more likely to work than are white or Hispanic women who have children. Over half of all black families with children are maintained by the mother only, compared with 18 percent of white families with children.
Despite their increased presence in the work force, most women still have primary responsibility for housework and family care. In the late 1970s men with an employed wife spent only about 1.4 hours a week more on household tasks than those whose wife was a full-time homemaker.
A crucial issue for many women is maternity leave, or time off from their jobs after giving birth. By federal law a full-time worker is entitled to time off and a job when she returns, but few states by the early 1990s required that the leave be paid. Many countries, including Mexico, India, Germany, Brazil, and Australia require companies to grant 12-week maternity leaves at full pay.

Women in Politics

American women have had the right to vote since 1920, but their political roles have been minimal. Not until 1984 did a major party choose a woman—Geraldine Ferraro of New York—to run for vice-president (see Ferraro, Geraldine).
Jeanette Rankin of Montana, elected in 1916, was the first woman member of the United States House of Representatives. In 1968 Shirley Chisholm of New York was the first black woman elected to the House of Representatives (see Chisholm, Shirley). Hattie Caraway of Arkansas—first appointed in 1932—was, in 1933, the first woman elected to the United States Senate. Senator Margaret Chase Smith served Maine for 24 years (1949–73). By the mid-1990s there were eight female senators, four of whom won election in 1992 alone.
Wives of former governors became the first women governors—Miriam A. Ferguson of Texas (1925–27 and 1933–35) and Nellie Tayloe Ross of Wyoming (1925–27) (see Ross, Nellie Tayloe). In 1974 Ella T. Grasso of Connecticut won a governorship in her own right.
In 1971 Patience Sewell Latting was elected mayor of Oklahoma City, at that time the largest city in the nation with a woman mayor. By 1979 two major cities were headed by women: Chicago, by Jane Byrne, and San Francisco, by Dianne Feinstein. Sharon Pratt Dixon was elected mayor of Washington, D.C., in 1990.
Frances Perkins was the first woman Cabinet member as secretary of labor under President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Oveta Culp Hobby was secretary of health, education, and welfare in the Dwight D. Eisenhower Cabinet. Carla A. Hills was secretary of housing and urban development in Gerald R. Ford's Cabinet. Jimmy Carter chose two women for his original Cabinet—Juanita M. Kreps as secretary of commerce and Patricia Roberts Harris, first as secretary of health and human services, then as secretary of housing and urban development. Harris was the first African American woman in a presidential Cabinet. When the separate Department of Education was created, Carter named Shirley M. Hufstedler to head it. Ronald Reagan's Cabinet included Margaret M. Heckler, secretary of health and human services, and Elizabeth Hanford Dole, secretary of transportation. Under George Bush, Dole became secretary of labor; she was succeeded by Representative Lynn Martin.
In 1981 Sandra Day O'Connor was appointed the first woman on the United States Supreme Court (see O'Connor, Sandra Day). President Bill Clinton named Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the court in 1993. The next year Bertha Wilson was named to the Canadian Supreme Court. In 1984 Jeanne Sauvé became Canada's first female governor-general (see Sauvé, Jeanne).
In international affairs, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed to the United Nations in 1945 and served as chairman of its Commission on Human Rights (see Roosevelt, Eleanor). Eugenie Anderson was sent to Denmark in 1949 as the first woman ambassador from the United States. Jeane Kirkpatrick was named ambassador to the United Nations in 1981.
Three women held their countries' highest elective offices by 1970. Sirimavo Bandaranaike was prime minister of Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) from 1960 to 1965 and from 1970 to 1977 (see Bandaranaike, Sirimavo). Indira Gandhi was prime minister of India from 1966 to 1977 and from 1980 until her assassination in 1984 (see Gandhi, Indira). Golda Meir was prime minister of Israel from 1969 to 1974 (see Meir, Golda). The first woman head of state in the Americas was Juan Perón's widow, Isabel, president of Argentina in 1974–76. Elisabeth Domitien was premier of the Central African Republic in 1975–76. Margaret Thatcher, who first became prime minister of Great Britain in 1979, held office longer than any other British leader of the 20th century (see Thatcher, Margaret). Also in 1979, Simone Weil of France became the first president of the European Parliament. In the early 1980s Vigdis Finnbogadóttir became president of Iceland; Gro Harlem Brundtland, prime minister of Norway; and Milka Planinc, premier of Yugoslavia. In 1986 Corazon Aquino became president of the Philippines (see Aquino, Corazon). From 1988 to 1990 Benazir Bhutto was prime minister of Pakistan—the first woman to head a Muslim nation. She again held that office in the 1990s (see Bhutto, Benazir).
In 1990 Mary Robinson was elected president of Ireland and Violeta Chamorro, of Nicaragua. Australia's first female premier was Carmen Lawrence (1990), and Canada's was Rita Johnston (1991). In 1991 Khaleda Zia became the prime minister of Bangladesh and Socialist Edith Cresson was named France's first female premier. Poland's first female prime minister, Hanna Suchocka, was elected in 1992.

