Wednesday, October 04, 2023
10:29 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles

News & Articles Here you can share News and Articles that you consider important for the exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sunday, January 13, 2019
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Karachi
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
rasalkhan is on a distinguished road
Default Revamping economy, an uphill task for PTI government

Pakistan Tehreek -e-Insaaf (PTI) governmentfrom its day 1 in the office is facing an almost empty national kitty. The depleted treasury was a planned one by the outgoing Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) to fail the new government or was a national disaster made due to wrong policies of now fugitive former federal minister Ishaq Dar is yet to be determined.

However, the fact remains that revamping the national economy remained an uphill task for the PTI’s government since its inception and continues to be so till date despite untiring efforts by economic manager Asad Umar.

The first challenge PTI’s government faced was meeting the salary bill of the federal government employees and latest is devaluation of rupee which has increased Pakistan’s debt to a burgeoning unmanageable proportion.

PTI’s chief Imran Khan in his speeches at public meeting has vowed to break the begging bowl, opposed loans from International Monetary Fund (IMF) and said he would prefer starvation over seeking loans.

The weakening economy due to a volatile Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX), rupee devalution, decreasing confidence of foreign investors and flight of capital from the country forced the Imran led PTI government to approach IMF for a bail out pacakage.

In somewhat of a ritual, Pakistan was once again back at the doorsteps of international creditors like it went to the IMF after every election 2008, 2013 and now 2018. This time the request for financial assistance is expected to be the largest ever matching a huge trade deficit.

The ever increasing circular debt was another recurring night mare for the managers of the economy.

The advantages given to the IPP’s (Independent Power Producers) by the previous government of PPP and PML-N, the increased dependence on imported LNG and lately RLNG in view of depleting natural gas reserves, the faulty policy for import of furnace oil also added to the economic turmoil.

The tax collection by FBR also suffered as PTI government attempted to cut down the huge import bill particularly of costly un-necessary items classic example of which is “ cheese “ . The shrunken tax purse also hurt the new government which has planned for a big success to win more support for PTI.

IMF met the request by Pakistan with a stone cold “ delay “ to dictate more strict terms, the acceptance of which would mean a political suicide or in less unfavourable response, losing public support.

PTI in view of luke warm response from IMF found another way out and requested China, its most trusted friend and CPEC partner for a bailout package followed by similar request to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The response was more re-assuring and relieved the new inexperienced rulers which visibly had a breather, ample time to re-direct the economic policies, to overcome huge trade imbalance and to develop the economy on the basis of exact value of rupee.

The strengthened economy has re-infused confidence in federal finance minister who recently in a meeting with businessmen of Karachi has announced to unveil second mini budget on Jan 23.

His recipe for economic correction include more taxes on imports, no tax within and incentives for stock exchange and exporters.

Taxing the agriculture, the biggest business again escapes tax imposition. The entire nation has started a countdown for Jan 23 hoping “ good news “ as assured by Finance Minister Asad Umer.

PML-N and PPP, the two major opposition parties have already started scathing criticism regarding mini budget but the nation understands well that “ extra-ordinary steps are needed in extra-ordinary situations “ and there exists an extra ordinary situation as national economy needs an overhaul.
Reply With Quote
Old Monday, February 04, 2019
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Karachi
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Perviano is on a distinguished road
Smile Revamping Economy

No doubt in the fact that Revamping economy is an uphill task for PTI government, the one primary suggestion for them is to focus bit more in I.T sector as so many areas from where they can generate revenues for the country economy.
As we all know and can see the influence of internet and technology on our lives changing the business paradigm as well. Even normal people are contributing huge amounts to economy like freelancers. On other side online shopping in Pakistan is becoming a huge industry etc. Government should pay more attention to this area to make it more developed. I my self is from this industry and seeking more developments as I am running an infotainment website.
Reply With Quote
Old Monday, May 27, 2019
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
frenchtruly is on a distinguished road

Reply With Quote
Old Saturday, July 13, 2019
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ZahidaliKhan is on a distinguished road

These investment flows together with the US aid seem to have convinced the current establishment that Pakistan does not really need a real democracy and the rule of law.
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday, July 13, 2019
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ZahidaliKhan is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by I M Possible View Post
Why poverty refuses to fade away

By Izzud-Din Pal

THE issue of poverty has been receiving considerable attention in the media for several years, especially since the policy for macroeconomic stabilisation was implemented by the government. While the emphasis on poverty reduction through growth is still the official policy, neither of the two objectives seems to be showing any progress.

On the question of poverty reduction, there is a serious gap between what the officials claim has been accomplished and the perception and experience of the majority of people about it. The recently released provisional poverty estimates, for example, which claim to show a notable reduction in the number of the poor in the country illustrates my point.

Why should this be the case has been examined extensively in recent commentaries on this subject. The issue does not seem to go away and the official position seems to be to stay the course. There is, therefore, scope for further discussion and examination of the question albeit in a broader perspective. This would underline the challenge that the government is faced with concerning poverty reduction.

