Friday, April 19, 2024
06:35 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles

News & Articles Here you can share News and Articles that you consider important for the exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, February 15, 2013
Call for Change's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crumbling Prison of Cruel Customs
Posts: 1,158
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 1,807 Times in 836 Posts
Call for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud ofCall for Change has much to be proud of
Default Curiouser and Curiouser... by Najam Sethi

Curiouser and Curiouser... by Najam Sethi


When Dr Tahirul Qadri, the maverick dual national crusader for true democracy "after delaying the elections to cleanse the system", struck Pakistan like a bolt from the blue last month, pundits were quick to speculate about his "true motives" and the "hidden hand" pulling his strings. In fact, Dr Qadri stoked the conspiracy theories by insisting that the military and judiciary were legitimate "stakeholders" in the system and should be formally consulted on how to reform the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and establish the caretaker administration to oversee the elections. The Supreme Court (SC) provided grist for the mills when, midway through Dr Qadri's Islamabad dharna, it directed the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to arrest Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf for alleged corrupt practices, prompting Dr Qadri to claim that the SC's decision had resolved "half his agenda" while the rest would be sorted out later, an allusion to collusion with the "establishment".

Now we know that the SC is not impressed by Dr Qadri's revolutionary rhetoric or amused by his political antics. It has firmly rejected a petition by Dr Qadri praying for the dissolution of the ECP because it was not legitimately constituted. The SC has spurned the petition because the petitioner lacks locus standi by virtue of being a dual Pak-Canadian national. In fact, the SC has chastised Dr Qadri for having the audacity to meddle in Pakistan's constitutional matters while pledging loyalty to the Queen Elizabeth II who is technically the Sovereign of Canada.

This is a radical judgment for two reasons. First, there is nothing in the constitution that bars a dual national from petitioning the courts on constitutional matters. In fact, the constitution recognizes dual nationals as bona fide citizens of Pakistan enjoying full property and voting rights and only bars them from being elected as members of parliament. Therefore the SC is seemingly setting a new bar on the rights and privileges of dual nationals that is not laid down in the constitution. Second, the SC's aggressive questioning of Dr Qadri's patriotism and political credentials - it went so far as to berate him for trying to destabilize the system - has served to sidestep the legal merits of the case and emphasize politics instead. The court did not allow him to argue the case with reference to Article 184(3) of the Constitution relating to fundamental rights and public interest. Nor did it refer him to Article 199 whereby a quo warranto writ challenging the appointments of the members of the ECP should be lodged at the level of the High Courts rather than the SC. This has provoked Dr Qadri to burst out indignantly against the SC in general because his case was not heard on merit and Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry in particular for haranguing him about his loyalty to Canada - Dr Qadri counter-accused Justice Chaudhry of being a Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) judge for legitimizing the 1999 coup of General Pervez Musharraf and questioned his loyalty to the Constitution!

The mutually hostile court proceedings, including the judgment and the follow-on comments by both Dr Qadri and the CJP, have soured the debate. The CJP has warned Dr Qadri to hold his tongue and beware contempt of court action but Dr Qadri has angrily heaped more scorn on the court. Therefore the matter is not closed. Both men are known to dig their heels in at times such as these.

Dr Qadri has two legal options and one political choice. On the legal front, he can either file a review appeal before the SC or get a non-dual Pakistani national belonging to his Pakistan Awami Tehreek to file a new petition in the SC that doesn't attract the ire of the court on locus standi. Or he can go straight to the Lahore or Islamabad High Court in pursuit of justice vide Article 199 where he can make out a strong case against the ECP on technical grounds. On the political side, he can stand up and solicit imprisonment in the hope of becoming a hero for standing up for the rights of millions of dual national Pakistanis abroad whose sweat and blood props up the Pakistan economy by way of billions of dollars in forex remittances as well as for the millions of Pakistanis at home who share his demand to clean up the electoral system and make parliament more functional by blocking the entry of cheats, liars and thieves.

The multiple ironies should not be lost. Originally Dr Qadri eulogized the SC and demanded a stake for it in decision-making about elections and caretakers. Now he has blasted it for betraying his trust. A section of the media that eulogized Dr Qadri for raising his voice against perfidious parliamentarians is now castigating him for contemning the SC. And those who alleged an unholy nexus between the SC and Dr Qadri in order to delay the elections are eating humble pie. The conspiracy is getting curiouser and curiouser.

http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/...0130215&page=1
__________________
Sangdil Riwajoon ki ya Imart-e-Kohna Toot bhi Tou Skti hay
Yeh Aseer Sehzadi Choot bhi tou Skti hay
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.