Feminist Philosophies

At the end of the 18th century, individual liberty was being hotly debated. In 1789, during the French Revolution, Olympe de Gouges published a ‘Declaration of the Rights of Woman' to protest the revolutionists' failure to mention women in their ‘Declaration of the Rights of Man'. In ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman' (1792), Mary Wollstonecraft called for enlightenment of the female mind.
Margaret Fuller, one of the earliest female reporters, wrote ‘Woman in the Nineteenth Century' in 1845. She argued that individuals had unlimited capacities and that when people's roles were defined according to their sex, human development was severely limited.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton was a leading theoretician of the women's rights movement. Her ‘Woman's Bible', published in parts in 1895 and 1898, attacked what she called the male bias of the Bible. Contrary to most of her religious female colleagues, she believed further that organized religion would have to be abolished before true emancipation for women could be achieved. (See also Stanton, Elizabeth Cady.)
Charlotte Perkins Gilman characterized the home as inefficient compared with the mass-production techniques of the modern factory. She contended, in books like ‘Women and Economics' (1898), that women should share the tasks of homemaking, with the women best suited to cook, to clean, and to care for young children doing each respective task.
Politically, many feminists believed that a cooperative society based on socialist economic principles would respect the rights of women. The Socialist Labor party, in 1892, was one of the first national political parties in the United States to include woman suffrage as a plank in its platform.
During the early 20th century the term new woman came to be used in the popular press. More young women than ever were going to school, working both in blue- and white-collar jobs, and living by themselves in city apartments. Some social critics feared that feminism, which they interpreted to mean the end of the home and family, was triumphing. Actually, the customary habits of American women were changing little. Although young people dated more than their parents did and used the automobile to escape parental supervision, most young women still married and became the traditional housewives and mothers.

