Saturday, April 20, 2024
06:27 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > Dawn

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 432
Thanks: 412
Thanked 359 Times in 196 Posts
azeegum has a spectacular aura aboutazeegum has a spectacular aura aboutazeegum has a spectacular aura about
Default US troops may stay past 2014 in Afghanistan: report

US troops may stay past 2014 in Afghanistan: report

WASHINGTON: The US commander in Afghanistan said in an interview published Wednesday that American troops could stay in Afghanistan beyond 2014, the latest signal of a possible open-ended US military role in the country.

General John Allen told the New York Times that negotiations with Afghan officials on a strategic partnership would “almost certainly” feature “a discussion with Afghanistan of what a post-2014 force will look like.” Afghan President Hamid Karzai had “in fact, just the other day talked about his desire to have conversations with the US about a post-2014 force,” Allen was quoted as saying.

“We would probably see some number of advisers, trainers, intelligence specialists here for some period of time beyond 2014,” the commander said.

Allen, who oversees the Nato-led force in the 10-year-old war, is the highest-ranking military officer to openly suggest the possibility of American forces remaining beyond 2014.

President Barack Obama’s administration has suggested combat troops would depart by the end of 2014 but left the door open to a residual force remaining on the ground.

The US ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker, said earlier this month that Washington would be ready to keep forces in Afghanistan if the Kabul government requested it.

With the United States now engaged in a gradual troop drawdown, Karzai said Sunday his government is negotiating the terms of a long-term US presence in the country that could involve American troops.

US-led troops, which toppled the Taliban in a 2001 invasion, have been battling the hardline religious insurgency for ten years and are due to hand over security duties to Afghan government forces by 2015.

The United States is withdrawing 10,000 troops this year, leaving 91,000 on the ground into next year. Another 23,000 are due to leave by the end of September.

Former Afghan officials and analysts have warned the country likely will slide into a civil war, with rivals India and Pakistan clashing through proxies, if US and allied forces withdraw at the end of 2014.

In Iraq, US and Iraqi leaders could not agree on the terms for a future US force and the withdrawal of American troops has been accompanied by sectarian political turmoil.
__________________
Real richness is that you are so expensive that no one can buy your character.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to azeegum For This Useful Post:
Roha Mustafa (Monday, December 26, 2011)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pak-Affairs Notes Predator Pakistan Affairs 68 Friday, December 23, 2022 07:27 PM
Indian Intervention in Afghanistan tabassum majeed News & Articles 2 Monday, August 16, 2010 01:57 AM
Obama's new Afghan strategy roadlesstaken Current Affairs Notes 0 Monday, March 16, 2009 10:44 AM
Cost paid by USA, to purse a failed policy lmno250 News & Articles 0 Saturday, February 07, 2009 12:04 PM
Report of Technical Commitee on Water Resources Yasir Hayat Khan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Monday, January 16, 2006 02:53 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.