|
Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only. |
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
is china taking us for granted
The foreign policy of super powers is never based on sentiments but, Pakistan and china do an overt show of metaphoric interpretations for our relations. Is it really higher than mountains and sweeter than honey.
Improved relatiions between china and india with former investing heavily in latter's rail road and other infrastructure programmes have resulted in two-way commerce totalling close to $70 billion. Wouldn't it soften the chinese stance on kashmir issue, which is right now in favour of Pakistan. Also, many believe that china is hijacking Pakistan's resources in guise of freindship. how much weight does this arument hold Does Pakistan need to revisit its relationship with China in changing scenarios. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
My Comment ...
Quote:
Well, I don`t think there is any other super power besides USA at state level at present in action Plus,A post is there on this forum , probably i have posted i think, check it out, in that post the dark side of the foreign policy only of USA, the super power, has been given a shine to its dark side. 1. Iraq`s WMD case and US attack without Security Council`s approval is is what shows the element of being sentimental US. 2. Central Asia over all Vs USA..what you think about that. 3. Palestine`s scenario, Israel backed up by USA having unlawful occupation there over the last 35/6 years . Is that what the UN maintains in its charter. 4. Why Hamid Karzai sahab is disliked by most of the citizens of Afghanistan and what bout the declared pre-plan of Taliban(s) for post-US Afghanistan . 5. Iran scenario and the sanctions against Iran ..making mess of the economy of a shia state iran.. See, after a country like Pakistan without flaunting which became "Atomic/nuclear Power"...faced any resistence from USA..obviously not..what you mean by sentimentality when Iran a state who seeks a outlet to become nuclear state..who creates the obstacle they are facing..Is not USA. European Union etc. How can you prove that F.Policy the Super Power(s), (USA), is based on sentimentality, my brother. The approach to foreign policy of USA has been discussed in my that concerned post, emphasizing that there is element of hostility in the foreign policy of USA, making its approach hostile towards its foreign policy. Many analysts say that the Tragedy of 9/11 came as a gift to west.and since that time onward an uncontrollable turmoil is on..is there any obvious chance of harmony for the world without a diplomatic approach to foreign policies of the states which most have rare proportions of. And American foreign policy is not only for Muslim states which the analyst advertise as clash of civilizations. Or others as global village where the dominant culture is of west mostly having roots from that super power`s culture, which is materialistic, feminine,secular and unbalanced. Brother , what do you mean by based on hostility, I maintain when the western secular culture and US is trying to overtake the divinity oriented culture of the pure religion of Islam, with lost of hostile element in the foreign policy of USA..and that's the cause why we see turmoil..brother... The global peace and the call of today`s world for safety and security is not possible without a culture with fragrance of divinity. Is not the the west trying to find out change for there peace..they want But don`t find out the inlet the need which they are blocking actually... My brother, Why the singers of USA like Kat Steven become Yosuf Islam(s). 6. And What about Syria, Lebanon and other Muslim countries..why they are target of the US foreign policy....how come, its not the US foreign policy..which has the elements of hostility against the real natural chronic discreteness which the west and US needs but yet they are blind what they really need to give a way to what they need. Absorb what the reality is, My Brother. And much after all ,the global scnerio shows like the UNO should instead sign up for the membership of USA ..a country with false approach towards foreign policy, world is in dis-order brother. ..America is hard Super Power.. utilizing hostile approach towards its foreign policy mostly. Is not it ..Answer is yes..If the major part of that foreign policy and been busy in hostility, how can one avoid that such an approach towards foreign policy is wrong/false..I don`t think its makes one stop not to call it having hostile and false approach towards its foreign policy.. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Regards Brother... Regards Brother..
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts" Winston Churchill |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Pakistan sure can revisit its relationship with China but addition of another uncooperative rather offensive neighbour would not be a good sign. We already have strained relations with 3 of our 4 neighbours. Do you know what is China's stance on Kashmir? It is already softened and tilts toward favouring India. China has captured Aksai-Chin and UN plebiscite cannot happen unless military presence by China is withdrawn from there to represent the region as it was at the time of passing of the UN resolution. China's policy favors the issue to be resolved bilaterally, and that is also India's stance not Pakistan's!
__________________
He that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow (Ecclesiastes 1:18) |
The Following User Says Thank You to Buddha For This Useful Post: | ||
mysterious me (Friday, October 24, 2014) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The cheap Chinese products have flooded our markets and in turn wiped out our domestic industry. Pak and China are not in love with each other rather they are in need of each other and it seems China has benefited more from this relation owing to their diplomatic skills.The impact of their manipulation or diplomacy can be guaged from the fact that majority in Pakistan look towards China as a saviour although the ground realities are exactly contrary to that.we could've exploited the dissent among China and India to our own interest by pitching more astute and dynamic diplomatic skills!
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to usmanwrites For This Useful Post: | ||
Asif3531 (Friday, October 24, 2014), mysterious me (Friday, October 24, 2014), Riaz Solangi (Friday, October 24, 2014) |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
yes , we see the colour of bus relationship dominant between the two countries..tho not strictly...factor arms needs some focus too.. Quote:
Quote:
Pakistan and China both needs a counter balance to USA & India...And the frame of most affairs between quad-lateral relationship Quote:
confusing ,if you can explain please??? Pakistan needs more diplomatic glace-over its foreign policy to alleviate the strain you talking about, , Pakistan needs to be more strenuous itself, and that capability has almost no concern with china. As you said.. Quote:
Quote:
note:focus on the motives and reasons of "China siezed Aksai-Chin" Regards
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts" Winston Churchill |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
i think both countries have their own interests
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Dear, china is Nothing against Usa. Usa is a big market for Chines Products if USa Stop Importing their products then china will become more Poor
__________________
Success is simple. Do what's right, the right way, at the right time. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Although both countries are interdependent on economic front yet considerable amount of dissent is observed in their political arena.US arms enemies of China and is circling China through Asia-Pacific policy, China knows it and that's why it is investing heavily in it's defence capabilities.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My Dear..
Is this "Fighting Forum" or "Conversations Forum"
And develop your sense then it will work.Thanks.
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts" Winston Churchill |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IR E-Notes and E-Books | Asif Yousufzai | International Relations | 50 | Wednesday, November 26, 2014 02:03 PM |
The News: Political Economy: Opinion & Analysis | redmax | News & Articles | 413 | Tuesday, February 11, 2014 03:40 PM |
All about World | Sureshlasi | International Relations | 12 | Saturday, May 30, 2009 08:41 PM |
Text of Pak China Joint Statement | Princess Royal | News & Articles | 0 | Friday, October 17, 2008 12:25 PM |
Islam in China | samreen | Islamiat | 0 | Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:00 AM |