Women in Reform Movements

Women in the United States during the 19th century organized and participated in a great variety of reform movements—to improve education, to initiate prison reform, to ban alcoholic drinks, and, during the pre-Civil War period, to free the slaves.
At a time when it was not considered respectable for women to speak before mixed audiences of men and women, the abolitionist sisters Sarah and Angelina Grimké of South Carolina boldly spoke out against slavery at public meetings (see Grimké Sisters). Some male abolitionists—including William Lloyd Garrison, Wendell Phillips, and Frederick Douglass—supported the right of women to speak and participate equally with men in antislavery activities. In one instance, women delegates to the World's Anti-Slavery Convention held in London in 1840 were denied their places. Garrison thereupon refused his own seat and joined the women in the balcony as a spectator.
Some women saw parallels between the position of women and that of the slaves. In their view, both were expected to be passive, cooperative, and obedient to their master-husbands. Women such as Stanton, Lucy Stone, Lucretia Mott, Harriet Tubman, and Sojourner Truth were feminists and abolitionists, believing in both the rights of women and the rights of blacks. (See also individual biographies.)
Many women supported the temperance movement in the belief that drunken husbands pulled their families into poverty. In 1872 the Prohibition party became the first national political party to recognize the right of suffrage for women in its platform. Frances Willard helped found the Woman's Christian Temperance Union (see Willard, Frances).
During the mid-1800s Dorothea Dix was a leader in the movements for prison reform and for providing mental-hospital care for the needy. The settlement-house movement was inspired by Jane Addams, who founded Hull House in Chicago in 1889, and by Lillian Wald, who founded the Henry Street Settlement House in New York City in 1895. Both women helped immigrants adjust to city life. (See also Addams; Dix.)
Women were also active in movements for agrarian and labor reforms and for birth control. Mary Elizabeth Lease, a leading Populist spokeswoman in the 1880s and 1890s in Kansas, immortalized the cry, “What the farmers need to do is raise less corn and more hell.” Margaret Robins led the National Women's Trade Union League in the early 1900s. In the 1910s Margaret Sanger crusaded to have birth-control information available for all women (see Sanger).

Fighting for the Vote

The first women's rights convention took place in Seneca Falls, N.Y., in July 1848. The declaration that emerged was modeled after the Declaration of Independence. Written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, it claimed that “all men and women are created equal” and that “the history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman.” Following a long list of grievances were resolutions for equitable laws, equal educational and job opportunities, and the right to vote.
With the Union victory in the Civil War, women abolitionists hoped their hard work would result in suffrage for women as well as for blacks. But the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution, adopted in 1868 and 1870 respectively, granted citizenship and suffrage to blacks but not to women.
Disagreement over the next steps to take led to a split in the women's rights movement in 1869. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, a temperance and antislavery advocate, formed the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) in New York. Lucy Stone organized the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA) in Boston. The NWSA agitated for a woman-suffrage amendment to the Federal Constitution, while the AWSA worked for suffrage amendments to each state constitution. Eventually, in 1890, the two groups united as the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA). Lucy Stone became chairman of the executive committee and Elizabeth Cady Stanton served as the first president. Susan B. Anthony, Carrie Chapman Catt, and Dr. Anna Howard Shaw served as later presidents.
The struggle to win the vote was slow and frustrating. Wyoming Territory in 1869, Utah Territory in 1870, and the states of Colorado in 1893 and Idaho in 1896 granted women the vote but the Eastern states resisted. A woman-suffrage amendment to the Federal Constitution, presented to every Congress since 1878, repeatedly failed to pass.
When the United States entered World War I in April 1917, the NAWSA pledged its support. Thousands of suffragists folded bandages in their local headquarters and volunteered to work in hospitals and government offices. The suffrage leaders hoped that after the war American women would be rewarded with the vote for their patriotic efforts.
Some feminist leaders split with the NAWSA over its support of the war. Alice Paul led the Congressional Union for Women's Suffrage, later called the National Woman's party, in agitating for the vote during the war. Another group, the New York branch of the Woman's Peace party, led by Crystal Eastman, refused to support the war “to make the world safe for democracy” when American women did not have democratic rights. The national Woman's Peace party, headed by Jane Addams, supported a peace settlement but did not openly oppose the war.
Congress finally passed the women's suffrage bill in June 1919, and the 19th Amendment to the Constitution became law on Aug. 26, 1920. Some 25 million women had won the right to vote. Following the suffrage victory, NAWSA members transferred their allegiance to the newly created League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to educating women on political issues. The National Woman's party worked toward an amendment to the Constitution providing complete equality of rights for women. The Woman's Peace party became affiliated with another pacifist group, the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.
In Great Britain, as in the United States, woman-suffrage workers divided into two camps—the moderate National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies and the militant Women's Social and Political Union, led by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters Christabel and Sylvia. A bill conferring suffrage on women over 30 was passed by the British Parliament in 1918. Ten years later the age limit was lowered to 21. Meanwhile, New Zealand had granted full suffrage in 1893, and Australia in 1902.
Women had won full suffrage in Finland in 1906 and in Norway in 1913 and were voting in most countries by the time World War II broke out. In 1945, Japanese women received the right to vote. Women voted for the first time in France in 1945. Women in Italy won the right to vote in 1946.