The global focus on national poverty is really a new phenomenon. Until recently the poor received attention mainly as a problem of disparity among nations. A direct focus was badly needed, therefore, because, as Michael Harrington, the author of “Other America” often observed in the 1960s, there were poor people in rich countries as there were rich people in poor countries.

The UNDP has done pioneering work in highlighting this phenomenon by producing data on the availability of the basic amenities of life to people in the developing countries. The watershed in the fight against poverty was the Millennium Declaration signed by 189 countries in September 2000. It highlighted the reality of absolute poverty with reference to the developing countries, by using a threshold of minimum income of one dollar a day.

In discussions on international disparities, the focus has been necessarily on relative poverty, perhaps because the developed countries are not faced with a serious problem of people living below the poverty line. It is an important issue but does not properly explore the facts about the state of life of people at the lowest rung of the ladder in income distribution, neither in the developed countries nor the developing ones. In the latter countries it has been associated with the pattern of a traditional society. In many developed countries, especially in North America, the emphasis has been placed on the culture of poverty in the urban areas.

Oscar Lewis, the author of “Five Families” could assure, for example, his readers that poverty was not merely a lack of adequate income, but rather a way life handed down from generation to generation.

In contrast to the culture of poverty, the economists, such as Keith Griffin, emphasise, especially with reference to South Asia, that poverty is a product of some social and economic processes which are intrinsic to the social systems in the developing countries. These economists give considerable attention to the historical facts in which the interests of various classes are often in conflict. The issue, therefore, can be resolved only through structural changes in society.

Whether it is a matter of “culture” of poverty or of unequal access to assets, in a society where both kinds of poverties are a reality, a comparative view of both is necessary in order to draw a meaningful picture about them. They are in a symbiotic relationship, like two blades of scissors. Therefore, to define absolute poverty just in terms of calorie count is an insult to the poor as human beings.

Another aspect of poverty that impinges on our discussion of the concepts of relative and absolute poverty and adds an angle to the question of income distribution is the existence of what is called the working poor. Their portrait is more easily available with reference to the developed countries than the developing countries. In the 19th Century, Charles Dickens described their plight in post-Industrial Revolution England. More recently, Barbara Ehrenreich describes their low-wage existence in the United States in her 2001 bestseller “Nickel and Dimed”. For Pulitzer Prize winning US reporter David R. Shipler, poverty is an interlocking problem, as he describes it in his “The Working Poor”.

In a developing country such as Pakistan, there are the ‘chowkidars’, ‘chaprasis’, the chauffeurs and drivers, and the domestic servants, not to speak of the network of clerks churning out red-tape in their endeavours to keep the “bosses” happy — all fitting into tightly-defined social hierarchies.

This demonstrates that poverty is a very complex issue. It is not just about minimum required money income or measurement of subsistence. It is a matter of poverty of opportunity. One wonders, for example, how many of the working poor end up in their present station in life because they never had an opportunity to develop in accordance with their potential talents.

With its many facets, the issue calls for a comprehensive approach for reduction of poverty. Concerning absolute poverty, it is a difficult challenge to define what average level of income would meet the basic needs of an individual or a household. The basket of goods and services for minimum sustenance may be measured by a common denominator of a dollar a day or some other unit adjusted with national or local norms. But other related issues still need to be kept in view for a full understanding of the situation such as purchasing power as determined by the price level of essential goods.

In this regard, the data about inflationary pressures may be received with reservations if their message does not correspond with the general experience. They may also become out of date because of the time lag between their tabulation and publication.

The concept of relative poverty, as I have mentioned above, underlines the gap between the rich and the poor. Generally, information about the various income groups in a country is divided into the quartiles or deciles in a descending order and inequality among people is measured by means of statistical devices such as Gini Coefficient. There may be variation, however, within the income groups which are covered by their averages. In a country such as Pakistan, for example, it should be of interest to have the average income of the top five per cent available in order to measure the true gap between the rich and the poor.

All the above considerations assume their respective places in the formulation of public policy on this matter. As is well known, the focus of this policy in Pakistan is, in the words of the World Bank, “poverty reduction and growth”. The approach to poverty which has now assumed a hegemonic position in development thinking is a variant of neo-classical position promoted by the World Bank. According to this approach, only the market-led development would reduce poverty in a country. As observed by K.T. Silva and K. Athukorala, the “safety nets for the poor” have only a limited role in this process as long as they do not inhibit the market mechanism (Poverty: a Global View, edited by Else Oyen, S.M. Miller and Abdus Samad, Oslo, 1996).

The conventional wisdom shared by policy makers in Pakistan is that growth is necessary for poverty reduction. It is a vague statement and is open to interpretation. When the time element is added to it, for example, then growth becomes the main target of the policy objective, with distribution playing its role only after growth has reached a certain critical minimum level.

