Friday, March 29, 2024
12:18 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > Dawn

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Saturday, November 21, 2015
exclusively's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,879
Thanks: 1,595
Thanked 1,290 Times in 783 Posts
exclusively has a spectacular aura aboutexclusively has a spectacular aura aboutexclusively has a spectacular aura about
Default Enough PhD’s, thank you

Enough PhD’s, thank you

When Freeman Dyson suggested we have lunch together at the Princeton University cafeteria on my next visit, I almost fell off my chair. To be invited by this legendary physicist, now 90-plus but sharp as ever, meant more than a banquet especially arranged for me by the Queen of England. Countless kings, queens, and generals have come and gone but only a tiny number of visionaries, Dyson included, actually make history.

Overwhelmed, I was about to blurt “thank you, Dr Dyson” but stopped in time. Else this would have violated an unstated protocol. We theoretical physicists address colleagues by their first name. And so I simply thanked him as Freeman. This avoided a still more serious error. Freeman Dyson does not have a PhD and has never sought or needed one.

Three books and biographies have been written on this PhD-less scientific genius. But, were he to apply to a Pakistani university, at best he might become an assistant professor. I thought of this while suffering through some lectures last week at an international physics conference in Islamabad.

Sadly, the presentations by most Pakistani PhD’s were uninteresting, others were wrong. One was even laughably wrong. Probably the worst was by a professor who was not just a ‘doctor’ but a ‘professor doctor’. This terrible pomposity, borrowed from some German tradition, is now routinely augmented with ‘distinguished professor’, ‘national professor’ and what-not. Like cartoon generals who have won no wars but have medals stuck to oversized chests, Pakistan now has legions of highly paid ignoramus cartoon professors.

Pakistan now has legions of highly paid ignoramus cartoon professors.
But wait, am I not being terribly unfair? Our professors are publishing huge numbers of research papers these days, almost 10 times more than a decade ago. Some produce as many as 40-60 every year (Dyson’s lifetime total is a mere 50). These appear in so-called international journals with high-impact factors, are well-cited, and seemingly fulfil all requirements of high quality. The authors rake in cash prizes, national awards, and the Higher Education Commission (HEC) screams about the post-2002 ‘revolution’ at every opportunity.

But the truth forlornly begs to be heard: there is no actual research behind most of these so-called research papers. The internet has placed at an author’s fingertip vast amounts of literature from which to freely cut and paste, invent data, and plagiarise ideas. Although software checks like Turn-It-In exist, they are next to useless. True, the ideal journal referee is supposed to be a know-all. But in fact he is too hard-pressed to check everything, or may even be complicit. Publishing in fly-by-night journals, or arranging for your paper to be cited, is now a finely developed art form.

Crime in Pakistani academia has overtaken even the legendary bribery of our police departments or the easy corruption of income tax authorities. But dealing with academic heist, now organised and systematised, won’t be easy. Here’s why.

First, knowledge is increasingly specialised and to detect cheating isn’t easy. A molecular biologist might not fairly judge the work of an ethologist, or a plasma physicist that of a string theorist. In principle any academic community must police itself rather than be policed from outside. But the small number of genuine academics in Pakistan means that there are precious few policemen.

Second, a thoughtless government policy that pays by the number of research papers and PhD’s produced allows cheats to get rich. Unable to tell good from bad, the Pakistan Council for Science and Technology actively encourages our professors to pillage public property.

The same dynamics applies to PhD production. The basic subject knowledge of PhD candidates is rarely tested and, if ever, only perfunctorily. Although the referees of a candidate’s thesis are supposed to be impartial, they are often chosen by a supervisor for being cooperative. Of course, the reports can be appropriately doctored when necessary.

Most PhD supervisors never get caught while doctoring. But if by rare chance someone does, he gets little more than a tap on the wrist. A colleague, a former professor of biology at Quaid-i-Azam University, then also the dean, was caught red-handed while faking referee reports for his PhD students. He admitted guilt but was not terminated and retained all retirement benefits. The administration and other colleagues shrugged off the incident; why be strict to one of your own kind? The man moved on to become dean at another university, and then emerged yet again as vice chancellor at still another university.

This ‘kindness’ has put the cancer of corruption into metastasis. Arresting further growth will require a harsh chemotherapy regime. As the very first step, rewarding authors of research papers with cash should be stopped. PCST, as well as other government organisations deliberately fuelling academic corruption, should be closed down and their directors charge-sheeted.