Rise of Women's Liberation

The suffrage victory of 1920 in the United States led to a long period of relative calm in the pursuit of full equality for women. It was not until the 1960s that the feminist philosophy again gained both a significant group of spokeswomen and an audience.
In 1963 Betty Friedan's book ‘The Feminine Mystique' observed that many college-educated women did not use their training but remained in their homes resigned to being housewives. In 1966 she organized the National Organization for Women (NOW). NOW agitated for such improvements as child-care centers for professional women who wished to return to work. NOW members lectured, lobbied in Congress, and filed legal suits against sex discrimination.
Around 1967, NOW workers who were impatient for decisive and bold changes, along with young college women and radical activists, began forming a variety of new groups such as SALT (Sisters All Learning Together), WITCH (Women's International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell), Bread and Roses, and the Women's Liberation Union. Some merely held meetings to discuss their problems and fears. Others worked for consciousness raising, more liberal abortion laws, and the passage of an equal rights amendment to the Constitution. Still others identified with the Marxist and black revolutionary movements. Some women's liberationists were openly hostile to men, viewing them as the oppressors of women and denouncing them for regarding women solely as sexual objects. But most wanted relationships between men and women that were based upon mutual respect.
Interest in the women's liberation movement became widespread. Television talk shows and popular magazines featured discussions by articulate feminists on the need for deep reforms in American society. In 1970 a doctoral dissertation by Kate Millett became the best-selling book ‘Sexual Politics'.
Both 19th- and 20th-century feminists believed that women should be judged as individuals, as men are, and that personal rewards should be based on personal achievement. They wanted women to have roles separate from those of wife and mother—just as men had roles separate from those of husband and father. For example, many worked for the ordination of women to be priests, pastors, and rabbis.
New considerations entered into the feminist perspective of the 1960s and 1970s. Increased and more accurate knowledge of birth control, including the use of contraceptives and abortion, gave women greater control over their own destinies.
A Women's Decade, 1975–85, began with the International Women's Year (IWY) observed during 1975. Some 10,000 delegates from 123 nations participated in an IWY conference in Mexico City. Many women's groups in the 1980s turned their attention to such economic issues as the “feminization of poverty,” noting that families maintained by women accounted for nearly half of all poor families. In 1991 the televised Anita Hill–Clarence Thomas Senate hearings on allegations of sexual harassment helped focus public attention on the issues of power in the workplace. Despite gains, many women and minorities found that a so-called glass ceiling, another name for discrimination, held them back from attaining promotions.
In 1968 the National Women's Hall of Fame was established in Seneca Falls, N.Y. The Women's Rights National Historic Park was set aside there in 1980 (see National Parks, “United States National Parks”)
["Satisfaction is death of Struggle"]
[Naseer Ahmed Chandio]
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Naseer Ahmed Chandio For This Useful Post:
farrukh zaman (Sunday, July 21, 2013), pisceankhan (Wednesday, August 13, 2014)
Old Friday, March 30, 2007
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mahwashajaz is on a distinguished road

Do people actually write these extensive piths and boulders of information? Isn't this more like a report from a department of women rights rather than an Essay?
Reply With Quote
Old Monday, April 02, 2007
Gone's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lahore
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gone is on a distinguished road

Itni lambi report to parhnay ko dil hi nahi chahta Naseer Bhai. But I hope it must be a good one.
Reply With Quote
Old Monday, April 02, 2007
prieti's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 750
Thanks: 267
Thanked 327 Times in 170 Posts
prieti has a spectacular aura aboutprieti has a spectacular aura aboutprieti has a spectacular aura about

@naser bhai

thanks a lot for this stuff...i really needed it for my current studies....this addition wil help me a lot....plz share if u hav some more related material....