In this formulation, the statement becomes a controversial issue. There is a strong body of opinion among economists that challenges the view that growth should be given priority over redistribution. I have dealt with this issue in my “Economic Growth and Social Choice” (Dawn, Encounter, February 11), and do not wish to repeat my argument here except to emphasise one point: it would make eminent sense that a proper development strategy for a developing country such as Pakistan should focus on both ends of the process of growth. Growth with equity should be the main objective of the state.

The sequential approach to growth was developed in the 1950s with a focus on the role of capital formation in propelling an economy to “unlimited” growth with high mass consumption. For the economy to become self-sustaining, according to the argument, it was necessary to reinvest the surplus in order to expand the potential output. For both capitalists and workers had more to gain by focusing on increase in output, because the latter group would gain from increased material production through the “trickle-down” effect. Kuznet’s analysis of relation between income distribution and growth (the Kuznet’s Curve) provided support for this point of view.

This model was developed against the background of reconstruction of post-Second World War European economy where the challenge was to rebuild with the help of the resources, including entrepreneurship and a large reservoir of skilled labour which were easily accessible within the economy. Such is not the case with a developing country which would need a multifaceted approach to its economy. It takes time to produce educated and skilled manpower and it can only be done by allocating resources simultaneously to this sector, along with other development plans.

The importance of social choice has received further attention as a result of the renewal of interest in the concept of the welfare state. It has a new dimension added to it, that of the relationship between ethics and economics. There is a revival of interest in the contributions of economists such as A.C. Pigou, one of disciples of Alfred Marshall. The starting point of economics, according to this approach, is poverty rather than sophisticated nature of efficiency. The goal of economics should be to relieve human beings from poverty and then to pursue the objective of excellence.

Neither the discipline itself nor the policy makers may be ready to embark upon such a drastic shift in their plans. But the new ideas certainly should encourage us to pause and think about the present state of economic life.

The latest thinking also debunks the assertion that pursuing growth with equitable distribution would unnecessarily slow its pace and might even frustrate both objectives. In light of the above discussion, the following remarks are aimed at the specific situation in Pakistan concerning poverty reduction:

1. In order to devise a meaningful policy, the first important step is to have a system in which an autonomous federal bureau of statistics would make available at regular intervals the results of the household surveys, along with definition of concepts and methodology used. Also, information about income distribution in the country, based on income tax and other related data, would be published regularly.

2. Agriculture, being the largest single sector of the economy, deserves special consideration. In 2002 and 2003, two reports were published which put emphasis on the question of rural poverty in the country. The first report entitled “Pakistan Poverty Assessment: Poverty in Pakistan: Vulnerabilities, Social Gaps and Rural Dynamics” was from the World Bank. The second report was published on behalf of the UNDP and was entitled “Pakistan: National Human Development Report 2003”.

Both reports focus on the important question of poverty reduction, but the differences between the two are striking. Unlike the World Bank report, the UNDP report advocates a deliberate public policy to strengthen the rights of tenants and farmers, to allow them to break out of the nexus of unequal access to assets. In other words, for the market mechanism to work, it is necessary to establish “the safety nets for the poor” through a deliberate public policy.

To the best of my knowledge, the report seems to have assumed the status of an archival material, placed on a shelf along with other such “historical” documents.

3. Taking a broader view of the access to assets for the farmers, a greater recognition of some of the minor crops would present a potential for growth and help the poorer farmers. The Pakistan Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper seems to suggest production of milk as a pro-poor policy, however. There may be good prospects for this kind of endeavour for a prosperous investor but not for the poor whose meagre resources cannot allow them to own enough dairy cattle to become entrepreneurs in milk production.

4. A sound agricultural policy is the backbone of the economy and that includes land reform. It is simply not justified to have more than half of agricultural land owned by less than 5 per cent of the landowners, plus the newly emerging commercial farmers from the military sector. A comprehensive review of agriculture in Pakistan is, therefore, necessary for an agrarian reform in the context of modern time. This point has been emphasised by a vast majority of commentaries on the subject and it can bear repetition. The ruling groups are likely to resist these reforms. What prospects then are there in the near future? Perhaps not very bright.

Reference: 13 May, 2006. Encounter, DAWN.
nice posting btw nice information
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday, October 10, 2019
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: abbottabad
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
daud iqbal is on a distinguished road

pakistan zindabad
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
development of pakistan press since 1947 Janeeta Journalism & Mass Communication 15 Tuesday, May 05, 2020 03:04 AM
European Union Aarwaa Current Affairs Notes 0 Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:34 PM
The Globalization of World Politics: Revision guide 3eBaylis & Smith: hellowahab International Relations 0 Wednesday, October 17, 2007 03:13 PM
Economics an overview Naseer Ahmed Chandio Economics 0 Wednesday, December 13, 2006 09:40 AM
indo-pak relations atifch Current Affairs 0 Monday, December 11, 2006 09:01 PM

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of (unless is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.