Iran Aims 'To Foment Instability,' Gates Says

[Mazher]

Nuclear Program Could Be Restarted, Defense Chief Warns

MANAMA, Bahrain, Dec. 8 -- Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates argued forcefully at a Persian Gulf security conference Saturday that U.S. intelligence indicates Iran could restart its secret nuclear weapons program "at any time" and remains a major threat to the region.
Tough and at times sarcastic, Gates said the Iranian government also is supplying weapons to insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan, backing the radical Islamic movements Hezbollah and Hamas, and developing medium-range ballistic missiles.
"Everywhere you turn, it is the policy of Iran to foment instability and chaos, no matter the strategic value or cost in the blood of innocents," Gates said in a speech to defense leaders from 23 countries attending the Manama Dialogue, a security conference organized by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Gates acknowledged that the recent release of a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, which determined that the country halted its secret nuclear weapons program in 2003, was awkward and frustrating for the Bush administration. He explained that the CIA director decides on the content and release, without influence from Congress or the executive branch.
"The estimate clearly has come at an awkward time. It has annoyed a number of our friends. It has confused our allies around the world in terms of what we're trying to accomplish," he said.
International pressure is the only impediment to Iran restarting its nuclear weapons program, Gates said. "Iran is keeping its options open and could restart its nuclear weapons program at any time -- I would add, if it has not done so already."
Gates urged countries around the world to demand that Iran "come clean" about its past nuclear weapons development and insist that it suspend uranium enrichment, pledge not to develop nuclear weapons in the future and agree to inspections. Until it takes those steps, he suggested, engaging Iran in talks would not be productive.
Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful energy purposes.
At one point, Gates, a former head of the CIA, spoke mockingly of the Iranian government's agreement with the intelligence report.
"Astonishingly, the revolutionary government of Iran has this week, for the first time, embraced as valid an assessment of the United States intelligence community," Gates said. "I assume that it also will embrace as valid" U.S. intelligence showing Iran is training militias in Iraq, backing terrorist organizations and carrying out other hostile acts, he said.
Iranian officials decided Friday not to attend the conference.
In questions following Gates's speech, attendees voiced both approval and suspicion. Some accused the United States of a double standard for failing to object to Israel's possession of nuclear weapons. Asked whether he thought Israel's nuclear arsenal posed a threat to the region, Gates initially gave a four-word answer: "No, I do not."
Another questioner asserted that the intelligence report had "totally destroyed" any unanimity of the international community to pressure and sanction Iran on the nuclear issue.
Gates urged Gulf nations to shift their focus from bilateral military ties with the United States toward multilateral cooperation to better counter Iran and other threats. Specifically, he called for a collective effort to develop regional air and missile defense systems, as well as a shared monitoring of waters in the region for terrorism, piracy, drug trafficking and smuggling.
On Iraq, Gates said President Bush's troop increase over the past year has helped quell violence and demonstrated an enduring U.S. commitment to stabilizing the country. But he said the decline in U.S. troop levels starting this month represents "risks and opportunities for the whole region."
Arab nations should back the Iraqi government, Gates said, because if Iraq fails as a state, the repercussions will be felt first and most profoundly in the Middle East

[Abdul Wahid]

NICE ILLUSTRATION
ME AGREE WITH IT.

CAN U PLZ TELL ME THE SOURCE?

[Mazher]

NICE ILLUSTRATION
ME AGREE WITH IT.

CAN U PLZ TELL ME THE SOURCE?

warm welcome to this prestigious forum sir

Thanxxx 4 appreciation

Coming precisely about the answer i.e. "Washington Post"