who wins?
 

Maluna Abu Azad kalam was born in Makkah belonged to sufi family .He said about the division of land is based on being pure and impure .Islam also assures us Muslims are brothers in any part of the world and does not define them as a nation on the base of land . Quaid has championed the cause of Islam by defining them as a nation.In his famous address ,23rd March1940 ,he made it clear Muslim are living together with Hindus for 12 centuries.Foreign powers did not recognise them as a ''nation' but called communities. We are taught Quaid e Azam are founder of pakistan and founded it just to save us from Hindus,Do we think we are safe ?we loose bangladesh and suffered from separatist movenents.Still,Indian threat and kashmir issue is not solved .we fought 4 wars with India without no gain ,but only to loose it!!

Yesterday,potohar province resolution is accepted . If we go back in the era of Lord curzon when he divided india what happened?It was said province was divided for better administration.Bangal was the most literate,developed and rich province of subcontinent .The reason was English people wanted excess to chattagong port which is found in Muslim majority area but being controlled by hindus Traders.Hindus were revolutionary and Muslim were passive because sir syed advised Muslims not to to participate in politics. So If chattagong port was gone in hands of English ,it means all raw industrial and agrarian products would go in hands of Imperislist.The alienation of muslims has caused communal riots ,because U.P muslim police was charged there to control.That,also gave an impression that muslims were with english and did not wanted freedom.

Why partition was annulled?becsuse of Non coopetation of Hindus and they knew how to control their lands.They were following tolstoy policy how to get rid from ImperialistsQuaid left the congress when Muslims started taking part in politics .That was the time of first world war!

[QUOTE=SADIA SHAFIQ;471899]Maluna Abu Azad kalam was born in Makkah belonged to sufi family .He said about the division of land is based on being pure and impure .Islam also assures us Muslims are brothers in any part of the world and does not define them as a nation on the base of land . Quaid has championed the cause of Islam by defining them as a nation.In his famous address ,23rd March1940 ,he made it clear Muslim are living together with Hindus for 12 centuries.Foreign powers did not recognise them as a ''nation' but called communities. We are taught Quaid e Azam are founder of pakistan and founded it just to save us from Hindus,Do we think we are safe ?we loose bangladesh and suffered from separatist movenents.Still,Indian threat and kashmir issue is not solved .we fought 4 wars with India without no gain ,but only to loose it!!

Yesterday,potohar province resolution is accepted . If we go back in the era of Lord curzon when he divided india what happened?It was said province was divided for better administration.Bangal was the most literate,developed and rich province of subcontinent .The reason was English people wanted excess to chattagong port which is found in Muslim majority area but being controlled by hindus Traders.Hindus were revolutionary and Muslim were passive because sir syed advised Muslims not to to participate in politics. So If chattagong port was gone in hands of English ,it means all raw industrial and agrarian products would go in hands of Imperislist.The alienation of muslims has caused communal riots ,because U.P muslim police was charged there to control.That,also gave an impression that muslims were with english and did not wanted freedom.

Why partition was annulled?becsuse of Non coopetation of Hindus and they knew how to control their lands.They were following tolstoy policy how to get rid from ImperialistsQuaid left the congress when Muslims started taking part in politics .That was the time of first world war![/QUOTE]

what is the issue and what do you want to prove? and what this discussion is for?

[QUOTE=sajidnuml;471926]what is the issue and what do you want to prove? and what this discussion is for?[/QUOTE]

This is related to PA. Questions are tricky when we go for exams.Aligarh movement is pioneered by Jinnah and future prospect was defined by mollana abu Azad kalam.I have highlighted the policy of English who governed on the policy of divide,If question is asked bangal should be divided ,if yes then comment it in the light of present scenario of pakistsan's political chaos.Questions in PA will be asked in the light of curtent situation with critical analysis.India at the time of Brtitish Raj was in transitional stage (Imperialism into democracy). Pakistsn ,infact does 'nt have developed democratic society.The MPA's and MNA's are working on the style of English lords.Bureaucracy needs improvement .Educational system is divided into three types.so we are able to manage pakisan domestic as well as Int. AFFAIRS! Kashmir problem is suspended .There are separatist movements in Balochiastan and we loose bangla.so This pakistsn is envisioned by our founders or mollana Azad well defined the implications of pakistan creation in his book 'lndia wins freedom''.? This is the question .