Thursday, March 28, 2024
07:49 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles

News & Articles Here you can share News and Articles that you consider important for the exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Wednesday, January 30, 2013
saadat110's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rawalpindi
Posts: 239
Thanks: 179
Thanked 101 Times in 78 Posts
saadat110 will become famous soon enough
Default The current affairs orientation of the FPSC — Dr Qaisar Rashid

The current affairs orientation of the FPSC — Dr Qaisar Rashid



The question paper of the year 2012 divulges at least two patterns: first, redundant topics, and secondly, trite topics

The Federal Service Commission (FPSC) is obligated to recruit candidates every year from all over Pakistan on grade 17 posts through a competitive examination called the Central Superior Services (CSS) examination. In the compulsory paper of current affairs, the CSS candidates are not only required to express adequate knowledge of the subject but they are also supposed to show their ability in critical analysis of a given situation. Horizontally, the question paper of the year 2012 divulges at least two patterns: first, redundant topics, and secondly, trite topics.
Regarding the first pattern of outmoded topics, one can cite question number four asked in the paper of 2012 displayed on the website of the FPSC: “Substantiate Pakistan’s role in Common Wealth.” Is this a question? Is this a way to frame a question? The word ‘Commonwealth’ should take the definite article ‘the’ before it. What is the relevance of the word ‘substantiate’ to the ‘role of Pakistan’ in the Commonwealth? The point is why is it necessary for CSS candidates to know about the Commonwealth and not about the World Trade Organisation (WTO)? It is the WTO that is prodding Pakistan and India into opening mutual trade avenues under its Most Favoured Nation (MFN) proviso.
Regarding the second pattern of commonplace topics, one can cite question numbers five and seven asked in the paper of 2012: “How can the energy crisis of Pakistan be resolved?” and “How can the corruption be managed in Pakistan?” The point is how can the examiner judge the critical analytical abilities of CSS candidates from the answers to these questions? What about the causes? What was the problem in framing the question number five in this way: ‘Why has the energy crisis engulfed Pakistan? How can Pakistan survive this onslaught?’ Question number seven disappoints in at least two ways: first, the definite article ‘the’ should not be used here with the word ‘corruption’ and secondly the word ‘manage’ implies a controlled presence. Apparently, the question means that corruption cannot be eradicated and, therefore, it should be managed. The same point also means that Pakistani society has lost its psychological battle against corruption and that corruption has been rationalised. The next question is this: if corruption can be managed in society, what is the touchstone to judge whether it has been managed or not? Above all, both are trite topics (or questions). All CSS candidates must have attempted these two questions. It means more than 8,000 candidates wrote answers to these questions. How can the answers help the head examiner (who is also the paper setter) and his/her team to differentiate (qualitatively) between the candidates who have been working hard for the past one year for instance, and those who have made just a guest appearance?
Vertically, the question paper of the year 2012 reveals at least another two patterns: first, the existence of mistakes in the English language, and secondly, an effort to obscure questions to confound CSS candidates. Regarding the first pattern depicting the English language mistakes, one can cite question number two, three, four, six, seven and eight asked in the paper of 2012 displayed on the website of the FPSC. All these questions are rife with the mistakes of the definite article ‘the’. The rectified versions of these questions are these: “Evaluate the significance of [the] water conflict between India and Pakistan in [the] global perspective of climate change.” “Discuss the impact of foreign aid on Pakistan in [the] post-9/11 scenario.” “Substantiate Pakistan’s role in [the] Commonwealth.” “Discuss issues in the higher educational (sic) system vis-à-vis [the] 18th Amendment in Pakistan.” “How can the (sic) corruption be managed in Pakistan?” and “Discuss [the] impact of economic development of China on [the] World Order.” Only question number five escaped any article mistake.
Regarding the second pattern of obscure questions, one can cite question number six in which the word ‘vis-à-vis’ is used. Instead of that, the phrase ‘in the light of’ should have been used to convey the message clearly, as the word ‘vis-à-vis’ also conveys the meaning of ‘in comparison with’. The question should have been framed in this way: In the light of the 18th Amendment, discuss the issues being faced by the higher education system in Pakistan. Why can the questions not be framed properly and made intelligible?
Generally speaking, the paper setter has promoted two trends: first, commit the English language mistakes and get away with them, and secondly, instead of reading national and international English dailies and magazines of repute, make the examination preparation from books being churned out by publishing houses abundant in, for instance, Urdu Bazaar, Lahore.
It seems that either the FPSC relies totally on the paper setter and sends him/her no instructions to follow or the discretion enjoyed by the paper setter to select the topics and the way of framing questions overrules the FPSC’s advice. For the past three years, no full question has been asked on the Balochistan issue. In 2010, only a short question was asked about the Balochistan package against ten marks. Does the issue of Balochistan deserve such little attention? Is it not sheer intellectual dishonesty to neglect such an important topic? If CSS candidates are not supposed to know about the Balochistan issue, who else should know about that? The same is the problem with handling the issues of ethnicity, sectarianism and provincialism ravaging Pakistan.
Similarly, for the past three years, no question has been asked on the local bodies, the seventh NFC Award, the Gilgit-Baltistan Order 2009, Pakistan’s foreign policy challenges, the role of the services sector in Pakistan’s economy, the impact of the Arab Spring on Pakistani society, the US-India nuclear energy deal, Pak-India trade, etc. When an ignorant lot is inducted through the FPSC, what solutions they can come up with during their service tenure is anybody’s guess.


The writer is a freelance columnist and can be reached at qaisarrashid@yahoo.com

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...0-1-2013_pg3_3
__________________
Truth is the most powerful force on earth because it can not be changed. (Mike Murdock)
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to saadat110 For This Useful Post:
Disciple of Aristotle (Wednesday, January 30, 2013), engineerchauhan (Wednesday, January 30, 2013), Furquan592 (Friday, March 08, 2013), Naveed_Bhuutto (Friday, February 01, 2013)
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NAB Result Announced: Please Share Your Marks sarfaraz shami National Accountability Bureau (NAB) 240 Saturday, August 15, 2015 12:07 PM
plzzz check.... DILRUBA G Geography 7 Saturday, December 03, 2011 09:25 PM
Current Affairs Articles & Readings - Regularly Updated! Tutankhamen Current Affairs Notes 2 Friday, September 04, 2009 08:49 PM
All about Current Affairs Argus Current Affairs 1 Tuesday, November 15, 2005 04:01 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.