Thursday, March 28, 2024
03:26 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > The Express Tribune

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Monday, February 03, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: pure homeland
Posts: 42
Thanks: 38
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
jahanzaib khan kakar is on a distinguished road
Post Governance and development

Development economists and development experts agree that for economic progress to become sustainable, countries must go beyond the efficient use of factors of production, such as labour and capital. A few decades ago, they began to include technological progress and human development in their growth equations. Later still, they identified institutional development as an important contributor to economic development. Now there is considerable focus on an input broadly defined as ‘governance’. In fact, good governance and quality of governance came to be discussed as the reason why economic growth in Pakistan had stalled for the last six or so years. All political parties mentioned governance as a priority area in the manifestoes they issued before the elections of May 2013.

This is not surprising since there was consensus in the country that the Pakistan Peoples Party government that was in office for five years had failed on this score. There was also agreement that the quality of governance had to improve before Pakistan could hope to leave behind the trajectory of slow growth it has been on in recent years and climb on to a higher plane. Even though there is general consensus on these issues — on the importance of good governance and Pakistan’s failure to provide it — the term is poorly understood. We need to answer the following three questions: what is good governance? How is Pakistan faring in this area compared with other emerging economies? What should policymakers do to improve it?

One way of understanding the governance challenges countries such as Pakistan face is through their impact on effectiveness, efficiency, continuity and accountability. These criteria should be applied to the delivery of all services expected of the government by the citizenry. I will take each of these by turn. Effectiveness refers to performance: the ability of the state to deliver services that meet the needs of the people. For instance, if the state cannot provide security as is the case in most areas of Pakistan at this time, it is not being effective.

For efficiency, the work done by the World Bank has some interesting insights. In Pakistan: The Transformative Path, a collection of essays by some of the economists familiar with the Pakistani scene, the World Bank has a good explanation of what is implied by the government’s efficiency. This refers to the “manner in which the state functions, specifically to its ability to mobilise revenue and its ability to use that money in a way that minimises waste and corruption — and maximises results”. Pakistan has performed poorly on all these counts. It has one of the world’s lowest tax-to-GDP ratio; the government does not have enough resources of its own even to pay for its current expenditure let alone for financing development; in planning development, the projects government finances are often brought on the books to hire vehicles for project managers and pay them additional allowances; and the level of corruption has increased over the years. In other words, the government’s development programme does not maximise citizen’s welfare.

Lack of continuity has been a problem. There are several reasons for this. Among them, the lack of understanding of the role the state should play in promoting economic development and managing the economy. The pendulum has swung widely in the past between allowing the private sector a great deal of space to having a highly intrusive state. The former was the case during the years when Muhammad Ayub Khan and Pervez Musharraf governed; later Zulfikar Ali Bhutto brought much of large-scale industry and finance under the control of the state. The swings of the pendulum meant that consistent signals were not sent out to potential investors to make long-term commitment of their capital.

Accountability, the fourth leg of the good governance stool, has been an issue in Pakistan for decades. Of the several attempts made in the past to create an institutional infrastructure, none was able to resist politicisation. When the institutions created for the purpose were given a great deal of power and authority, the governments that were in place found it difficult to resist the temptation not to use them to achieve political ends. Fragmentation of the accountability system is also a problem. While much of the public attention is focused on the National Accountability Bureau, there are several other institutions that make up the system. Other public institutions are the Public Accounts Committee, the Judicial Commission, the Election Commission of Pakistan, Ombudsman institutions, the Federal Investigation Agency and various provincial agencies. For economic governance, there is another set of institutions: the State Bank of Pakistan, the Competition Commission of Pakistan and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. The main problem with these institutions is not only government interference but also absence of financial autonomy. Lack of transparency is another issue in the area of accountability.

Given this definition of ‘governance’ — dividing its functions into effectiveness, efficiency, continuity and accountability — what are the public policy choices available to a government interested in improving it? The agenda is vast and must cover a number of fronts. Three areas of action stand out. The first of these is to bring government closer to the people. This will mean strengthening not only provincial governments but also government at the local level. Second, information about what the government does should be readily available. Third, there is urgent need to improve the human and financial capacity of the more critical parts of the large institutional structure that already exists.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 3rd, 2014.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good Governance In pakistan sehrish jamal Essays 2 Thursday, November 12, 2015 05:36 PM
Essays - Officer Academy LHR uzma khan youzaf zai Essays 24 Sunday, October 18, 2015 12:59 AM
Good Governace (Check and Comment) Tauseef Taj Kiani Essays 1 Saturday, January 12, 2013 01:23 AM
National Education Policy 2009 Raja Bahar Pakistan Affairs 0 Sunday, June 10, 2012 06:32 PM
Reconstruction of Afghanistan – Role of UNO Mao Zedong International Relations 0 Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:51 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.