Transparency should be non-negotiable. While it cannot end abuse, it can discourage. So, before the author of a research paper gets any kind of credit, such as for promotion, he must give a presentation that anyone can freely attend. This should be video-recorded and archived for open access on HEC’s website. Whereas HEC’s present chairman privately agreed to my suggestion nearly two years ago, and then publicly on television a year later, I see no signs of implementation.

Still more radical therapy may be needed. As with a driving licence, all PhD degrees (including my own) should be de-recognised every 10 years, and re-recognised only after passing a literacy test in that particular discipline. Administered by some trustable overseas organisation, the written test should be at the level of an undergraduate examination equivalent to that taken by students after their first year of studies at a good foreign university. Will this reduce our current PhD population by 50 per cent? Eighty per cent?

No country becomes wealthy by printing a mountain of paper currency. And no university system becomes better by dishing out substandard PhD degrees, or by accepting vacuous research papers as valid. Instead, the way forward lies in adhering to strict ethical standards, cultivating excellence, rejecting mediocrity, and nurturing a spirit of inquiry and intellectual excitement.

The writer teaches physics in Lahore and Islamabad.

Published in Dawn, November 21st, 2015
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to exclusively For This Useful Post:
alirazakh (Monday, November 23, 2015)
  #2  
Old Monday, November 23, 2015
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ahmed Pur East
Posts: 92
Thanks: 13
Thanked 44 Times in 21 Posts
27usman is on a distinguished road
Default

Academic crime is at its peak in Pakistan. i have also faced this. My supervisor, dean of department, publish my research paper with his own name which i present him to check quality and for advice.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 27usman For This Useful Post:
exclusively (Monday, November 23, 2015)
  #3  
Old Monday, November 23, 2015
pureapak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 854
Thanks: 333
Thanked 487 Times in 320 Posts
pureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the rough
Default

In order to avoid this, if one's work is excellent, he should forward copy to multiple people ,concerned, as a proof with date and time.
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pureapak For This Useful Post:
exclusively (Monday, November 23, 2015)
  #4  
Old Monday, November 23, 2015
alirazakh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: No man's land
Posts: 308
Thanks: 104
Thanked 138 Times in 98 Posts
alirazakh is on a distinguished road
Default Agree

Very true. Those who supervise even lack what the scholar has studied and done. Due to scarcity of talent hunt, originality and creativity .We just manipulate data and get degree while universities have become printing machines to print degrees since we need degree/rubbish papers (manipulated ones) not talent to survive in Pakistan. It's a cyclic process since one has to complete research in specified semesters while the enrollment fees add fuel to the fire.We need marks and grades rather real potential.
__________________
Our life, our decisions; no complaints, no regrets.(self)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to alirazakh For This Useful Post:
exclusively (Monday, November 23, 2015)
  #5  
Old Monday, November 23, 2015
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Tainted is on a distinguished road
Default

Meet this person, Dr. Pervez HoodBhoy who teaches philosophy, International Relation, Political Science, Education, Ethics, Sociology, Defence strategy, Nuclear Politics and a long list of subjects. But Unfortunately, published not even a single book on physics (except for one crappy co-edited), no patent, and no creation in his primary field of study.
By the way, he is the national jack of all studies !
__________________
“Omnipotence and omniscience are the end of power and knowledge.”
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tainted For This Useful Post:
exclusively (Monday, November 23, 2015)
  #6  
Old Monday, November 23, 2015
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 125
Thanks: 18
Thanked 60 Times in 47 Posts
Ambivalent is on a distinguished road
Default

I truly agree to the poor level of our higher education system. Most Phds are taking handsome pays for courses which they have prepared 10 to 15 years ago, when they were initially appointed. Afterwards, they teach from a small note book, in which they have made their notes; there is no creativity and new work in the courses taught. Consequently, students get demotivated and they just want to clear their semesters or annual exams. They have to do it by learning the same notebook of the teacher. Thus they learn or cram it and make it through the final exams.This is something which is repeated over the years. Similarly, the culture of research is supposed to increase rather it is declining. And many research papers are published on the names of teachers or supervisors but the main work on the paper is done by the student. Students get their names as co-authors in the papers.
I don't know how and when will out system get on track of revival.
__________________
Best of Luck.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ambivalent For This Useful Post:
exclusively (Monday, November 23, 2015), MADIHA IRFAN (Tuesday, November 24, 2015)
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.