Friday, April 19, 2024
07:27 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > Dawn

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, December 01, 2015
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ehtisham Ehmed is on a distinguished road
Default Grounds for change

THE build-up to change seems to have intensified. Away from Pakistan’s own little experiments with various formats of the game, international cricket is currently facing an onslaught of new ideas.

At one place, the debate is about doing away with the toss at the outset of a match and letting home teams decide whether they want to bowl or bat first.

At the same time, the proposal for four-day Test matches has been revived with some seriousness against the backdrop of quick finishes such as the one in Nagpur last week in which India defeated South Africa inside three days.

And if this were not a repulsive enough idea for the leisurely gentleman in white flannels, he is left to frown upon the first-ever day-night Test where he is made to chase an unfamiliar pink ball that cannot, to the conventional mind, ever rival the feel and shine of the old cherry.

Some protest at the death of values and tradition — before the incorrigibly hooked find new ways to reconcile with the new, more instantaneously gratifying offerings inside a cricket field.

On the other hand, there are discussions about the variety available to connoisseurs of the game and to the excited, non-traditional fans. In reality, however, this debate about changes is a realistic reminder that the look of the game may change sooner than anticipated in the past.

Just as Pakistan tries — quite unsuccessfully at the moment — to be equally competitive in all formats of cricket, it can be said that some of the old varieties of the game are being nudged onto the fast lane towards their eventual exit.

It’s been a few years since those who proudly stood by the five-day Test were asked to turn up in considerable numbers at the stadium in order to save their favourite format from becoming obsolete.

The response to that warning has been patchy and popular attention appears to be turning towards the faster versions on the market.

So much so that on occasion even the 50-over-a-side brand tie is considered too laborious and time-consuming when an outcome and plenty of revenue can be had from a contest lasting 40 overs. The countdown continues.

A country can have three different teams playing three different formats — Tests, one-dayers and T-20 games.

The game cannot quite continue to have enough spectators for all three categories to prosper.

(Published in Dawn, November 29th, 2015)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab sajidnuml Constitutional Law 5 Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM
Police Ordinance 2002 rao adeel Police Service of Pakistan 4 Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:01 PM
Various states outlawed political parties on multiple grounds in 100 years niazikhan2 News & Articles 0 Friday, October 07, 2011 09:07 AM
Need help: Constitution's questions rqabutt Constitutional Law 11 Monday, February 07, 2011 11:06 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.