A Man Would Do Nothing,
If He Waited Until He
Could Do It So Well
That No One Would Find Fault
With What He Has Done.
Reply With Quote
Old Monday, April 02, 2007
Sureshlasi's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: Best Moderator Award: Awarded for censoring all swearing and keeping posts in order. - Issue reason: Best ModMember of the Year: Awarded to those community members who have made invaluable contributions to the Community in the particular year - Issue reason: For the year 2007Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: پاکستان
Posts: 2,282
Thanks: 483
Thanked 3,082 Times in 760 Posts
Sureshlasi is a name known to allSureshlasi is a name known to allSureshlasi is a name known to allSureshlasi is a name known to allSureshlasi is a name known to allSureshlasi is a name known to all

@ NAseer Chandio sahab

In CSS 2007 essay paper one of the topic was related to above scenario "10- The state of women rights in Pakistan". Those who had read this report they surely will have got benefit . However we are thankful of u for such fruitful contribution and expecting your support in future as well.

Take care.
ஜ иστнιπg ιš ιмթΘรรιвlε тσ α ωιℓℓιиg нєαят ஜ
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: sumwhere
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Hedonist is on a distinguished road

Well.... it is a very good effort but one must be an optimistic,if we trace the history of ancient times,even in the 5th and 6th centuries when it was time of the great byzantines and babylonians,women had solid position and secured rights... she was far from being a chattel. later on during the jahiliya periods of Arabian races, she was degraded. secondly i would like to say that " jo log kal iss mulk ki tareekh likhney jarahey hain un mein itna sabr aur hosla hona chaiye k khanda peshani se koi bhi comment sunein bashartye k uss mein galat language use na ki gai ho" where is the true spirit of democracy?.......jiss ne bhi iss assignment k against comment diya hai aap bajaey remedial measures talash karney key usko ban kar rahey hain.... ghaltion ki islah ka yehi moqa hai....iss qoum ko jazbatiat k dharey mein behney waley log chaiye hotey to pakistan sab se agey hota aj kamyabi k raston per. this soil needs mature minded and patient people. regards
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Silent Spectator's Avatar
Assistant Commissioner BCS (EB)
PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: BPSC B-17 - 2017
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quetta
Posts: 961
Thanks: 83
Thanked 738 Times in 421 Posts
Silent Spectator is just really niceSilent Spectator is just really niceSilent Spectator is just really niceSilent Spectator is just really niceSilent Spectator is just really nice
Thumbs down

Well done chandio, but i don't think so that an essay like above will be written in 3 hours.
For me it is same as reading the complete dawn news paper of sunday!!!
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Posts: n/a

Dear Naseer its a good but fruitless thing you have provided, what sureshlasi has said is pointless and absurd, that essay which came was totally related to Pakistan and this report by no means gives any supporting arguments to that essay or any Pakistani women rights essay. The data provided here is all US based having link with Pakistani environment. Time and again its said by me that only prepare the stuff which you can retain in the paper, you have to have data of 8 to 10 essays how can u keep such info in your mind, it would slip away and false info can get u failed.

If you have provided this report just for the sake of general knowledge then i appreciate your effort but then why did you paste anything regarding men's rights and the gender discrimination against men ?????? One should be neutral in all respects.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Islamic Doc Predator Islam 43 Thursday, June 28, 2018 08:07 AM
The State of Women Rights in Pakistan from 2007 Essay Paper secondopinion02 Essays 16 Monday, September 17, 2007 08:48 PM
Women In Pakistan Mystichina Essays 3 Wednesday, September 05, 2007 08:23 PM
Human Rights Naseer Ahmed Chandio International Relations 0 Thursday, December 14, 2006 02:10 PM

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of (unless is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.